17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

334 CONSTRAINTS AND PHASES<br />

The definition of prehension stresses the fact that the human hand<br />

is both an input and output device. As an output device, it can apply<br />

forces both to match the anticipated forces in the task and to impart<br />

motion to the object as necessary. As an input device, it can gather<br />

sensory information about the state of the interaction with the object<br />

during the task in order to ensure grasping and manipulative stability.<br />

Like the eye, the sensory and motor functions of the hand are<br />

intertwined and indivisible -- as the hand is moving and feeling to<br />

grasp, it is grasping to feel and move objects. Covariance of<br />

cutaneous and articular motion provides information for haptic form<br />

perception (Gibson, 1962).<br />

Sensorimotor features of the hand, as described in <strong>Chapter</strong> 6,<br />

include glabrous skin structure, eccrine glands, cutaneous<br />

mechanoreceptors, proprioceptors, muscles, tendons, and joints. In<br />

terms of the glabrous skin structure, properties include papillary<br />

ridges; ability to comply, hold and resist pressure and shearing forces;<br />

dermis and epidermis interface; fat pads; increase in stiffness to loads;<br />

elasticity; viscoelastic properties; and response to friction. (See<br />

Bowden 8z Tabor, 1967; Comaish 8z Bottoms, 1971; Eckert, 1989;<br />

Montagna 8z Parakkal, 1974; Moore, 1972; Quilliam, 1978; Wilkes,<br />

Brown 8z Wildnauer, 1973). In terms of the eccrine glands, properties<br />

include spacing, large number in palms, periodicity, discharge during<br />

gripping, mental responses, composition of sweat, efferent pathways,<br />

effect on coefficient of friction, and the mechanical effect on skin in<br />

terms of boundary lubrication creating adhesion. (See Gabella, 1976;<br />

Jones, 1989; Kuno, 1934; Moberg, 1962; Naylor, 1955; Rothman,<br />

1954). In terms of the cutaneous mechanoreceptors, properties<br />

include quantity (they are numerous in the hand), morphology and<br />

location of receptors, organization of afferent terminals in spinal cord,<br />

receptive field size, receptor innvervation density, and adaptation<br />

characteristics. (See Johansson, 1978; Johansson 8z Vallbo, 1983;<br />

Vallbo 8z Johansson, 1984). In terms of proprioceptors, properties<br />

include morphology and location of receptors (in joints, muscles, and<br />

tendons), number, and response characteristics. (See Babu 8z<br />

Devanandan, 1991; Devanandan, Ghosh 8z John, 1983; Devanandan,<br />

Ghosh 8z Simoes, 1980; Sathian 8z Devanandan 1983). There is a lack<br />

of tendon organs in the hand. With a large number and density of<br />

muscle spindles in the hand, they seem to be implicated in perception<br />

of direction, distinct from the perception of movement. Digital joint<br />

mechanoreceptors are specialized particularly for detection of dynamic<br />

mechanical changes, rather than static joint position. The traditional<br />

view is that joint receptors respond to motion, while cutaneous

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!