17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Chapter</strong> 7 - Opposition Space Phases 289<br />

hand postures, using expert systems and neural networks. Expert<br />

systems make explicit the rules of these mappings; neural networks<br />

can learn the rules. Yet, none of these are performing the mapping the<br />

other way; i.e., how do the constraints of hand anatomy (level of<br />

fatigue, motivations, etc.) drive the choice of the opposition vector?<br />

Thirdly, a location and orientation in space for the hand to go to<br />

must be planned. Planning a hand location and orientation will depend<br />

on the grasp strategy chosen. Such a decision can be based on retinal<br />

information or on knowledge about the hand. It has been shown how<br />

wrist orientation is affected by task constraints. But this is the same<br />

issue as raised above. Constraints of the anatomy and other biological<br />

and motivational factors affect the perceived opposition vector, and<br />

thus the choice of the opposition space of the hand.<br />

How this plan is constructed in the brain is open to discussion. In<br />

<strong>Chapter</strong>s 3 and 4, task plans from a variety of fields were examined,<br />

showing possible mechanisms for programming phases, for<br />

integrating feedforward and feedback controllers, and for including<br />

contingencies for error. Some models suggested distributed control,<br />

others hierarchical control. Other models suggested how plans could<br />

be mapped out across regions of cortical and sub-cortical areas in the<br />

CNS. Neural recordings have amply demonstrated the CNS is<br />

computing something; what it is computing is unknown. Importantly,<br />

planning takes time, and reaction time studies have demonstrated that<br />

the more complex the movement, the longer the reaction time. Of<br />

course, subsequent movements can be planned during initial<br />

movements.<br />

From the experiments and computational models put forth in<br />

<strong>Chapter</strong>s 3-4, the underlying hypotheses are made explicit for the<br />

reader's further evaluation and research:<br />

1. A task plan is built in terms of sensory consequences (Abbs and<br />

Cole, 1987).<br />

<strong>2.</strong> Motor equivalence suggests task planning does not occur at the<br />

muscle level.<br />

3. A minimal amount of time is needed for planning. More time is<br />

needed for a more complicated serial task (Henry & Rogers,<br />

1960).<br />

4. Kuperstein (1988) built associations of maps between the eye<br />

position and arm configuration. This suggests that a person<br />

must look at where he/she wants the arm to go before<br />

movement occurs.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!