17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

268 THE PHASES OF PREHENSION<br />

system has a different set of mechanical and functional properties.<br />

Once grasped, the object is lifted, and it may be held (as in lifting a<br />

mug to wipe a countertop), transported (to place the mug on a shelf),<br />

manipulated (to hand to someone, to drink from, or to explore its<br />

features) and replaced (on the countertop).<br />

In considering manipulative hand movements, a profound<br />

distinction was made by Kunesch, Binkofski and Freund (1989).<br />

They analyzed the temporal frequency characteristics of manipulative,<br />

serial hand movements, for tasks including tactile discrimination,<br />

pencil shading, handwriting, typewriting, and repetititive tapping.<br />

They report a bimodal result: two separate classes of natural preferred<br />

frequencies (see Figure 6.21). At 1.56 Hz cluster exploratory finger<br />

movements in which the hand is used in active touch, to determine<br />

object properties like shape and texture. They suggest the slower<br />

range reflects ‘focal sensory control’, i.e., the temporal requirements<br />

of the sequential sampling from the mechanoreceptor population.<br />

These movements use motion to collect detailed somatosensory<br />

information. At 4 - 7 Hz cluster handwriting, and other cyclic, learned<br />

hand movements, with frequencies close to those of fast tapping.<br />

Frequencies for handwriting and shading were almost the same,<br />

regardless of whether the fingertip or pencil was used. They<br />

suggested the higher frequency movements are under different sensory<br />

control: the high frequency movements are not performed entirely<br />

open-loop, but monitored by ‘preattentive sensory processes’. These<br />

movements use proprioceptive and somatosensory inputs to monitor<br />

motion. This distinction between the two types of movements,<br />

consistent with Gibson’s (1962) ‘exploratory’ and ‘performatory’<br />

hand movements, is important for several reasons. First, the role of<br />

sensory information in motor control is different in the two classes of<br />

movements. Second, the task requirements for manipulation are key<br />

inputs for control, and manipulation to extract object properties using<br />

active touch is fundamentally different from manipulation in using<br />

touch for action with objects.<br />

It is important to distinguish between a static grasp for holding<br />

and transporting an object and a dynamic grasp for manipulation. In<br />

the first instance, an object is held firmly in a stable grasp with<br />

constant contacts, and object motion is achieved via the wrist, elbow,<br />

shoulder, or even through locomotion. In contrast, coordinated<br />

movements of the digits can manipulate an object within the hand.<br />

With respect to humans transporting a grasped object, it was<br />

observed in <strong>Chapter</strong> 5 that the kinematics of pointing with a loaded<br />

limb (Atkeson and Hollerbach, 1985) are scaled from the trajectory of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!