15.01.2013 Views

i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org

i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org

i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

50 THE <strong>COAL</strong> TRADE BULLETIN.<br />

REPORT OF <strong>COAL</strong> TESTS MADE<br />

AT THE ST. LOUIS EXPOSITION.<br />

The fact that coals and other mineral fuels<br />

used in the United States during 1904 cost the con­<br />

sumers approximately $1,500,000,000 indicates the<br />

magnitude and importance of the problems which<br />

the United States Geological Survey had under<br />

investigation in connection with its coal-testing<br />

plant at the Louisiana Purchase Exposition. It<br />

will interest many people to know that a preliminary<br />

report on the operations of that plant has re­<br />

cently been published. It is the work of E. W.<br />

Parker, .1. A. Holmes, and M. R. Campbell, who<br />

were appointed by the Directors of the United<br />

States Geological Survey as a committee to install<br />

a coal-testing plant on the World's Fair Grounds<br />

at St. Louis, and to conduct therein a series of<br />

tests on the best methods of utilizing coal and<br />

lignite. The report contains a brief statement<br />

of the results obtained from September 1, 1904,<br />

when the plant was put in operation, to December<br />

24. 1904. A more detailed report, which will be<br />

fully illustrated by photographs and graphic charts,<br />

and which will describe the methods employed in<br />

making the coal tests and discuss the results ob­<br />

tained, is in preparation and will be published.<br />

The total sum appropriated for this work was<br />

$60,000. Under the law authorizing the work all<br />

of the testing machinery and all of the coals to be<br />

tested had to be furnished to the government free<br />

of charge. These conditions made it impossible<br />

to provide an ideal testing plant in the time allot­<br />

ted for the work, and there was considerable delay<br />

in assembling the equipment. The conimittee<br />

feels, nevertheless, that through the hearty and<br />

patriotic co-operation of a large number of manufacturers<br />

of apparatus and machinery, it was able<br />

to collect and install, within a notably short time,<br />

a testing plant that was well suited for such<br />

pioneer work. The buildings erected for the work<br />

consisted of a boiler and engine house, a storage<br />

and washery building, and two buildings for bri­<br />

quetting machines and equipment. A part of the<br />

metal pavilion was utilized for a chemical laboratory,<br />

in which all of the chemical work connected<br />

with the tests was performed.<br />

The various portions of the plant were put under<br />

the direction of men thoroughly equipped in their<br />

special lines. The steam-test division was under<br />

the direction of Prof. L. P. Breckenridge. of the<br />

University of Illinois. The producer gas tests<br />

were under the direction of Prof. Robert H. Fer­<br />

nald, of Washington University, St. Louis. The<br />

washing operations were under the superintendence<br />

of John D. Wick, of Chicago, general fore­<br />

man of the plant. The coking plant was in charge<br />

of Fred. \V. Stammler, of Johnstown. Pa. The<br />

briquetting tests were directed by Dr. Joseph Hyde<br />

Pratt, of the University of North Carolina and<br />

the North Carolina Geological Survey. The plans<br />

for the chemical laboratory, its equipment and<br />

operations, were made under the direction of Prof.<br />

N. W. Lord, of the Ohio State University.<br />

The field work was placed in charge of Mr. M. R.<br />

Campbell, one of the committee appointed by the<br />

director of the survey for the prosecution of these<br />

tests. All of the coal shipped to the plant for<br />

testing, with the exception of a few carloads was<br />

collected under the supervision of a survey official.<br />

This was done to avoid any possibility of the criti­<br />

cism that selected coals had been subjected to<br />

these tests.<br />

Among the results already clearly indicated by<br />

these preliminary tests the following may be<br />

stated as worthy of special consideration: (1) The<br />

tests in the steam-boiler plant of 65 carload sam­<br />

ples of coal from 17 states indicate that the steamproducing<br />

capacity of American coals is high and<br />

that the quality of many of these coals may be<br />

improved by washing. (2) The producer-gas tests<br />

show the most striking results, and they indicate<br />

a revolution in the economical use of coal for the<br />

production of power. The results clearly demon­<br />

strate the following points: (a) that most of the<br />

American bituminous coals and lignites can be<br />

used successfully in the manufacture of producer<br />

gas. and that this gas can be utilized in an explo­<br />

sive gas engine; (b) that this method of using<br />

fuel is much more economical than the present<br />

mode of generating steam. (31 Some of the lignites<br />

from partially developed but extensive deposits in<br />

North Dakota and Texas, when tested in the gas<br />

producer and gas engine, have shown unexpectedly<br />

high power-producing qualities, such as promise<br />

large future developments in those and other<br />

states. (4) Some of the American coals, and the<br />

"slack" produced in mining these coals, can he<br />

briquetted on a commercial basis.<br />

This report is listed as Bulletin No. 261 among<br />

the survey's publications. It is intended for general<br />

distribution and may be obtained on applica­<br />

tion to the director of the United States geological<br />

survey. Washington, D. C.<br />

The United States census report on coal produc­<br />

tion shows that while in 1830 the production of<br />

coal per unit of population was hut one-fortieth<br />

of a ton, it is at the present time on a basis of<br />

four tons per capita, a hundredfold increase, or<br />

10,000 per cent. In 1840 the per capita tonnage<br />

was .105; 1850, .278: 1860, .514: and not until<br />

1870 did it approach one ton per capita, the exact<br />

figures then being .955. Since then rapid strides<br />

have been made. For 1880 the tonnage was 1.518;<br />

1890, 2.255; 1900, 3.534; 1902, 3.838; and at present,<br />

it is safe to say, at least four tons per capita.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!