17.01.2013 Views

LegHist.PL89-563.Volume.ONE.Sec.Ten.and

LegHist.PL89-563.Volume.ONE.Sec.Ten.and

LegHist.PL89-563.Volume.ONE.Sec.Ten.and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ebout both tlte eccusation8 end the Bly<br />

lnferences that I have heard hnd read<br />

about the wotkers end Eranf,gement of<br />

the autoftobi;e industry. I do not llke<br />

the lnference tirat the industry <strong>and</strong> the<br />

wortsers ere not deeply con$cious of<br />

E6fety. Ahyone who talls you l,his $lmply<br />

has not been ln an autohobile pl8.tit<br />

or is distorting the truth.<br />

In coDclusion, I would simply suggeet<br />

to tny colleaBues that when you leave<br />

the Chamber t0 return to your homes<br />

toniglrt <strong>and</strong> you lasten your seatbelts<br />

Bnd lock your car doors lor by d.oil\g<br />

this y6s wlll probably be doing $ymbollcally<br />

as much for aulo safely as Efly plece<br />

of legislation that csn be wrttten. Certalnly,<br />

this is a far more constructlve<br />

<strong>and</strong> efiectire approsch than all the<br />

soapbox oratory, the etnotionEl appeal$<br />

<strong>and</strong> the search lor *apegoats End con-<br />

Eplracies that have pr€yed upon the<br />

lesltlmate corceln of all Asrerlcans lor<br />

sefety on ouf hlgh\.l ays. I erh personally<br />

satisfled that es a result of the debate ln<br />

<strong>and</strong> out of Congres, the charges rhade<br />

ln recent rnonth.s against the dutomobile<br />

workers <strong>and</strong> industry have been exposed<br />

to the Amerlcan people as gro6s over-<br />

6ljnpllfications.<br />

Mr. SPRINGER. Mr. Chalrman, I<br />

yield 3 tninute$ to the sentleman from<br />

New York IMr'. iIALPERN].<br />

Mr. HALPERN. Mr. Chalrman, I<br />

would llke to exFress By full enil enthuslmtic<br />

support for th€ proposd Natlonal<br />

Traffic snd Motor Vehicle S8fety Act. of<br />

1966. Slnce the days when I was a memb€r<br />

of the New York Stat€ Eenat+, where<br />

I served for E years E-s chd.hrnan of the<br />

Joint Ifgt$letlve Commiitee on Motor<br />

Vehlcles. I hete edyocat€d a more active<br />

goverrufi€ntsl role ln enmu'aginEl trBllic<br />

safety. f have ln the past introduced<br />

leslsletion similar ln efiect to the trafiic<br />

E8fety bill. Thts bill, along with the<br />

hiehv'ay safety b'll wNch we B'1ll consider<br />

next, represenls the long overdue<br />

f,nd vltelly necesB&ry Federal resrnh$e to<br />

a problefrt e,s old s Our entu'y- we<br />

Ehoulil pas$ lt es weU as lts compehlon<br />

hlchwey sbfety blll, ln ffi stronEt B form<br />

as possible-<br />

Since I900 more then 1.5 mlllion Amerlcans<br />

trEve died ln traftc trcid€nttssub-<br />

Etsntlfllly more than the number oI ca6ualties<br />

ln ell Ameflcsn wars; Certelnly<br />

this ls an astonishlng, almost lncredlble<br />

tr&gedy.<br />

Whet 16 even more importallt, tl)ough,<br />

ls thet the problem of tramc safety-or<br />

FerhaFs better put, the problem of the<br />

lack of trafnc ssfety sderu to be growlng<br />

more <strong>and</strong> more serlouB. In the 1960's<br />

there has btrn e shBrD rlse ln fatalltles<br />

compared to the reletlvGly Bteble Ferlod<br />

of ttlc 1950's when the aillual numb€t<br />

of deaths already ran6ged between the<br />

horrendou flFures of 35,000 Bnd 39,000.<br />

Accolding to the Natlons) salety Councll,<br />

lagt year, In 1965, 49,000 Aherlcaro<br />

were killed in trafnc sccidcntE. Futher.<br />

1-8 miulon were disbled <strong>and</strong> another<br />

1.8 mlulon suflered minor lnjurie$. The<br />

eggregate mst of the nccidents was estimateal<br />

at $8.5 btllton in prcperty alamage,<br />

wege8 lost, medlcal exp€ns€s, end lnsuance<br />

pelmenf,s-<br />

Thffie few brlel Etatl8tlcs 6peak tor<br />

them8€lved. I a.m fllre all of you are<br />

