17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Chapter</strong> 8 - Constraints on Human <strong>Prehension</strong> 309<br />

grasps (Hazelton et al., 1975). Because the extrinsic muscles send<br />

tendons through the wrist, the amount of force that the fingers are<br />

able to apply is greater in wrist extension and/or ulnar deviation than<br />

in other positions. Hazelton et al. (1975) noted that the relative<br />

amount of force available at each finger during a hook grip remains<br />

constant across wrist positions (25% at the index, 33.5% at the long<br />

finger, 25% at the ring finger, and 16.5% at the little finger). Amis<br />

(1987) found the mean contributions to be 30%, 30%, 22%, and 18%<br />

to the overall grasp force. The lesson here (and further detailed in<br />

Section 8.2) is that there is a differential in the individual finger's<br />

potential contribution to force application, thus a factor in choice of<br />

postures.<br />

Skin has properties that affect the frictional component of force<br />

generation. Typically, the law of static friction (Amonton's law)<br />

states that the tangential force, FT, of friction is constrained to be no<br />

greater than the product of the normal force N with the coefficient of<br />

static friction, ps, or FT I ps N (thus creating the cone of friction<br />

mentioned above). The coefficient of static friction, measured by<br />

various researchers (Buchholz et al., 1988; Comaish & Bottoms,<br />

1971; Westling & Johansson, 1984), involves an interaction between<br />

the constraints of the skin surface and object surface (see below for<br />

discussion of object properties). Comaish and Bottoms (1971) found<br />

that the hands palmar surface has a higher coefficient of static friction<br />

than the back of the hand. Buchholz, Frederick and Armstrong (1988)<br />

show that the coefficient of static friction increases when moisture is<br />

present, a situation that occurs particularly when the sweat glands of<br />

the palm are activated. Comaish and Bottoms also found that with<br />

some surfaces, the coefficient of static friction increased as the contact<br />

area increased (which would imply that Amonton's law is not the best<br />

model to use here, because it says the coefficient of static friction is<br />

dependent on the magnitude of the forces, not the amount of<br />

contacting area). Interestingly, the coefficient of static friction<br />

decreases with increasing load, reducing the effectiveness of friction<br />

for heavier objects (Buchholz et al., 1988; Comaish & Bottoms,<br />

197 1).<br />

The frictional component of force generation is further enhanced<br />

when the pulps on the distal palmar surface of the fingers are used.<br />

These are highly specialized for prehension in that they provide<br />

friction, due to the epidermal ridges and to the sticky self-lubricating<br />

excretions through the tops of the ridges, and that they to comply with<br />

(instead of being displaced by) objects touched in the environment<br />

(Glicenstein & Dardour, 198 1; Quilliam, 1978; Thomine, 198 1).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!