Research Methodology - Dr. Krishan K. Pandey
Research Methodology - Dr. Krishan K. Pandey Research Methodology - Dr. Krishan K. Pandey
Testing of Hypotheses I 223 Thus, q 0 = 1 – p 0 = .2727 The test statistic z can be worked out as under: z = p$ −p$ pq n 0 0 1 1 2 pq + n 0 0 2 = 400 400 − 500 600 b. 7273gb. 2727g b. 7273gb. 2727g + 500 600 0133 . = = 4. 926 0. 027 As the H is one-sided we shall determine the rejection region applying one-tailed test (in the right tail a because H is of greater than type) at 5 per cent level and the same works out to as under, using a normal curve area table: R : z > 1.645 The observed value of z is 4.926 which is in the rejection region and so we reject H in favour of H 0 a and conclude that the proportion of smokers after tax has decreased significantly. Testing the difference between proportion based on the sample and the proportion given for the whole population: In such a situation we work out the standard error of difference between proportion of persons possessing an attribute in a sample and the proportion given for the population as under: Standard error of difference between sample proportion and N − n population proportion or S. E. diff . p$ − p = p ⋅ q nN where p = population proportion q = 1 – p n = number of items in the sample N = number of items in population and the test statistic z can be worked out as under: p$ − p z = N − n p ⋅ q nN All other steps remain the same as explained above in the context of testing of proportions. We take an example to illustrate the same. Illustration 18 There are 100 students in a university college and in the whole university, inclusive of this college, the number of students is 2000. In a random sample study 20 were found smokers in the college and the proportion of smokers in the university is 0.05. Is there a significant difference between the proportion of smokers in the college and university? Test at 5 per cent level.
224 Research Methodology Solution: Let H0 : p$ = p (there is no difference between sample proportion and population proportion) and Ha : p$ ≠ p (there is difference between the two proportions) and on the basis of the given information, the test statistic z can be worked out as under: z = p$ − p N − n p ⋅ q nN = 20 − . 05 100 2000 − 100 b. 05gb. 95gb100gb2000g 0150 . = = 7143 . 0. 021 As the H is two-sided, we shall determine the rejection regions applying two-tailed test at 5 per a cent level and the same works out to as under, using normal curve area table: R : | z | > 1.96 The observed value of z is 7.143 which is in the rejection region and as such we reject H and 0 conclude that there is a significant difference between the proportion of smokers in the college and university. HYPOTHESIS TESTING FOR COMPARING A VARIANCE TO SOME HYPOTHESISED POPULATION VARIANCE The test we use for comparing a sample variance to some theoretical or hypothesised variance of population is different than z-test or the t-test. The test we use for this purpose is known as chisquare test and the test statistic symbolised as χ 2 , known as the chi-square value, is worked out. 2 2 The chi-square value to test the null hypothesis viz, H0: σs = σp worked out as under: where σ s 2 = variance of the sample 2 σ p = variance of the population χ 2 2 σs = n − 1 2 σ p b g (n – 1) = degree of freedom, n being the number of items in the sample. Then by comparing the calculated value of χ 2 with its table value for (n – 1) degrees of freedom at a given level of significance, we may either accept H 0 or reject it. If the calculated value of χ 2 is equal to or less than the table value, the null hypothesis is accepted; otherwise the null hypothesis is rejected. This test is based on chi-square distribution which is not symmetrical and all
- Page 190 and 191: Sampling Fundamentals 173 We now il
- Page 192 and 193: Sampling Fundamentals 175 (v) Stand
- Page 194 and 195: Sampling Fundamentals 177 where N =
- Page 196 and 197: Sampling Fundamentals 179 Since $p
- Page 198 and 199: Sampling Fundamentals 181 (i) Find
- Page 200 and 201: Sampling Fundamentals 183 25. A tea
- Page 202 and 203: Testing of Hypotheses I 185 Charact
- Page 204 and 205: Testing of Hypotheses I 187 when th
- Page 206 and 207: Testing of Hypotheses I 189 Mathema
- Page 208 and 209: Testing of Hypotheses I 191 PROCEDU
- Page 210 and 211: Testing of Hypotheses I 193 MEASURI
- Page 212 and 213: Testing of Hypotheses I 195 We can
- Page 214 and 215: Testing of Hypotheses I 197 HYPOTHE
- Page 216 and 217: 1 2 3 4 5 z OR X − X 1 2 2 2 p p
- Page 218 and 219: 1 2 3 4 5 z = p q 0 0 p$ − p$ F H
- Page 220 and 221: Testing of Hypotheses I 203 to have
- Page 222 and 223: Testing of Hypotheses I 205 S. No.
