You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
y the Presldent snd lts members to be<br />
conflrmeal by the SenEte.<br />
Wtthout any pressure, if I mBy say to<br />
the Eentlehen from Illinols, but simply<br />
aa a resrl]t Df d|^qttl$slons I had with rep-<br />
goes through the proeess of recomendation<br />
by the l,rcslde[t, plus the advlce<br />
End con$ent of the SenBt€, that trus<br />
council lnileecl will have nationEl prestlce,<br />
end we wlll get the best posslble<br />
resentatives of the Department of Comrlerce,<br />
I changed my mlnd Bs to the edvlsabillty<br />
of havln8 the President appolnt<br />
members on this Councll.<br />
Bear ln mind thls; Whether you have<br />
It by the Hethod suggested by the gen-<br />
the coundil. The Colnmerce Dcpartment tleman frotn llllnols, or whether you<br />
tried to polnt out to me wtrtt it felt were<br />
the deflclencie.s in,the amendment as lt<br />
wlll leave lt es lt ls presently ln the blll.<br />
you are not dlmlnishine one lota the<br />
ms flrst ofiered. f Bgreed with the Department<br />
<strong>and</strong> offered afl ameltdlnent to<br />
change the provision from having the<br />
Euthority or the power of the <strong>Sec</strong>retary<br />
of Comhetce.<br />
Ttre gentleman from Florlda knows full<br />
President appoint thc Councll to having well that the flnal authorlty ls vested<br />
the <strong>Sec</strong>retery apFint the fnembtrs.<br />
First of all, the pur!)o$e of this Coun-<br />
ln the <strong>Sec</strong>retary.<br />
more meanlngful<br />
But I belleve it wlU be<br />
to heve thls Advisory<br />
cil ls to a.alvlse the Effretrry. It i$ not t,o<br />
edvise the Preslalent. It is not to advlse<br />
Cduncll<br />
Es my<br />
eppointed by the sEme method<br />
frlend from Florlda originally<br />
the cabinet. It ls to edvLse the <strong>Sec</strong>re- susgest€d.<br />
tary of Commerce, on trying to set, st<strong>and</strong>- I latl thus far to Bee the aleflclerlcles<br />
Brals.<br />
Where do u,e place the responslblllty<br />
ln thls blU for the setting of st<strong>and</strong>ard$?<br />
We do not place it in the Presidrnt-we<br />
plece it ln the <strong>Sec</strong>retary of conmerce,<br />
<strong>and</strong> lt ls hls full responsibilit]* It ls only<br />
riEht that he shottld dptloint this Hroup<br />
to help advise him. Thet ls aU it is. He<br />
does not havc to fficept their adviceor<br />
he may accept their Edvice lf he 60<br />
desires- It is slmnly an advisory mmmlttee<br />
Ior the SeEretRry.<br />
Fufthermore, I think re are protected<br />
under the terms o[ oflice in that we tuve<br />
that suddenly manlfested theftselves betwen<br />
the orlglnal pfopcsal <strong>and</strong> the ltrstmlnut.e<br />
succestion wtdch Just passed by<br />
the skin of lts t€eth with a 13-to-12 vote.<br />
I would urge the commlttee to adopt<br />
the Emendment, of the gentlemen ffom<br />
Illinols. It wlll eive us a strongrer blll.<br />
It Elll not diminlsh the authority of the<br />
<strong>Sec</strong>retary of Commerce at aU. f believe<br />
It wlll edd lmtneasurebly to the pre5tigs<br />
of thi$ Advi6ory Council as they try to<br />
wrestle wlth thls trefirendously tnportant<br />
problem c'lttl which we a.re confronteal.<br />
certaln set terrns, Bnd lndependence<br />
enouglt for &ny Edvisory comEllttee- we<br />
glve them stt terru that the rnelnbers<br />
will serue. We have precedent for thnt.<br />
That is the same way lt is tlone in the<br />
Public Health Service, the Surgeon Generel<br />
Bppoints the fldvisory commlttee to<br />
edvlse rum. In the Depaltment of Defen*<br />
