Journal of Computers - Academy Publisher
Journal of Computers - Academy Publisher
Journal of Computers - Academy Publisher
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS, VOL. 6, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2011 1829<br />
As can be seen from the above analysis, the main<br />
factors that influence China’s provincial manufacturing<br />
agglomeration include Market demand, Transportation,<br />
Industrial foundation, Supporting services and Financial<br />
income. Industrial foundation and Supporting services<br />
have positive impact on manufacturing agglomeration.<br />
Their elasticities are 1.3435 and 1.3270. While Financial<br />
income has a negative impact on manufacturing<br />
agglomeration with its elasticity -0.3536. Due to the fault<br />
<strong>of</strong> OLS method dealing with spatial autocorrelation, we<br />
intend to use spatial econometric models to analyze the<br />
influencing factors <strong>of</strong> manufacturing agglomeration. The<br />
new model is the one in estimation 2 <strong>of</strong> table 3:<br />
ln LQ = β0<br />
+ β1<br />
ln demand + β2<br />
ln road + β3<br />
ln<br />
+ β4<br />
ln service + β5<br />
ln fisc − income + ε<br />
We need to verify the existence <strong>of</strong> spatial<br />
autocorrelation before peforming spatial econometric<br />
analysis. The result <strong>of</strong> spatial dependence test is shown in<br />
table 4.<br />
Table 4: Spatial dependence test<br />
Spatial dependence MI/DF Statistics p value<br />
Moran’s I (Error) 0.1047 1.9679 0.0489<br />
LMLAG 1 0.2102 0.6465<br />
R-LMLAG 1 0.4540 0.5003<br />
LMERR 1 0.0931 0.7602<br />
R-LMERR 1 0.3370 0.5615<br />
LM-SARMA 2 0.5472 0.7606<br />
As is shown in table 4, LMERR, LMLAG, R-LMERR<br />
and R-LMLAG do not pass the test at significance level<br />
<strong>of</strong> 5%. And SEM is better comparing the value <strong>of</strong> LogL,<br />
industry AIC, SC and LR <strong>of</strong> SLM and SEM. The result <strong>of</strong><br />
estimation <strong>of</strong> SLM and SEM ( 8)<br />
is displayed in table 5.<br />
Table 5: SLM and SEM estimation <strong>of</strong> the factors <strong>of</strong> manufacturing agglomeration (2006-2008)<br />
SLM SEM<br />
Variables<br />
β<br />
Standard<br />
deviation<br />
t value p value β<br />
Standard<br />
deviation<br />
t value p value<br />
C 1.6128 0.5600 2.8797 0.0039 1.5984 0.5300 3.0154 0.0025<br />
lndemand 0.7757 0.1192 6.5054 0.0000 0.8018 0.0975 8.2223 0.0000<br />
lnroad 0.0742 0.0573 1.2952 0.1952 0.0851 0.0437 1.9457 0.0516<br />
lnindustry 1.3642 0.2306 5.9145 0.0000 1.3741 0.2224 6.1785 0.0000<br />
lnservice 1.3462 0.5464 2.4635 0.0137 1.3585 0.5442 2.4960 0.0125<br />
lnfisc-income 0.3370 0.2200 1.5319 0.1255 0.3516 0.2199 1.5985 0.1099<br />
ρ/λ 0.0621 0.1208 0.5146 0.6067 0.3324 0.1275 2.6064 0.0074<br />
Statistical test DF Statistics p value DF Statistics p value<br />
R 2 0.9296 0.9495<br />
LogL 4.8505 4.8034<br />
AIC 4.2989 2.3930<br />
SC 14.1073 10.8002<br />
LR 1 0.2285 0.6325 1 0.1344 0.7138<br />
As is shown in table 5, the coefficients <strong>of</strong> all variables<br />
are positive. It indicate that this estimation is more<br />
consistent with theoretical analysis. Industrial foundation<br />
and Supporting services have positive impact on<br />
manufacturing agglomeration. Their elasticities are<br />
1.3642 and 1.3462 in SLM, 1.3741 and 1.3585 in SEM.<br />
B. Prediction <strong>of</strong> Location Quotient <strong>of</strong> China’s Provincial<br />
Manufacturing<br />
BP neural network is error back propagation neural<br />
network and feedforward network. It is widely used in<br />
function approximation, pattern recognition and data<br />
compression. In this article, we will predict the 2009’s<br />
Location Quotient <strong>of</strong> China’s Provincial Manufacturing<br />
using Neural Network Toolbox in Matlab (2006, 2007<br />
and 2008’s location quotient are references for<br />
comparison). The Matlab program <strong>of</strong> prediction is as<br />
follows (take Beijing for example):<br />
clc<br />
close all<br />
clear all<br />
p0=[2.4289 2.1880 2.0585 1.6110 1.3667 1.4216<br />
1.4169 1.3470 1.2994 1.3316];<br />
day=1999:2008;<br />
plot(day, p0,'b+')<br />
© 2011 ACADEMY PUBLISHER<br />
hold on<br />
plot(day, p0, 'r-.')<br />
p1=(p0-min(p0))./(max(p0)-min(p0));<br />
for i=1:5;<br />
p(:,i)=p1(i:i+2);<br />
t(:,i)=p1(i+3);<br />
end<br />
p;<br />
t;<br />
for i=1:5;<br />
testp(:,i)=p1(i+1:i+3);<br />
testt(:,i)=p1(i+4);<br />
end<br />
net=newff(minmax(p),[20,1],{'logsig','purelin'},'trainl<br />
m');<br />
net.trainParam.lr=0.8;<br />
net.trainParam.epochs = 500;<br />
net.trainParam.goal = 0.001;<br />
net=train(net,p,t);<br />
y=sim(net,testp);<br />
E=testt-y;