Research Methodology - Dr. Krishan K. Pandey
Research Methodology - Dr. Krishan K. Pandey Research Methodology - Dr. Krishan K. Pandey
Testing of Hypotheses I 211 (Since the population variances are not known, we have used the sample variances, considering the sample variances as the estimates of population variances.) Hence z = 695 − 710 40 200 + 60 175 =− 2 2 bg bg . 15 =−2. 809 8 + 2057 As H a is two-sided, we shall apply a two-tailed test for determining the rejection regions at 5 per cent level of significance which come to as under, using normal curve area table: R : | z | > 1.96 The observed value of z is – 2.809 which falls in the rejection region and thus we reject H 0 at 5 per cent level and conclude that earning of workers in the two cities differ significantly. Illustration 9 Sample of sales in similar shops in two towns are taken for a new product with the following results: Town Mean sales Variance Size of sample A 57 5.3 5 B 61 4.8 7 Is there any evidence of difference in sales in the two towns? Use 5 per cent level of significance for testing this difference between the means of two samples. Solution: Taking the null hypothesis that the means of two populations do not differ we can write: and the given information as follows: Sample from town A as sample one X 1 57 = Sample from town B As sample two X 2 61 = H : μ μ 0 1= 2 H : μ μ a 1≠ 2 Table 9.6 2 σ s1 2 σ s2 53 = . n 1 = 5 48 = . n 2 = 7 Since in the given question variances of the population are not known and the size of samples is small, we shall use t-test for difference in means, assuming the populations to be normal and can work out the test statistic t as under: with d.f. = (n 1 + n 2 – 2) t = X − X 1 2 2 2 b g b g n1− 1 σs + n2 − 1 σs 1 1 1 2 × + n + n − 2 n n 1 2 1 2
212 Research Methodology = 57 − 61 453 b . g + 648 b . g 1 × + 5 + 7 − 2 5 1 7 =−3. 053 Degrees of freedom = (n 1 + n 2 – 2) = 5 + 7 – 2 = 10 As H a is two-sided, we shall apply a two-tailed test for determining the rejection regions at 5 per cent level which come to as under, using table of t-distribution for 10 degrees of freedom: R : | t | > 2.228 The observed value of t is – 3.053 which falls in the rejection region and thus, we reject H 0 and conclude that the difference in sales in the two towns is significant at 5 per cent level. Illustration 10 A group of seven-week old chickens reared on a high protein diet weigh 12, 15, 11, 16, 14, 14, and 16 ounces; a second group of five chickens, similarly treated except that they receive a low protein diet, weigh 8, 10, 14, 10 and 13 ounces. Test at 5 per cent level whether there is significant evidence that additional protein has increased the weight of the chickens. Use assumed mean (or A 1 ) = 10 for the sample of 7 and assumed mean (or A 2 ) = 8 for the sample of 5 chickens in your calculations. Solution: Taking the null hypothesis that additional protein has not increased the weight of the chickens we can write: H : μ μ 0 1= 2 H : μ μ a 1> 2 (as we want to conclude that additional protein has increased the weight of chickens) Since in the given question variances of the populations are not known and the size of samples is small, we shall use t-test for difference in means, assuming the populations to be normal and thus work out the test statistic t as under: with d.f. = (n 1 + n 2 – 2) t = X − X 1 2 2 2 b g b g n1− 1 σs + n2 − 1 σs 1 1 1 2 × + n + n − 2 n n 1 2 1 2 2 2 From the sample data we work out X1, X2, σ s and σ (taking high protein diet sample as 1 s2 sample one and low protein diet sample as sample two) as shown below:
- Page 178 and 179: Sampling Fundamentals 161 (ii) To t
- Page 180 and 181: Sampling Fundamentals 163 2 (ii) Sq
- Page 182 and 183: Sampling Fundamentals 165 (ii) Stan
- Page 184 and 185: Sampling Fundamentals 167 σ s 1⋅
- Page 186 and 187: Sampling Fundamentals 169 mean is c
- Page 188 and 189: Sampling Fundamentals 171 08 . = ×
- Page 190 and 191: Sampling Fundamentals 173 We now il
- Page 192 and 193: Sampling Fundamentals 175 (v) Stand
- Page 194 and 195: Sampling Fundamentals 177 where N =
- Page 196 and 197: Sampling Fundamentals 179 Since $p
- Page 198 and 199: Sampling Fundamentals 181 (i) Find
- Page 200 and 201: Sampling Fundamentals 183 25. A tea
- Page 202 and 203: Testing of Hypotheses I 185 Charact
- Page 204 and 205: Testing of Hypotheses I 187 when th
- Page 206 and 207: Testing of Hypotheses I 189 Mathema
- Page 208 and 209: Testing of Hypotheses I 191 PROCEDU
- Page 210 and 211: Testing of Hypotheses I 193 MEASURI
- Page 212 and 213: Testing of Hypotheses I 195 We can
- Page 214 and 215: Testing of Hypotheses I 197 HYPOTHE
- Page 216 and 217: 1 2 3 4 5 z OR X − X 1 2 2 2 p p
- Page 218 and 219: 1 2 3 4 5 z = p q 0 0 p$ − p$ F H
- Page 220 and 221: Testing of Hypotheses I 203 to have
- Page 222 and 223: Testing of Hypotheses I 205 S. No.
