17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

310 CONSTRAINTS AND PHASES<br />

While their existence is more an aspect of the hand’s anatomy (see<br />

Section 6.1), their use in a prehensile posture is such that they can<br />

automatically supply a force sufficient to counteract small amplitude<br />

perturbations of the object, useful in stable grasping (along the lines<br />

of a ‘soft finger’ as a contact type that resists moments about the<br />

contact normal (Salisbury & Craig, 1982). The lubricant is greasy,<br />

having good adhesive qualities at low shear velocities, enhanced by<br />

the hills and valleys of the ridged surface extending the total shearing<br />

surface area (Moore, 1975). At high shear velocities, friction is<br />

reduced, thus minimizing wear and tear of the hand surface. Because<br />

ridges are concentric in orientation, there will always be some<br />

perpendicular to the force exerted (as opposed to in the palm where<br />

this is not true). However, due to biomechanical properties, skin<br />

responds in nonlinear ways to loads (Wilkes, Brown, & Wildnauer,<br />

1973). As the load increases, collagen fibers in the dermis reorient<br />

from an irregularly arranged pattern to one orientated in the direction<br />

of the applied load. As more fibers become aligned and thus resist<br />

extension along their length, the skin becomes stiffer, reducing its<br />

ability to comply with the object.<br />

Object properties and the object’s relationship to the environment<br />

can affect the chosen posture. Jeannerod (1981) made a distinction<br />

between intrinsic and extrinsic properties of objects. Extrinsic<br />

properties are those spatially related to the person (i.e., location,<br />

distance, angle, etc.) and would include support constraints, such as a<br />

table supporting a surface, and other obstacle constraints (forcing one<br />

to reach around another object). Lederman and Klatzky (1987) have<br />

shown how subjects can extract intrinsic object properties relevant to<br />

the task. These include surface properties (texture, hardness, and<br />

temperature), structural properties (shape, volume, weight), and<br />

functional properties (part motion, specific function). Before making<br />

contact with an object, people can perceive many object properties<br />

visually (see Klatzky & Lederman, 1990). In a study where subjects<br />

had to use a precision grip to grasp one of ten different sized wooden<br />

disks, Marteniuk, Leavitt, MacKenzie, and Athenes (1990) showed<br />

that the maximum aperture reached during preshaping between the<br />

index finger and thumb closely correlated with disk size. In terms of<br />

the constraints that object properties impose on prehension, examples<br />

are numerous: object shape can delimit grasp postures and the number<br />

of fingers potentially contacting a surface; the weight of the object can<br />

determine the type and strength of grip; and the availability of an object<br />

surface will constrain the orientation of the reach and potential contact<br />

locations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!