15.01.2013 Views

MA4052 — Exercise Sheet 2: Final Homework Questions

MA4052 — Exercise Sheet 2: Final Homework Questions

MA4052 — Exercise Sheet 2: Final Homework Questions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12/12/12<br />

<strong>MA4052</strong> <strong>—</strong> <strong>Exercise</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong> 2: <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Homework</strong> <strong>Questions</strong><br />

1. Give an example of an operator T on a Hilbert space for which �T � �= r(T ), the<br />

spectral radius of T<br />

2. (a) Let H be a complex Hilbert space. Show that each T ∈ B(H) can be written<br />

as T = T1 + iT2 for a unique choice of self-adjoint operators Ti ∈ B(H).<br />

(b) Let T ∈ B(H). Show that T is normal if and only if T1 and T2 from (a)<br />

commute.<br />

(c) Let H = C 2 , with usual inner product, and define T ∈ B(H) by setting T x =<br />

(x1 + ix2, x1 − ix2). Find T ∗ , and show that T ∗ T = T T ∗ = 2I. Find T1 and T2<br />

from (a).<br />

3. Let H be a Hilbert space, and R, S, T ∈ B(H).<br />

(a) Show that for any α, β ∈ C with |α| = |β| we have that αR + βR ∗ is normal.<br />

(b) Let S and T be normal operators satisfying ST ∗ = T ∗ S. Show that S ∗ T = T S ∗ ,<br />

and that S + T and ST are normal.<br />

4. Let H be a Hilbert space. A linear functional φ ∈ B(H) ∗ is called positive if φ(T ) � 0<br />

whenever T ∈ B(H)+. A linear functional φ ∈ B(H) ∗ is called a state if it is positive<br />

and φ(I) = 1.<br />

(i) Show that S(H), the set of states, is a convex subset of B(H) ∗ , closed with<br />

respect to the usual norm on B(H) ∗ .<br />

(ii) Show that for each x ∈ H, the map ωx : B(H) → C given ωx(T ) = 〈x, T x〉<br />

defines a positive linear functional. For which x is ωx a state?<br />

5. Equip C n with its usual inner product structure: 〈z, w〉 = � n<br />

i=1 ziwi, and denote the<br />

resulting norm by �z� = � 〈z, z〉, leaving off the usual subscript. The operators in<br />

T ∈ B(C n ) are naturally identified with matrices in Mn(C) by T ←→ [T i j ], where T i j =<br />

〈ei, T ej〉 for the usual (orthonormal) basis {ei} n i=1 of C n . This question investigates<br />

three norms on B(C n ), one of which is the standard operator norm:<br />

�T �∞ := sup{�T x� : x ∈ C n , �x� � 1}.<br />

Here we add the subscript ∞ to distinguish this norm from the other two introduced<br />

below.<br />

(a) Recall that the trace on Mn(C) is define by<br />

tr(A) =<br />

n�<br />

A i i.<br />

Show that tr is a linear functional on Mn(C) and that tr(AB) = tr(BA) for all<br />

A, B ∈ Mn(C n ).<br />

(b) Show that the following defines an inner product on B(C n ):<br />

i=1<br />

〈S, T 〉 = tr(S ∗ T ),


where S and T are identified with their matrices with respect to the usual orthonormal<br />

basis of C n .<br />

Denote the resulting norm on B(C n ) as follows:<br />

(c) Define the following:<br />

�T �2 := � 〈T, T 〉.<br />

�T �1 := tr(|T |), T ∈ B(C n ),<br />

where |T | denotes the positive part of T . By carrying out the following steps, show<br />

that this defines a norm on B(C n ).<br />

(i) If S � 0, then S is self-adjoint, hence is diagonalisable. Show that �S�1 is<br />

the sum of the eigenvalues of S, and hence that �S�1 = 0 if and only if S = 0.<br />

Hence show that for a general T ∈ B(C n ), �T �1 � 0, with equality if and<br />

only if T = 0.<br />

(ii) Show that �λT �1 = |λ|�T �1 for all T ∈ B(C n ) and λ ∈ C.<br />

(iii) Show that for any R, T ∈ B(C n ) with T � 0 we have<br />

0 � R ∗ T R � �T �∞R ∗ R.<br />

(iv) Show that for all S, T ∈ B(C n ) we have<br />

| tr(ST )| � �S�∞�T �1.<br />

Hint: write ST = SU|T | 1/2 |T | 1/2 and use the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.<br />

