15.01.2013 Views

i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org

i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org

i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2i5 THE <strong>COAL</strong> TRADE BULLETIN.<br />

tricity, and 2,339 by compressed air. The total<br />

cut or mined by machines was 38,551.076 tons, or<br />

37.2 per cent, of the total output.<br />

In haulage in the bituminous mines, there were<br />

used 162 steam locomotives, 23 compressed air<br />

locomotives, and 435 electric motors; a total of<br />

620 mechanical motors. There were also 12,899<br />

horses and mules reported at work.<br />

The total number of boilers in use at the mines<br />

was 2,460. rated at 259,211 h. p. The number of<br />

steam engines was 1.954, rated at a total of 195.149<br />

h. p. There were 391 dynamos at work at the<br />

mines where electric power is used; while 446<br />

air compressors were employed. In handling<br />

water 1,075 power pumps were used. The total<br />

rated capacity of these pumps was 685,208 gallons<br />

per minute; the actual work performed was 270,-<br />

194 gallons per minute raised, thus showing 39.4<br />

per cent, of the rated capacity actually required to<br />

free the mines from water.<br />

The explosives used during the year were 1,136,-<br />

305 pounds of dynamite and 445,829 kegs of powder.<br />

This would give an average of 233 tons of<br />

coal broken per keg of powder used.<br />

During the year 402 lives were lost in and about<br />

the mines and 1,046 employes were injured.<br />

The variation in the quantity of coal mined per<br />

employe is largely due to the fact that in slack<br />

years the tendency is to diminish the number of<br />

working days, rather than to cut down the torce<br />

employed.<br />

MARINE FUEL REPORT.<br />

In order to ascertain the amount of coal which<br />

is annually required for the fueling of vessels at<br />

the different ports in the United States, the collectors<br />

of customs have been making monthly reports<br />

of the quantity loaded on steamers for fuel consumption<br />

during the year 1903, distinguishing<br />

wherever practicable between the quantity taken<br />

by coast-wise vessels and that by vessels engaged<br />

in the foreign trade regardless of nationality in<br />

the latter class. The results are given in the<br />

table following, as published in the Summary of<br />

Commerce and Finance. The average price per<br />

ton is the price reported by dealers in the customs<br />

district or at the port where the coal has been delivered<br />

to steamers for consumption and is to be<br />

taken as representing the market value under<br />

these conditions:<br />

Net tons. Price per ton.<br />

Atlantic ports 4,662,067 $3.75<br />

Gulf ports 574,094 3.82<br />

Pacific ports 578,753 4.73<br />

Great Lakes 2,382,081 3.11<br />

Total 8,196,995 $3.64<br />

THE HISTORY, PRODUCTION AND GENERAL<br />

STATISTICS OF THE KANAWHA AND<br />

NEW RIVER <strong>COAL</strong> FIELDS OF WEST<br />

VIRGINIA.<br />

A large amount of useful and interesting information,<br />

condensed into a small space, is contained<br />

in the neat brochure compiled by Neil<br />

Robinson of Charleston, W. Va.. on the Kanawha<br />

and New River coal fields of West Virginia. Separate<br />

maps of both districts are given and the area<br />

treated embraces 840 square miles. Within this<br />

area, it is asserted, a greater variety of coals is<br />

found and a greater number of coal seams is<br />

being mined than have ever been found elsewhere<br />

in the world in a territory of similar size. These<br />

coals are declared to be uniformly low in ash and<br />

sulphur, and to cover every known requirement on<br />

the part of the consumers, whether it may be for<br />

domestic use, blacksmithing, coke ovens, by-product<br />

plants, gas making or the generation of<br />

steam.<br />

Eleven seams have been opened on a commercial<br />

scale, of which eight are in the Kanawha and<br />

three in the New River series. They are considered<br />

in the order in which they have their<br />

bedding, geologically, commencing with the youngest<br />

and highest seam in the formations. They are<br />

known as the No. 5 Block, Belmont, Coalburgh,<br />

Winifrede, Cedar Grove, No. 2, or Gas. Powellton,<br />

No. 1, or Eagle, Sewell, Beckley and Fire Creek<br />

seams. Regarding their qualities and the extent<br />

and history of their operation Mr. Robinson says<br />

in part:<br />

The No. 5 Block coal is found on the crests of<br />

the hills near the Big Kanawha river. It has<br />

a thickness of over seven feet. It is bright in<br />

appearance, stands handling and transportation,<br />

mines out in large blocks, and is shipped almost<br />

exclusively for high grade domestic trade. The<br />

loading capacity of the field is 775 tons a day,<br />

from five mines. ,<br />

The Belmont coal outcrops from 100 to 120 feet<br />

lower in the hills than the No. 5 Block. It has<br />

been mined in the Kanawha valley for more than<br />

25 years, and ranks as one of the standard domestic<br />

coals. The coal is free-burning, leaves very<br />

little ash, and stands transportation remarkably<br />

well. Quite a large trade has been developed<br />

throughout the Northwest and West, and regular<br />

shipments are made each year to points beyond<br />

Omaha. Only coal of the finest quality could<br />

stand the freightage for so great a distance. The<br />

thickness of the seam is from 4 to 6 feet and the<br />

actual daily loading capacity of the four mines is<br />

2,075 tons.<br />

About the year 1853 the existence of the Coalburgh<br />

seam became generally known, and mines<br />

were opened at the village from which the seam<br />

takes its name for the purpose of loading barges

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!