Research Methodology - Dr. Krishan K. Pandey
Research Methodology - Dr. Krishan K. Pandey Research Methodology - Dr. Krishan K. Pandey
Testing of Hypotheses I 215 σ diff . = Standard deviation of differences n = Number of matched pairs This calculated value of t is compared with its table value at a given level of significance as usual for testing purposes. We can also use Sandler’s A-test for this very purpose as stated earlier in Chapter 8. Illustration 11 Memory capacity of 9 students was tested before and after training. State at 5 per cent level of significance whether the training was effective from the following scores: Student 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Before 10 15 9 3 7 12 16 17 4 After 12 17 8 5 6 11 18 20 3 Use paired t-test as well as A-test for your answer. Solution: Take the score before training as X and the score after training as Y and then taking the null hypothesis that the mean of difference is zero, we can write: H : μ μ 0 1= 2 which is equivalent to test H : D = 0 0 H : μ μ a 1 < 2 (as we want to conclude that training has been effective) As we are having matched pairs, we use paired t-test and work out the test statistic t as under: D − 0 t = σ . / n diff To find the value of t, we shall first have to work out the mean and standard deviation of differences as shown below: Table 9.8 Student Score before Score after Difference Difference training training Squared 2 X Y (D = X – Y ) i i i i i Di 1 10 12 – 2 4 2 15 17 – 2 4 3 9 8 1 1 4 3 5 – 2 4 5 7 6 1 1 6 12 11 1 1 7 16 18 – 2 4 8 17 20 – 3 9 9 4 3 1 1 2 n = 9 ∑ Di = −7 ∑ Di = 29
216 Research Methodology Di ∴ Mean of Differences or D = n ∑ and Standard deviation of differences or = − 7 =−0. 778 9 DiD n σdiff . n = ∑ − ⋅ − 1 = 2 di 29 − − . 778 × 9 9 − 1 2 b g = 2. 944 = 1715 . − − Hence, t = = − 0. 778 0 . 778 =−1361 . 1715 . / 9 0. 572 Degrees of freedom = n – 1 = 9 – 1 = 8. As H is one-sided, we shall apply a one-tailed test (in the left tail because H is of less than type) a a for determining the rejection region at 5 per cent level which comes to as under, using the table of t-distribution for 8 degrees of freedom: R : t < – 1.860 The observed value of t is –1.361 which is in the acceptance region and thus, we accept H and 0 conclude that the difference in score before and after training is insignificant i.e., it is only due to sampling fluctuations. Hence we can infer that the training was not effective. Solution using A-test: Using A-test, we workout the test statistic for the given problem thus: Di A = Di ∑ 2 29 = = 0. 592 2 2 b∑g b−7g Since H in the given problem is one-sided, we shall apply one-tailed test. Accordingly, at 5% level of a significance the table value of A-statistic for (n – 1) or (9 – 1) = 8 d.f. in the given case is 0.368 (as per table of A-statistic given in appendix). The computed value of A i.e., 0.592 is higher than this table value and as such A-statistic is insignificant and accordingly H should be accepted. In other words, 0 we should conclude that the training was not effective. (This inference is just the same as drawn earlier using paired t-test.) Illustration 12 The sales data of an item in six shops before and after a special promotional campaign are: Shops A B C D E F Before the promotional campaign 53 28 31 48 50 42 After the campaign 58 29 30 55 56 45 Can the campaign be judged to be a success? Test at 5 per cent level of significance. Use paired t-test as well as A-test. 2
- Page 182 and 183: Sampling Fundamentals 165 (ii) Stan
- Page 184 and 185: Sampling Fundamentals 167 σ s 1⋅
- Page 186 and 187: Sampling Fundamentals 169 mean is c
- Page 188 and 189: Sampling Fundamentals 171 08 . = ×
- Page 190 and 191: Sampling Fundamentals 173 We now il
- Page 192 and 193: Sampling Fundamentals 175 (v) Stand
- Page 194 and 195: Sampling Fundamentals 177 where N =
- Page 196 and 197: Sampling Fundamentals 179 Since $p
- Page 198 and 199: Sampling Fundamentals 181 (i) Find
- Page 200 and 201: Sampling Fundamentals 183 25. A tea
- Page 202 and 203: Testing of Hypotheses I 185 Charact
- Page 204 and 205: Testing of Hypotheses I 187 when th
- Page 206 and 207: Testing of Hypotheses I 189 Mathema
- Page 208 and 209: Testing of Hypotheses I 191 PROCEDU
- Page 210 and 211: Testing of Hypotheses I 193 MEASURI
- Page 212 and 213: Testing of Hypotheses I 195 We can
- Page 214 and 215: Testing of Hypotheses I 197 HYPOTHE
- Page 216 and 217: 1 2 3 4 5 z OR X − X 1 2 2 2 p p
- Page 218 and 219: 1 2 3 4 5 z = p q 0 0 p$ − p$ F H
- Page 220 and 221: Testing of Hypotheses I 203 to have
- Page 222 and 223: Testing of Hypotheses I 205 S. No.
