Research Methodology - Dr. Krishan K. Pandey
Research Methodology - Dr. Krishan K. Pandey Research Methodology - Dr. Krishan K. Pandey
Research Design 49 The graph relating to Study I indicates that there is an interaction between the treatment and the level which, in other words, means that the treatment and the level are not independent of each other. The graph relating to Study II shows that there is no interaction effect which means that treatment and level in this study are relatively independent of each other. The 2 × 2 design need not be restricted in the manner as explained above i.e., having one experimental variable and one control variable, but it may also be of the type having two experimental variables or two control variables. For example, a college teacher compared the effect of the classsize as well as the introduction of the new instruction technique on the learning of research methodology. For this purpose he conducted a study using a 2 × 2 simple factorial design. His design in the graphic form would be as follows: Experimental Variable II (Instruction technique) Fig. 3.11 But if the teacher uses a design for comparing males and females and the senior and junior students in the college as they relate to the knowledge of research methodology, in that case we will have a 2 × 2 simple factorial design wherein both the variables are control variables as no manipulation is involved in respect of both the variables. Illustration 2: (4 × 3 simple factorial design). The 4 × 3 simple factorial design will usually include four treatments of the experimental variable and three levels of the control variable. Graphically it may take the following form: Control Variable Level I Level II Level III New Usual 4 × 3 SIMPLE FACTORIAL DESIGN Treatment A Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3 Experimental Variable Treatment B Cell 4 Cell 5 Cell 6 Fig. 3.12 Experimental Variable I (Class Size) Small Usual Treatment C This model of a simple factorial design includes four treatments viz., A, B, C, and D of the experimental variable and three levels viz., I, II, and III of the control variable and has 12 different cells as shown above. This shows that a 2 × 2 simple factorial design can be generalised to any number of treatments and levels. Accordingly we can name it as such and such (–×–) design. In Cell 7 Cell 8 Cell 9 Treatment D Cell 10 Cell 11 Cell 12
50 Research Methodology such a design the means for the columns provide the researcher with an estimate of the main effects for treatments and the means for rows provide an estimate of the main effects for the levels. Such a design also enables the researcher to determine the interaction between treatments and levels. (ii) Complex factorial designs: Experiments with more than two factors at a time involve the use of complex factorial designs. A design which considers three or more independent variables simultaneously is called a complex factorial design. In case of three factors with one experimental variable having two treatments and two control variables, each one of which having two levels, the design used will be termed 2 × 2 × 2 complex factorial design which will contain a total of eight cells as shown below in Fig. 3.13. Control Variable 1 Fig. 3.13 In Fig. 3.14 a pictorial presentation is given of the design shown below. Control Variable I Level I Level II Control Variable 2 Level I Level I Level II 2 × 2 × 2 COMPLEX FACTORIAL DESIGN Level II Control Variable 2 Level I Cell 1 Cell 2 Fig. 3.14 Experimental Variable Treatment A Treatment B Control Variable 2 Level II Cell 3 Cell 4 Control Variable 2 Level I Cell 5 Cell 6 Experimental Variable Treatment A Treatment B Control Variable 2 Level II Cell 7 Cell 8
- Page 16 and 17: Contents xv ANOVA in Latin-Square D
- Page 18 and 19: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 20 and 21: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 22 and 23: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 24 and 25: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 26 and 27: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 28 and 29: Define research problem I Review th
- Page 30 and 31: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 32 and 33: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 34 and 35: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 36 and 37: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 38 and 39: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 40 and 41: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 42 and 43: Defining the Research Problem 25 Ov
- Page 44 and 45: Defining the Research Problem 27 so
- Page 46 and 47: Defining the Research Problem 29 (a
- Page 48 and 49: Research Design 31 MEANING OF RESEA
- Page 50 and 51: Research Design 33 FEATURES OF A GO
- Page 52 and 53: Research Design 35 of students and
- Page 54 and 55: Research Design 37 Now, what sort o
- Page 56 and 57: Research Design 39 The difference b
- Page 58 and 59: Research Design 41 Important Experi
- Page 60 and 61: Research Design 43 extraneous facto
- Page 62 and 63: Research Design 45 From the diagram
- Page 64 and 65: Research Design 47 equal. This redu
- Page 68 and 69: Research Design 51 The dotted line
- Page 70 and 71: Appendix: Developing a Research Pla
- Page 72 and 73: Sampling Design 55 CENSUS AND SAMPL
- Page 74 and 75: Sampling Design 57 would like to ma
- Page 76 and 77: Sampling Design 59 Element selectio
- Page 78 and 79: Sampling Design 61 successive drawi
- Page 80 and 81: Sampling Design 63 The following th
- Page 82 and 83: Sampling Design 65 where C 1 = Cost
- Page 84 and 85: Sampling Design 67 Table 4.1 City n
- Page 86 and 87: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 88 and 89: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 90 and 91: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 92 and 93: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 94 and 95: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 96 and 97: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 98 and 99: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 100 and 101: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 102 and 103: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 104 and 105: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 106 and 107: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 108 and 109: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 110 and 111: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 112 and 113: Methods of Data Collection 95 6 Met
- Page 114 and 115: Methods of Data Collection 97 There
<strong>Research</strong> Design 49<br />
The graph relating to Study I indicates that there is an interaction between the treatment and the<br />
level which, in other words, means that the treatment and the level are not independent of each other.<br />
The graph relating to Study II shows that there is no interaction effect which means that treatment<br />
and level in this study are relatively independent of each other.<br />
The 2 × 2 design need not be restricted in the manner as explained above i.e., having one<br />
experimental variable and one control variable, but it may also be of the type having two experimental<br />
variables or two control variables. For example, a college teacher compared the effect of the classsize<br />
as well as the introduction of the new instruction technique on the learning of research methodology.<br />
For this purpose he conducted a study using a 2 × 2 simple factorial design. His design in the graphic<br />
form would be as follows:<br />
Experimental Variable II<br />
(Instruction technique)<br />
Fig. 3.11<br />
But if the teacher uses a design for comparing males and females and the senior and junior<br />
students in the college as they relate to the knowledge of research methodology, in that case we will<br />
have a 2 × 2 simple factorial design wherein both the variables are control variables as no manipulation<br />
is involved in respect of both the variables.<br />
Illustration 2: (4 × 3 simple factorial design).<br />
The 4 × 3 simple factorial design will usually include four treatments of the experimental variable<br />
and three levels of the control variable. Graphically it may take the following form:<br />
Control<br />
Variable<br />
Level I<br />
Level II<br />
Level III<br />
New<br />
Usual<br />
4 × 3 SIMPLE FACTORIAL DESIGN<br />
Treatment<br />
A<br />
Cell 1<br />
Cell 2<br />
Cell 3<br />
Experimental Variable<br />
Treatment<br />
B<br />
Cell 4<br />
Cell 5<br />
Cell 6<br />
Fig. 3.12<br />
Experimental Variable I<br />
(Class Size)<br />
Small Usual<br />
Treatment<br />
C<br />
This model of a simple factorial design includes four treatments viz., A, B, C, and D of the<br />
experimental variable and three levels viz., I, II, and III of the control variable and has 12 different<br />
cells as shown above. This shows that a 2 × 2 simple factorial design can be generalised to any<br />
number of treatments and levels. Accordingly we can name it as such and such (–×–) design. In<br />
Cell 7<br />
Cell 8<br />
Cell 9<br />
Treatment<br />
D<br />
Cell 10<br />
Cell 11<br />
Cell 12