Tamdlar slth their me$$age, Whatever<br />

eflofls to promotr tra,fic ae.Iety heve so<br />

fEr been underteken, whether by industry,<br />

nonproflt org&ni?ation, or State or<br />

lftal gorerrutent, thesc efforts have unlorLurtstely<br />

proyed lnadequate. Something<br />

more must be done, ud the Federal<br />

Goverment must, mEke sure thet lt<br />

is done. Oiherr'lse, e.cmrdinE to expert<br />

analysls, the cu-rrent, average of 1,000<br />

hlghwBy datlr$ per week wlll double ln<br />

t}le next decede. It Is not utresonEble<br />

to estlm8te that unlN efiecLive Federal<br />

Sctlol\ ls taken, deaill\ on the NatiLon's<br />

}iEhways may re6+h I00,000 anltue.lly by<br />

l9?5.<br />

There is, of coul'se, ho Blngle cause of<br />

tra.frc rccidenls; <strong>and</strong> so we should not<br />

lodh for Rnv mf,nistic solution t{} the<br />

problem whlch foces u.(. Any effettive<br />

epproach to tJre proble$r \Nill have to be<br />

a hultifaceted one whldh touches upon<br />

Et lelst four prlnclFle ltems: the drlver,<br />

the roa.d. law enJorcement, end tlre cer.<br />

Together, the proposed Highwrry shd<br />

TtEfEc sBlety Acts of 1966 Frovide Just<br />

such Ls multlfBcrt€d EpproEch-<br />

The trsfic $afety bill, H.R. 13228,<br />

sthlch we are nos coroiderlng, fmu.ses<br />

primarily on Just one cr)mpolteltt OI the<br />

trefrc sfety problem-the motor vehlcle<br />

Itself. T'tris blll authorizes Lhe <strong>Sec</strong>retsr"y<br />

of Cornmerce to eslabllsh Federa.l mlnimum<br />

stsndard.$ for mo[or vehicle snd<br />

motor vehlcle eqEipment perfolmance.<br />

It elso authorizes the <strong>Sec</strong>retsry to conduct<br />

8"nd prromote motor vehlcle sfety<br />

research, developm€nt, <strong>and</strong> ttrting. F\rrther,<br />

tfie blll lncorporute$ tire sL&ndbrd<br />

provlsloro similar to tho'se oorrt8.ined ln<br />

the $rnat€-pas6ed Tire Safety Acl,, es<br />

well as in H.R. 14190, L blll I introduc€d<br />

nryself.<br />

H-R. f3228 is an excellent plece of<br />

leSlslatton hs lt Dow st<strong>and</strong>s. It signlflcantly<br />

strengtherls the Senate version of<br />

the trat0c sfety biu by coverins trucks<br />

arrd b$es currently regulEted by the lffttrstate<br />

Commerce Coftmission end by<br />

Buthorizing the establishmeht of FtsderEI<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards for uBed vehicleE wlthln 2<br />

yesrs after enacfuflent of the blu. I be-<br />

Iieve, however, that tt ls unnroesssrlly<br />

weaker tlrBn the genate blll in the erea<br />

of enforcement. It does not lnclude severel<br />

en-forcement <strong>and</strong> lnvestigEtory<br />

tlleasures Bppealing in the Scnate verslon,<br />

such as civil penaltleE for manufacturers<br />

fBiling to notify owners md<br />

dealers of salety defffts, <strong>and</strong> provisions<br />

for on-slt€ inspection of manufacturer's<br />

premises by the <strong>Sec</strong>retaly with penslties<br />

for any noncompliance discovered durlnF<br />

the fuTpections, I bclieve we $hould<br />

carefully coLsidef amendin8 H-R. 132?8<br />

to bring it into conformity wlth the senatc<br />

bill ln these matters.<br />

I would also like to recommend one<br />

further sddition, <strong>and</strong> thi$ i$ a provislon<br />

from snother of my b111s, H.R. f5060,<br />

whtch tt$eu contelns most of the baslc<br />

elehents of the reportrd traf0c safety<br />

btll. This provlslon wou]tl speciflcally<br />

Euthorize the S€cretary of commerce to<br />

cefry out & progrem to alevelop proto'<br />

type safe vehlcles. These specl$l prototype<br />

cars would embody ttle selety<br />

deslgn$ developed a$ a result of the re-<br />

Bearch udertatsen anrl promotcd bv the<br />

$ecretary. I belleve lt would be a great<br />

Vol.I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!