- Page 224 and 225: Testing of Hypotheses I 207 S. No.
- Page 226 and 227: Testing of Hypotheses I 209 nX + nX
- Page 230 and 231: Testing of Hypotheses I 213 Table 9
- Page 232 and 233: Testing of Hypotheses I 215 σ diff
- Page 234 and 235: Testing of Hypotheses I 217 Solutio
- Page 236 and 237: Testing of Hypotheses I 219 Hence t
- Page 238 and 239: Testing of Hypotheses I 221 of succ
- Page 240 and 241: Testing of Hypotheses I 223 Thus, q
- Page 242 and 243: Testing of Hypotheses I 225 the val
- Page 244 and 245: Testing of Hypotheses I 227 and 2 X
- Page 246 and 247: Testing of Hypotheses I 229 LIMITAT
- Page 248 and 249: Testing of Hypotheses I 231 20. Ten
- Page 250 and 251: Chi-square Test 233 10 Chi-Square T
- Page 252 and 253: Chi-square Test 235 S. No. 1 2 3 4
- Page 254 and 255: Chi-square Test 237 As a test of go
- Page 256 and 257: Chi-square Test 239 (i) First of al
- Page 258 and 259: Chi-square Test 241 The expected fr
- Page 260 and 261: Chi-square Test 243 Show that the s
- Page 262 and 263: Chi-square Test 245 Events or Expec
- Page 264 and 265: Chi-square Test 247 c h χ 2 N ⋅
- Page 266 and 267: Chi-square Test 249 from a number o
- Page 268 and 269: Chi-square Test 251 Questions 1. Wh
- Page 270 and 271: Chi-square Test 253 No. of boys 5 4
- Page 272 and 273: Chi-square Test 255 23. For the dat
- Page 274 and 275: Analysis of Variance and Co-varianc
- Page 276 and 277: Analysis of Variance and Co-varianc
Testing of Hypotheses I 211<br />
(Since the population variances are not known, we have used the sample variances, considering<br />
the sample variances as the estimates of population variances.)<br />
Hence z =<br />
695 − 710<br />
40<br />
200<br />
+<br />
60<br />
175<br />
=−<br />
2 2 bg bg .<br />
15<br />
=−2.<br />
809<br />
8 + 2057<br />
As H a is two-sided, we shall apply a two-tailed test for determining the rejection regions at 5 per<br />
cent level of significance which come to as under, using normal curve area table:<br />
R : | z | > 1.96<br />
The observed value of z is – 2.809 which falls in the rejection region and thus we reject H 0 at<br />
5 per cent level and conclude that earning of workers in the two cities differ significantly.<br />
Illustration 9<br />
Sample of sales in similar shops in two towns are taken for a new product with the following results:<br />
Town Mean sales Variance Size of sample<br />
A 57 5.3 5<br />
B 61 4.8 7<br />
Is there any evidence of difference in sales in the two towns? Use 5 per cent level of significance<br />
for testing this difference between the means of two samples.<br />
Solution: Taking the null hypothesis that the means of two populations do not differ we can write:<br />
and the given information as follows:<br />
Sample from town A<br />
as sample one X 1 57<br />
=<br />
Sample from town B<br />
As sample two X 2 61<br />
=<br />
H : μ μ<br />
0 1= 2<br />
H : μ μ<br />
a 1≠ 2<br />
Table 9.6<br />
2<br />
σ s1<br />
2<br />
σ s2<br />
53<br />
= . n 1 = 5<br />
48<br />
= . n 2 = 7<br />
Since in the given question variances of the population are not known and the size of samples is<br />
small, we shall use t-test for difference in means, assuming the populations to be normal and can<br />
work out the test statistic t as under:<br />
with d.f. = (n 1 + n 2 – 2)<br />
t =<br />
X − X<br />
1 2<br />
2<br />
2 b g b g<br />
n1− 1 σs + n2<br />
− 1 σs<br />
1 1<br />
1 2 × +<br />
n + n − 2 n n<br />
1 2 1 2