(v) Show that for all S, T ∈ B(C n ) we have<br />

�S + T �1 � �S�1 + �T �1.<br />

Hint: write S + T = W |S + T | for some partial isometry W . Explain why<br />

W ∗ (S + T ) = |S + T |. Why must we have �W ∗ �∞ � 1?<br />

(d) For each T ∈ B(C n ) define a map ϕT : B(C n ) → C by<br />

ϕT (S) = tr(ST ).<br />

Show that ϕT is a linear functional on B(Cn ), and that if we consider ϕT as an<br />

element of � B(Cn �∗ ), � · �∞ then<br />

�ϕT � = �T �1.<br />

Hence show that the map T ↦→ ϕT gives a linear, isometric isomorphism between<br />

� � n<br />

B(C , � · �1 and<br />

� � n ∗.<br />

B(C ), � · �∞<br />

<strong>Final</strong>ly, show that ψ ∈ � B(C n ), � · �∞<br />

� ∗ is a state if and only if ψ = ϕT for some<br />

T ∈ B(C n ) such that T � 0 and tr(T ) = 1.


When H is an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space, � �∗ B(H), � · �∞ is isometrically<br />

isomorphic to the space of trace-class operators on H, which is an ideal in B(H)<br />

consisting of those operators for which a sensible definition of trace can be given.<br />

Note that in the finite-dimensional case, tr(I) = dim H, so for infinite-dimensional<br />

H the identity operator will not be trace-class. The positive trace-class operators of<br />

trace one (called density matrices) then correspond to states on B(H), which are of<br />

great interest in quantum mechanics. The states in part (ii) of question 4 are known<br />

as vector states, but there are many other mixed states. It can be shown, however,<br />

that S(H), the set of all states, is the smallest closed convex set that contains all the<br />

vector states, so the vector states in some sense generates S(H).<br />

For the commutative counterpart, if X = C0(R; C), the space of C-values, bounded,<br />

continuous functions on R that vanish at infinity ( lim<br />

x→±∞ g(x) = 0), and if f ∈ L1 (R; C)<br />

satisfies<br />

�<br />

f(x) � 0 for a.a. x ∈ R, f(x) dx = 1<br />

then the following defines a state on X:<br />

�<br />

ϕf(g) =<br />

R<br />

R<br />

g(x)f(x) dx,<br />

in the sense that if g � 0 then ϕf(g) � 0, and ϕf(1) = 1, where 1 is considered both<br />

as a number and as a constant function on R.<br />

The classification of all bounded linear functionals on X is the subject of another<br />

version of the Riesz Representation Theorem; the function f above is an example of<br />

a probability density function, but not all states on X arise this way. For example, if<br />

we pick any subset {x1, . . . , xn} ⊂ R and λ1, . . . , λn ∈ [0, ∞) with � n<br />

i=1 λi = 1, then<br />

ϕ(g) =<br />

n�<br />

λig(xi)<br />

i=1<br />

is also a state on X, but there is no f ∈ L1 (R) such that ϕ = ϕf.<br />

Noncommutative versions of classical mathematical theories (e.g. quantum probability,<br />

noncommutative geometry, quantum groups) take a classical theory, encode<br />

it as a commutative algebra, then throw away the commutativity. For probability<br />

theory, the basic set-up is a probability space (Ω, F, P), where Ω is the sample space,<br />

F a σ-algebra of subsets, and P a probability measure. The algebra L∞ (Ω) consists<br />

of random variables, and we have a state on L∞ (Ω) defined by<br />

�<br />

E[X] = X dP.<br />

A particular example involves defining a probability measure on R using probability<br />

density functions as above. But note that events, i.e. subsets A ∈ F, are associated<br />

to the random variable 1A, where<br />

1A(ω) =<br />

Ω<br />

�<br />

1 if ω ∈ A,<br />

0 if ω /∈ A.<br />

Note also f ∈ L ∞ (Ω) satisfies f 2 = f if and only if f = 1A for some A ∈ F,<br />

with P(A) = E[1A]. That is, events are projections in the algebra L ∞ (Ω), and the


probability of an event can be computed using the state. So probability theory is<br />

encoded by an algebra A with a state ω. If we drop commutativity, then we can, for<br />

example, consider (B(H), ωx) as a probability space, where elements of B(H) now<br />

are the random variables, with the (orthogonal) projections corresponding to events!<br />

But there are now plenty of questions to answer, for example given projections P and<br />

Q, how do we define the event that P and Q both occur?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!