17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Chapter</strong> 6 - During Contact 273<br />

internal representations of the object‘s properties based on previous<br />

manipulative experiences. For passive, predictable objects, they<br />

suggested somatosensory afferent signals intervene only<br />

intermittently, according to an ‘event driven’ control policy. In<br />

contrast, for active objects, control of grip and other reaction forces<br />

rely more regularly on somatosensory input, due to the unpredictable<br />

and erratic physical characteristics of the object. Grip forces appeared<br />

to be automatically regulated according to variations in the amplitude<br />

and rate of imposed load forces. Further experimentation is needed to<br />

define the effects of shearing forces, other aspects of object<br />

unpredictability, and to extend the research which has focussed<br />

primarily on pad opposition.<br />

6.6.2 Manipulation by robots<br />

As noted in considering the functional demands on a hand<br />

posture, applying forces to stably grasp the object is separate from<br />

imparting motion to an object for manipulation or transportation. In<br />

robotics, various algorithms have been developed for modelling the<br />

grasping forces (the internal forces described in Section 6.3.1) from<br />

the manipulation forces (the forces that impart motion to the object).<br />

For example, Yoshikawa and Nagai (1990) identify internal forces<br />

using geometric characteristics for a three-fingered grasp with<br />

frictional, point contacts. The grasping force is defined as an internal<br />

force which satisfies the static friction constraint. It consists of the<br />

unit vectors directed between the contacts. Using these unit vectors,<br />

grasp modes are specified for grasping arbitrarily shaped objects. The<br />

manipulating force is then defined as a fingertip force which satisfies<br />

the following 3 conditions:<br />

(1) it produces the specified resultant force;<br />

(2) it is not in the inverse direction of the grasping force; and<br />

(3) it does not contain any grasping force component.<br />

The method of manipulation they analyze is fixed contacts, since point<br />

contacts with friction do not allow rolling or sliding at the contacts.<br />

They present an algorithm for decomposing a given fingertip force into<br />

manipulating and grasping forces (note that the analytic solution may<br />

not be unique because of the existence of multiple grasp modes).<br />

Li and Sastry (1990) proposed a control algorithm for<br />

manipulation in two modes: fixed contacts and rolling contacts. Tasks<br />

are modelled as ellipoids in wrench space and twist space, with the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!