17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Chapter</strong> 6 - During Contact 269<br />

an unloaded limb, i.e., shape invariance in the velocity profile was<br />

observed. This finding has extended to transporting grasped objects<br />

of different weights. For pad opposition, investigating the effects of<br />

object weight (66, 155, and 423 g cylinders, of constant size and other<br />

visible characteristics) on kinematics and grip forces in a grasp to place<br />

task, Weir (1991; Weir & MacKenzie, 1993) found that during the<br />

dowel transport phase, maximum resultant velocity varied inversely<br />

with dowel weight, but the transport trajectories showed shape<br />

invariance, i.e., were scalable over time. In addition, a surprising, but<br />

robust kinematic finding, demonstrated by all subjects tested, was that<br />

during dowel transport, although the finger pads remained in contact<br />

with the gripping plates of a force transducer dowel, the aperture<br />

between thumb and index markers decreased substantially (about 15<br />

mm), presumably reflecting finger posturing for force application and<br />

propulsion of the dowel forward towards the target location.<br />

With respect to the forces applied during transport of a stably<br />

grasped object, Weir (1991) found that peak grip forces were higher<br />

when subjects transported the dowel to a target location 20 cm further<br />

forward in front of body midline (6. 0 N) than when they lifted the<br />

dowel to a 4 cm height (4.5 N). Peak load forces did not vary as a<br />

function of task requirements to lift or place, only as a function of<br />

object weight, replicating Westling and Johansson (1984; Johansson<br />

& Westling 1988a). In transporting an object, Flanagan, Tresilian and<br />

Wing (1993) concluded that the programming of grip force is part and<br />

parcel of the process of planning the loaded arm movement. Flanagan<br />

et al. studied point-to-point and cyclic movements of varying rates and<br />

directions and reported a tight coupling between grip and load forces;<br />

grip forces were modulated in phase with load force during<br />

movements with grasped objects. Flanagan et al. noted that the load<br />

forces varied both with the gravitational and inertial components.<br />

In dynamic grasping four forms of manipulation can be<br />

considered:<br />

1) FIXED CONTACTS - contacting locations between hand and<br />

object remain constant as motion is imparted to the object using<br />

coordinated manipulation.<br />

2) ROLLING CONTACTS - contacting locations between hand and<br />

object roll past one another while imparting rolling motion to the<br />

object. Fingers can roll on object or object can roll in fingers.<br />

3) SLIDING CONTACTS - contacting locations slide relative to<br />

one another imparting sliding motion to the object.<br />

4) REPOSITIONING OR REGRASPING - motion is imparted to<br />

object by relocating the hand’s contacting points on the object.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!