- Page 224 and 225: Testing of Hypotheses I 207 S. No.
- Page 226 and 227: Testing of Hypotheses I 209 nX + nX
- Page 228 and 229: Testing of Hypotheses I 211 (Since
- Page 230 and 231: Testing of Hypotheses I 213 Table 9
- Page 232 and 233: Testing of Hypotheses I 215 σ diff
- Page 234 and 235: Testing of Hypotheses I 217 Solutio
- Page 236 and 237: Testing of Hypotheses I 219 Hence t
- Page 238 and 239: Testing of Hypotheses I 221 of succ
- Page 242 and 243: Testing of Hypotheses I 225 the val
- Page 244 and 245: Testing of Hypotheses I 227 and 2 X
- Page 246 and 247: Testing of Hypotheses I 229 LIMITAT
- Page 248 and 249: Testing of Hypotheses I 231 20. Ten
- Page 250 and 251: Chi-square Test 233 10 Chi-Square T
- Page 252 and 253: Chi-square Test 235 S. No. 1 2 3 4
- Page 254 and 255: Chi-square Test 237 As a test of go
- Page 256 and 257: Chi-square Test 239 (i) First of al
- Page 258 and 259: Chi-square Test 241 The expected fr
- Page 260 and 261: Chi-square Test 243 Show that the s
- Page 262 and 263: Chi-square Test 245 Events or Expec
- Page 264 and 265: Chi-square Test 247 c h χ 2 N ⋅
- Page 266 and 267: Chi-square Test 249 from a number o
- Page 268 and 269: Chi-square Test 251 Questions 1. Wh
- Page 270 and 271: Chi-square Test 253 No. of boys 5 4
- Page 272 and 273: Chi-square Test 255 23. For the dat
- Page 274 and 275: Analysis of Variance and Co-varianc
- Page 276 and 277: Analysis of Variance and Co-varianc
- Page 278 and 279: Analysis of Variance and Co-varianc
- Page 280 and 281: Analysis of Variance and Co-varianc
- Page 282 and 283: Analysis of Variance and Co-varianc
- Page 284 and 285: Analysis of Variance and Co-varianc
- Page 286 and 287: Analysis of Variance and Co-varianc
- Page 288 and 289: Analysis of Variance and Co-varianc
224 <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Methodology</strong><br />
Solution: Let H0 : p$ = p (there is no difference between sample proportion and population proportion)<br />
and Ha : p$ ≠ p (there is difference between the two proportions)<br />
and on the basis of the given information, the test statistic z can be worked out as under:<br />
z =<br />
p$ − p<br />
N − n<br />
p ⋅ q<br />
nN<br />
=<br />
20<br />
− . 05<br />
100<br />
2000 − 100 b. 05gb. 95gb100gb2000g 0150 .<br />
= = 7143 .<br />
0. 021<br />
As the H is two-sided, we shall determine the rejection regions applying two-tailed test at 5 per<br />
a<br />
cent level and the same works out to as under, using normal curve area table:<br />
R : | z | > 1.96<br />
The observed value of z is 7.143 which is in the rejection region and as such we reject H and 0<br />
conclude that there is a significant difference between the proportion of smokers in the college and<br />
university.<br />
HYPOTHESIS TESTING FOR COMPARING A VARIANCE<br />
TO SOME HYPOTHESISED POPULATION VARIANCE<br />
The test we use for comparing a sample variance to some theoretical or hypothesised variance of<br />
population is different than z-test or the t-test. The test we use for this purpose is known as chisquare<br />
test and the test statistic symbolised as χ 2 , known as the chi-square value, is worked out.<br />
2 2<br />
The chi-square value to test the null hypothesis viz, H0: σs = σp<br />
worked out as under:<br />
where σ s 2 = variance of the sample<br />
2<br />
σ p = variance of the population<br />
χ<br />
2<br />
2<br />
σs<br />
= n − 1<br />
2<br />
σ<br />
p<br />
b g<br />
(n – 1) = degree of freedom, n being the number of items in the sample.<br />
Then by comparing the calculated value of χ 2 with its table value for (n – 1) degrees of<br />
freedom at a given level of significance, we may either accept H 0 or reject it. If the calculated value<br />
of χ 2 is equal to or less than the table value, the null hypothesis is accepted; otherwise the null<br />
hypothesis is rejected. This test is based on chi-square distribution which is not symmetrical and all