we have the 6a.me sort of setup-<br />
Ttre adr.1sory commlttees there Ere e.Fpointed<br />
by the <strong>Sec</strong>retery, end not by the<br />
President.<br />
I thlnk thet an overall view of the purpose<br />
of the Safety Advisory Cduxcll 8s<br />
st out In the propo6ed bill td Edvlse the<br />
secretary, who tras the full responsibiltty,<br />
is exactly ffi the commlttee $hould be<br />
appointEal <strong>and</strong> set up.<br />
I would uge very vigorouslr- the defeat<br />
o{ the amendment ffi profnsed by the<br />
gentleman from lllinols.<br />
Mr. WATBON. Mr. Chelman, I move<br />
to stdke the last word.<br />
Mr. Chaiman, my friend frorn !'loflda<br />
knows full weu the trigh esteem that I<br />
h&ve fof hlrn, ftnd certainly I for one<br />
wauld nevet lmpugn his motives.<br />
But f well recall, Es I am gure tlhe<br />
other members of the committe wiu<br />
rmall, the Der5ueslveness End the eloquence<br />
of t'he gentleman from Florida<br />
when he flrst propo$ed this Aalvlsory<br />
Council. It was hls lcleE tlral, lt be eppolnted<br />
by the Presldent, vrlth the edr'lc€<br />
Bfld con$ent of the Senate. He dld en<br />
Mr. ROGERS of florlda. Mr. Chelrhsn,<br />
wlll the gentlem&n yletd?<br />
Mr. WATSON. I yield to my friend,<br />
the gentleman from Florida.<br />
Mr. ROGERS of Florids. I thank my<br />
frlend, the gentleman from South Caro-<br />
Ilna. I would sy ttEt tt was not Just<br />
at the la$t day. Of course, the substltute<br />
was put ln the lsst day, but there were<br />
discu.sslons before that.<br />
Mr. WATSON. I anl sure the geniletrran<br />
knows there was later dlscusslon<br />
aftrr your oriHinal proposal.<br />
Mr. ROGER-S of Fldrlde. Yes.<br />
Mr. WATSON. And then lt was voted<br />
down on that occaslon. It wes tlenled.<br />
Mr. ROGEFTS of Florlda. Yes.<br />
Mr. WATSQN. And lt wBs narrowly<br />
pessed on the lest day.<br />
Mf. ROGEFi,S of Florida. A-ll I wanted<br />
to say was Urat at that tlfte I hsd made<br />
the chhnse. But, no mEtt€r, the frct,<br />
thRt I nr$t proposed it, a$ you say, I alld<br />
have the Presldent aprrolnt them.<br />
In further considerBtion of that questlon<br />
I felt it would not be wise. ff we<br />
would give this council the ri8ht to set<br />
the stmdards them.selves <strong>and</strong> thc rcsponsibiltty<br />
to do that, lJren f would<br />
egree with the gentle.man thet lt should<br />
be a pre$identially a.ppolflted body.<br />
Irosever, in a sltuation where we s'lll<br />
have Edven the a,uthority to <strong>and</strong> will hold<br />
the <strong>Sec</strong>fetary responsiblc, surely lt is<br />
only proper that thc advisory body<br />
excellcnt .iob. He convinced us on lt.<br />
rt w6s not untll the last day the.t they<br />
ceme beck wlth the idea thst the Council<br />
must be appolated by the <strong>Sec</strong>retarT.<br />
should be appointed<br />
.WATSONby<br />
him.<br />
Mr.<br />
I refuse to yteld further.<br />
If I miEht make this sta.tement In<br />
reply, I m gure the gentlemsn lrom<br />
Now, Iet me sEy sthy I can supFort tho<br />
Ernendmeflt, of the gentleman from 11-<br />
Ilrols. We hBve e seflous problem con-<br />
Florid& wlll nsree wlth rhe thBt En fldvisort/<br />
council appoint€d by t.he Presldent<br />
with the advlce End consent of the<br />
frontlng us. I want thl6 Advi6ory Couholl<br />
to h8ve Es much prestlge End rrrpect<br />
aB pos8lble, I flmly belleve thet lf lt<br />
Sendte wou-ld certBjnly be Inore of e.<br />
prestige councll thrin one whlch ,s Eppolnted<br />
by the <strong>Sec</strong>retary of Coumerce.<br />
766 Vol,I