17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

274 THE PHASES OF PREHENSION<br />

shape of each ellipsoid reflecting the relative force requirement or<br />

motion requirement of the task. A grasp is stable if for every object<br />

wrench, there is a choice of joint torques to balance it, and a grasp is<br />

manipulable if, for every object motion, there exists a choice of joint<br />

velocities that will accommodate that motion without breaking contact.<br />

A grasp is assigned a twist space quality measure, which is the ratio<br />

between the task ellipsoid and the finger joint velocities, and a wrench<br />

space quality measure, which is the ratio between the task ellipsoid<br />

and the joint torques. A grasp is ‘good’, with respect to a given task,<br />

if it has a higher quality measure than other grasps (e.g., precision<br />

tasks need grasps with a high quality measure in the twist space).<br />

Finding a good grasp, then, is solved as an optimization problem.<br />

Once the grasp is found then given a goal, such as moving an object<br />

along a specified trajectory, Li and Sastry formulate a control<br />

algorithm for realizing the trajectory without breaking contact while<br />

regulating the internal forces.<br />

Fearing (1990) discussed how Kobayashi (1985) used a force<br />

control system to control local object motions with fingers in constant<br />

grasping locations. When objects need to be regrasped, for example<br />

in twirling a baton, roboticists have accomplished this through<br />

preprogrammed finger position commands (Okada, 1982) or using a<br />

sequence of applied forces at each finger (Fearing, 1986). To ensure<br />

robust manipulation, tactile sensing and perception are needed to<br />

provide information on contact forces and local shape properties.<br />

Tactile sensors can provide local shape information, including contact<br />

location on the finger, surface normals, principal curvatures and their<br />

direction. From this information, global object properties such as<br />

size, location and orientation are inferred. Fearing (1990, p. 236)<br />

notes that “the reorientation sub-system would command finger force,<br />

stiffness and position. High speed tactile or force sensing can monitor<br />

the grasping operation for unexpected forces, contact slip, and loss of<br />

contact. The reorientation planner may also continuously monitor<br />

object position during reorientation, and develop error recovery<br />

strategies if unexpected object loads are encountered”. He notes that<br />

there are complicated compliance, friction, rolling and slipping effects<br />

that can occur at finger-object interfaces.<br />

Rather than relying on sensors, Mason (1985) discussed how<br />

humans take advantage of task mechanics. In effect, control places us<br />

in the ballpark of the desired locations, forces, torques, motions; then,<br />

we use the intrinsic mechanics of the task environment as a funnel to<br />

eliminate uncertainties about the locations and shapes of objects (like<br />

funneling sand, where the funnel reduces uncertainty in the location of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!