15.01.2013 Views

i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org

i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org

i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

machines of moderate capacities, and to show the<br />

relation of these two types of compressor plants<br />

to each other as regards complete installation<br />

costs and operating expenses, the accompanying<br />

diagrams were prepared.<br />

As shown in plates I. and II. the free air capacity<br />

of the two types of compressors is compared<br />

with installation costs and operating expenses for<br />

sizes from 1,500 to 11,000 cubic feet per minute.<br />

The installation costs are close approximations to<br />

actual costs and would meet general conditions<br />

under which such plants are installed in different<br />

parts of the country. The difference in first cost<br />

THE <strong>COAL</strong> TRADE BULLETIN. 31<br />

made up in two years. At 5,01)0 cubic feet capacity<br />

the difference is made up in one year with<br />

coal at 75 cents per ton. Beyond this point there<br />

is absolutely no question about the economy of the<br />

Corliss type of compressor for the difference in<br />

installation costs is a decreasing one and at 9.500<br />

cubic feet capacity the installation cost of the<br />

Corliss plant is less than that of the straight-line<br />

compressor plant.<br />

The straight-line plants tabulated here have<br />

been favored in many respects for both types of<br />

plants are considered as placed under one roof,<br />

whereas the average straight-line plant of four to<br />

TDtrrcnENcrs IN IHSTRLL/'TION COSTS RNJI ANNUML OPSHHTING £xpf«jfi Or SmnitiHT LINE HN-Q<br />

Cnoss CoMPOuNii COFILISS Rm T^LHNTZ.<br />

TC.WOlBTfl. ^NSSw.LTa<br />

PLRTE M.<br />

fyy.nfrlletl B,<br />

renter ,,...<br />

Cutlet X • ~0,J/.ree.c. ,. tn.tallat,.* Cat* oj Jttaijtlt Lit,. ••>« Carina Cre.s C.mF..r.et riant.. CC»r..,» Ct in o»li u^ To ?£J0 c.ft Caj.ae,Ty)<br />

Diff.r.ne. In Opeeattna Erp.n.ta. Coal at JS f*' rem. Curve H * bee, hea Cot... £. ' ioao hr,<br />

- ' Coal, .t loo per In, ' 2%' oooo ' I — iooa -<br />

- • C.al at ta. per Tor,. ' C'booo ' G '3ooo •<br />

' * - • C.al at o.. y' Ton " £J-t,aoo • ' H'Cooo •<br />

DTrcRCLNCCS IN /NSTftLLrlTION COSTS ~ Utrrti Fy C NCCS llN RlVN OPZFttirtNC £>\PCNSt2 6<br />

and operating expenses between the two types is<br />

shown in plate III.<br />

The operating expenses are based on 6,000 hours<br />

work per year and the price of coal is taken at<br />

75 cents, $1.00, $2.00 and $3.00 per ton. The last<br />

two costs are intended for mines other than coal<br />

mines. The conditions assumed in these calculations<br />

are such as obtain in general practice and<br />

are as shown in table on the preceding page.<br />

From a study of the results it is apparent that<br />

the Corliss compressor has a legitimate field in<br />

the coal mine, for even wth capacities as low as<br />

2,500 cubic feet, the difference in installation is<br />

six machines has at least three to four buildings<br />

and separate engineers and firemen.<br />

Aside from its economic advantages, the Corliss<br />

compressor possesses mechanical advantages over<br />

the other type that recommend it. It has a<br />

higher mechanical efficiency, or less friction, its<br />

volumetric efficiency is higher, the inlet air is<br />

cooler, the lubrication is better, the maximum<br />

strains are lower and resistance is more uniform<br />

and its life is longer. The regulation is automatic<br />

and is effected through the governor on the<br />

cut-off mechanism of the valve gear.<br />

It is generally possible to place the power plant

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!