17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

264 THE PHASES OF PREHENSION<br />

with ulnar deviation, neutral between extension and flexion, whereas<br />

in a precision grasp, the wrist is dorsiflexed, positioned between ulnar<br />

and radial deviation. Because the extrinsic muscles send tendons<br />

through the wrist, the amount of force that the fingers are able to apply<br />

is greater in wrist extension and/or ulnar deviation than in other<br />

positions. In addition, there are differences between the fingers in<br />

their potential contribution to force application. For a hook grip,<br />

Hazelton et al. (1975) noted that the relative amount of force available<br />

at each finger remains constant across wrist positions (25% at the<br />

index, 33.5% at the long finger, 25% at the ring finger, and 16.5% at<br />

the little finger). For the power grasp, Amis (1987) found the mean<br />

contributions to the overall grasp force to be 30%, 30%, 22%, and<br />

18% for the index, long, ring and little fingers, respectively.<br />

The human hand can impart arbitrary forces and torques using<br />

pad opposition in the tripod (Drucker & Hollerbach, 1987). Subjects<br />

grasped a medium sized sphere using the thumb, index and middle<br />

fingers. The sphere was instrumented with a sensor capable of<br />

measuring forces and torques along six axes. Receiving constant<br />

feedback about actual forces being applied, subjects were asked to<br />

manipulate the sphere in arbitrary directions in order to achieve a<br />

target. Results indicated that subjects could control all force and<br />

torque components separately.<br />

6.5.2 Analytic posture measures<br />

The analysis of a grasp in the field of robotics uses formal quality<br />

measures. A formal quality measure is a quantification of some aspect<br />

of a grasp posture. Cutkosky and Howe (1990) informally described<br />

these measures as follows:<br />

Compliance: what is the effective compliance (the inverse of<br />

stiffness) of the grasped object with respect to the hand?<br />

Connectivity: how many degrees of freedom are there between the<br />

grasped object and the hand?<br />

Force closure: assuming that external forces act to maintain contact<br />

between the fingers and object, is the object unable to move<br />

without slipping when the fingers are ‘locked’?<br />

Form closure: can external forces and moments be applied from<br />

any direction without moving the object when the fingers are<br />

locked?<br />

Grasp isotropy: does the grasp configuration permit the finger<br />

joints to accurately apply forces and moments to the object?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!