- Page 224 and 225: Testing of Hypotheses I 207 S. No.
- Page 226 and 227: Testing of Hypotheses I 209 nX + nX
- Page 228 and 229: Testing of Hypotheses I 211 (Since
- Page 230 and 231: Testing of Hypotheses I 213 Table 9
- Page 234 and 235: Testing of Hypotheses I 217 Solutio
- Page 236 and 237: Testing of Hypotheses I 219 Hence t
- Page 238 and 239: Testing of Hypotheses I 221 of succ
- Page 240 and 241: Testing of Hypotheses I 223 Thus, q
- Page 242 and 243: Testing of Hypotheses I 225 the val
- Page 244 and 245: Testing of Hypotheses I 227 and 2 X
- Page 246 and 247: Testing of Hypotheses I 229 LIMITAT
- Page 248 and 249: Testing of Hypotheses I 231 20. Ten
- Page 250 and 251: Chi-square Test 233 10 Chi-Square T
- Page 252 and 253: Chi-square Test 235 S. No. 1 2 3 4
- Page 254 and 255: Chi-square Test 237 As a test of go
- Page 256 and 257: Chi-square Test 239 (i) First of al
- Page 258 and 259: Chi-square Test 241 The expected fr
- Page 260 and 261: Chi-square Test 243 Show that the s
- Page 262 and 263: Chi-square Test 245 Events or Expec
- Page 264 and 265: Chi-square Test 247 c h χ 2 N ⋅
- Page 266 and 267: Chi-square Test 249 from a number o
- Page 268 and 269: Chi-square Test 251 Questions 1. Wh
- Page 270 and 271: Chi-square Test 253 No. of boys 5 4
- Page 272 and 273: Chi-square Test 255 23. For the dat
- Page 274 and 275: Analysis of Variance and Co-varianc
- Page 276 and 277: Analysis of Variance and Co-varianc
- Page 278 and 279: Analysis of Variance and Co-varianc
- Page 280 and 281: Analysis of Variance and Co-varianc
216 <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Methodology</strong><br />
Di<br />
∴ Mean of Differences or D =<br />
n<br />
∑<br />
and Standard deviation of differences or<br />
= − 7<br />
=−0.<br />
778<br />
9<br />
DiD n<br />
σdiff .<br />
n<br />
= ∑ − ⋅<br />
− 1<br />
=<br />
2<br />
di<br />
29 − − . 778 × 9<br />
9 − 1<br />
2<br />
b g<br />
= 2. 944 = 1715 .<br />
− −<br />
Hence, t = = −<br />
0. 778 0 . 778<br />
=−1361<br />
.<br />
1715 . / 9 0. 572<br />
Degrees of freedom = n – 1 = 9 – 1 = 8.<br />
As H is one-sided, we shall apply a one-tailed test (in the left tail because H is of less than type)<br />
a a<br />
for determining the rejection region at 5 per cent level which comes to as under, using the table of<br />
t-distribution for 8 degrees of freedom:<br />
R : t < – 1.860<br />
The observed value of t is –1.361 which is in the acceptance region and thus, we accept H and 0<br />
conclude that the difference in score before and after training is insignificant i.e., it is only due to<br />
sampling fluctuations. Hence we can infer that the training was not effective.<br />
Solution using A-test: Using A-test, we workout the test statistic for the given problem thus:<br />
Di<br />
A =<br />
Di<br />
∑<br />
2<br />
29<br />
= = 0. 592<br />
2 2 b∑g b−7g Since H in the given problem is one-sided, we shall apply one-tailed test. Accordingly, at 5% level of<br />
a<br />
significance the table value of A-statistic for (n – 1) or (9 – 1) = 8 d.f. in the given case is 0.368 (as<br />
per table of A-statistic given in appendix). The computed value of A i.e., 0.592 is higher than this table<br />
value and as such A-statistic is insignificant and accordingly H should be accepted. In other words,<br />
0<br />
we should conclude that the training was not effective. (This inference is just the same as drawn<br />
earlier using paired t-test.)<br />
Illustration 12<br />
The sales data of an item in six shops before and after a special promotional campaign are:<br />
Shops A B C D E F<br />
Before the promotional campaign 53 28 31 48 50 42<br />
After the campaign 58 29 30 55 56 45<br />
Can the campaign be judged to be a success? Test at 5 per cent level of significance. Use paired<br />
t-test as well as A-test.<br />
2