Research Methodology - Dr. Krishan K. Pandey
Research Methodology - Dr. Krishan K. Pandey Research Methodology - Dr. Krishan K. Pandey
Research Design 43 extraneous factors are included under the heading of chance variation, we refer to the design of experiment as C.R. design. We can present a brief description of the two forms of such a design as given in Fig 3.4. (i) Two-group simple randomized design: In a two-group simple randomized design, first of all the population is defined and then from the population a sample is selected randomly. Further, requirement of this design is that items, after being selected randomly from the population, be randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups (Such random assignment of items to two groups is technically described as principle of randomization). Thus, this design yields two groups as representatives of the population. In a diagram form this design can be shown in this way: Population Randomly Sample selected Randomly assigned Experimental group Control group Fig. 3.4: Two-group simple randomized experimental design (in diagram form) Since in the sample randomized design the elements constituting the sample are randomly drawn from the same population and randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups, it becomes possible to draw conclusions on the basis of samples applicable for the population. The two groups (experimental and control groups) of such a design are given different treatments of the independent variable. This design of experiment is quite common in research studies concerning behavioural sciences. The merit of such a design is that it is simple and randomizes the differences among the sample items. But the limitation of it is that the individual differences among those conducting the treatments are not eliminated, i.e., it does not control the extraneous variable and as such the result of the experiment may not depict a correct picture. This can be illustrated by taking an example. Suppose the researcher wants to compare two groups of students who have been randomly selected and randomly assigned. Two different treatments viz., the usual training and the specialised training are being given to the two groups. The researcher hypothesises greater gains for the group receiving specialised training. To determine this, he tests each group before and after the training, and then compares the amount of gain for the two groups to accept or reject his hypothesis. This is an illustration of the two-groups randomized design, wherein individual differences among students are being randomized. But this does not control the differential effects of the extraneous independent variables (in this case, the individual differences among those conducting the training programme). Treatment A Treatment B Independent variable
44 Research Methodology Population (Available for study) Population (Available to conduct treatments) Random selection Random selection Sample (To be studied) Random assignment Treatment A Group 1 E Group 2 E Group 3 E Group 4 E Group 5 C Group 6 C Group 7 C Group 8 C Independent variable or causal variable Sample (To conduct treatments) Random assignment E = Experimental group C = Control group Treatment B Fig. 3.5: Random replication design (in diagram form) (ii) Random replications design: The limitation of the two-group randomized design is usually eliminated within the random replications design. In the illustration just cited above, the teacher differences on the dependent variable were ignored, i.e., the extraneous variable was not controlled. But in a random replications design, the effect of such differences are minimised (or reduced) by providing a number of repetitions for each treatment. Each repetition is technically called a ‘replication’. Random replication design serves two purposes viz., it provides controls for the differential effects of the extraneous independent variables and secondly, it randomizes any individual differences among those conducting the treatments. Diagrammatically we can illustrate the random replications design thus: (Fig. 3.5)
- Page 10 and 11: Preface to the First Edition ix Pre
- Page 12 and 13: Contents xi Contents Preface to the
- Page 14 and 15: Contents xiii Selection of Appropri
- Page 16 and 17: Contents xv ANOVA in Latin-Square D
- Page 18 and 19: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 20 and 21: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 22 and 23: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 24 and 25: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 26 and 27: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 28 and 29: Define research problem I Review th
- Page 30 and 31: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 32 and 33: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 34 and 35: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 36 and 37: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 38 and 39: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 40 and 41: Research Methodology: An Introducti
- Page 42 and 43: Defining the Research Problem 25 Ov
- Page 44 and 45: Defining the Research Problem 27 so
- Page 46 and 47: Defining the Research Problem 29 (a
- Page 48 and 49: Research Design 31 MEANING OF RESEA
- Page 50 and 51: Research Design 33 FEATURES OF A GO
- Page 52 and 53: Research Design 35 of students and
- Page 54 and 55: Research Design 37 Now, what sort o
- Page 56 and 57: Research Design 39 The difference b
- Page 58 and 59: Research Design 41 Important Experi
- Page 62 and 63: Research Design 45 From the diagram
- Page 64 and 65: Research Design 47 equal. This redu
- Page 66 and 67: Research Design 49 The graph relati
- Page 68 and 69: Research Design 51 The dotted line
- Page 70 and 71: Appendix: Developing a Research Pla
- Page 72 and 73: Sampling Design 55 CENSUS AND SAMPL
- Page 74 and 75: Sampling Design 57 would like to ma
- Page 76 and 77: Sampling Design 59 Element selectio
- Page 78 and 79: Sampling Design 61 successive drawi
- Page 80 and 81: Sampling Design 63 The following th
- Page 82 and 83: Sampling Design 65 where C 1 = Cost
- Page 84 and 85: Sampling Design 67 Table 4.1 City n
- Page 86 and 87: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 88 and 89: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 90 and 91: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 92 and 93: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 94 and 95: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 96 and 97: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 98 and 99: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 100 and 101: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 102 and 103: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 104 and 105: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 106 and 107: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
- Page 108 and 109: Measurement and Scaling Techniques
<strong>Research</strong> Design 43<br />
extraneous factors are included under the heading of chance variation, we refer to the design of<br />
experiment as C.R. design.<br />
We can present a brief description of the two forms of such a design as given in Fig 3.4.<br />
(i) Two-group simple randomized design: In a two-group simple randomized design, first<br />
of all the population is defined and then from the population a sample is selected randomly.<br />
Further, requirement of this design is that items, after being selected randomly from the<br />
population, be randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups (Such random<br />
assignment of items to two groups is technically described as principle of randomization).<br />
Thus, this design yields two groups as representatives of the population. In a diagram form<br />
this design can be shown in this way:<br />
Population<br />
Randomly<br />
Sample<br />
selected<br />
Randomly<br />
assigned<br />
Experimental<br />
group<br />
Control<br />
group<br />
Fig. 3.4: Two-group simple randomized experimental design (in diagram form)<br />
Since in the sample randomized design the elements constituting the sample are randomly<br />
drawn from the same population and randomly assigned to the experimental and control<br />
groups, it becomes possible to draw conclusions on the basis of samples applicable for the<br />
population. The two groups (experimental and control groups) of such a design are given<br />
different treatments of the independent variable. This design of experiment is quite common<br />
in research studies concerning behavioural sciences. The merit of such a design is that it is<br />
simple and randomizes the differences among the sample items. But the limitation of it is<br />
that the individual differences among those conducting the treatments are not eliminated,<br />
i.e., it does not control the extraneous variable and as such the result of the experiment may<br />
not depict a correct picture. This can be illustrated by taking an example. Suppose the<br />
researcher wants to compare two groups of students who have been randomly selected<br />
and randomly assigned. Two different treatments viz., the usual training and the specialised<br />
training are being given to the two groups. The researcher hypothesises greater gains for<br />
the group receiving specialised training. To determine this, he tests each group before and<br />
after the training, and then compares the amount of gain for the two groups to accept or<br />
reject his hypothesis. This is an illustration of the two-groups randomized design, wherein<br />
individual differences among students are being randomized. But this does not control the<br />
differential effects of the extraneous independent variables (in this case, the individual<br />
differences among those conducting the training programme).<br />
Treatment A<br />
Treatment B<br />
Independent variable