17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

252 THE PHASES OF PREHENSION<br />

respectively). Thus, the ratio of grip-force/load-force can be lower for<br />

sandpaper than silk for a given weight. The ratio of grip-forceboad-<br />

force always exceeds a slip ratio by some safety margin. The slip ratio<br />

is that ratio of grip-forceboad-force at which the object slips from<br />

grasp as subjects open their fingers, shown in Figure 6.17b. The grip<br />

and load forces and their ratios are shown for the entire duration of the<br />

task in Figure 6.18.<br />

6.4.2 Phases in applying grip and load forces<br />

Westling and Johansson identified a series of distinct phases for<br />

the task of lifting the object from a table, holding it in the air, then<br />

replacing it on the table. From Figure 6.18, they identified the<br />

following events. A preload phase (about 80-100 ms) as the subject<br />

first grips the object (a) during which the grip force increases but the<br />

load force does not. This is followed by a- (b) when the<br />

grip and load forces increase in parallel. When the load force<br />

overcomes the force due to gravity (equal to the weight of the object),<br />

the object starts to move, beginning a transitional phase (c). When the<br />

object is being held in the air, the position of the object and grip and<br />

load forces are nearly constant, comprising a static phase (d). The<br />

replacement phase (e) includes motion of the object back to the table.<br />

After a short delay phase (0, the (g) occurs as the<br />

grip and load forces decrease in parallel. Then, the object is released.<br />

Using a similarly instrumented dowel, many of the Johansson<br />

and Westling results have been replicated in experiments examining<br />

object weight and task requirements (Weir, 1991; Weir & MacKenzie,<br />

1993, in preparation). We did not find a separate preloading phase; at<br />

first contact with the object, our strain gauge transducers register both<br />

grip and load forces. This may be reflecting minor differences in the<br />

object instrumentation or experimental setup. The Weir & MacKenzie<br />

experiments used a strain gauge transducer design similar to that in<br />

Figure 6.16. Our dowels were weighted with buckshot inserts below<br />

the transducing mechanism, whereas Westling and Johansson had<br />

their weights suspended from the instrumented object, below the table<br />

surface. Initially in the loading phase, the load forces were sometimes<br />

negative, indicating that subjects were ‘pushing’ the dowel into the<br />

table surface prior to liftoff, as shown in Figure 6.19. This increased<br />

with object weight such that heavier objects were pushed harder into<br />

the table as forces were first applied, prior to the parallel increase in<br />

grip and load forces. During the loading phase, for heavier compared<br />

to lighter objects, forces were applied for a longer duration, and at a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!