17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

300 THE PHASES OF PREHENSION<br />

are seen in the object and drive the Planning process, given the task<br />

requirements and object properties. The Setting Up Phase seems to<br />

demonstrate two different subphases. The first gets the hand posture<br />

‘in the ballpark’. During preshaping, the hand is driving the arm<br />

using anticipatory mechanisms and the hand is shaping according to<br />

the opposition space chosen. At the same time, the palm is being<br />

oriented. Then, after maximum aperture the hand encloses, a guarded<br />

movement involving feedback control anticipates tactile contact. The<br />

goal of setting up an opposition space is the alignment of the grasping<br />

surface patches of the hand with the seen opposition vector, given the<br />

opposition space parameterization appropriate for the task. The Using<br />

Phase is complex, involving rich interactions between vision, haptics<br />

and proprioception for controlling the hand, arm, and object.<br />

Movement seems to be driven strongly by sensory information and<br />

sensory consequences. Contact triggers a controller which uses active<br />

touch and controlled slipping to capture the object into the hand.<br />

Subgoals caused by the environmental goal can dominate in this<br />

phase, determining the influence of sensory information on the motor<br />

task; e.g., to hold a glass, a subgoal would be to squeeze fingers if the<br />

object is slipping, whereas to twirl a baton, a subgoal would be to<br />

reposition fingers if the object is slipping. The Releasing Phase is<br />

another example where feedforward anticipatory mechanisms seem to<br />

dominate, although it is unclear if the arm is driving the hand, the hand<br />

is driving the arm, or they are totally uncoupled.<br />

There is a distinction between free motion and compliant motion.<br />

This distinction permeates the planning and selection of opposition<br />

space parameters through to the motoneuron recruitment patterns and<br />

muscle contractions for the application of functionally effective forces<br />

to grasp and manipulate objects. Once an object is grasped stably, the<br />

transport of the object can be viewed as a free motion with a ‘loaded’<br />

limb. When the grasped object is being placed, the compliance of the<br />

supporting surface comes into play. Replacing the object on a support<br />

surface constitutes another guarded motion.<br />

Opposition space analysis has vector description of motions and<br />

forces. During free motion (trajectory related planning), the vectors<br />

are concerned with directions and distances within a polar coordinate<br />

system. Direction and distance appear to be parallel dimensions. In<br />

contrast, during compliant motion (force related planning), the vectors<br />

specify directions and magnitudes of forces to be applied, in a palm<br />

centered coordinate frame. Here direction and magnitude of forces<br />

may be different dimensions as well. In setting up an opposition<br />

space, the opposition vector determines the directional planning for the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!