i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org
i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org
i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
34 THE <strong>COAL</strong> TRADE BULLETIN.<br />
TEMPERATURE AND MINE EXPLOSIONS.<br />
Regarding the influence of weather on mine ex<br />
plosions the report of the commission appointed<br />
to examine into mine explosions in Kansas says,<br />
in part:<br />
"It is noticeable tnat all the explosions since<br />
1903 have occurred in the months of January,<br />
February and April. The one on the latter month<br />
happening in the only wet mine under discussion.<br />
Five of the major explosions and three minor explosions<br />
occurred between January 18. 1905, and<br />
February 9, 1905, during one of the coldest periods<br />
in the history of this coal field. It is the belief<br />
of tne commission that cold weather may affect<br />
the dust in two ways: first, by lowering the temperature<br />
to such an extent that the very fine particles<br />
of dust which, during warmer weather would<br />
be readily oxidized and destroyed, remain unclestroyed<br />
and accumulate. This will then be in<br />
condition to be readily ignited when a shot throws<br />
fire; second, in the summer the warm air is more<br />
moist than the air in the cooler parts of the mine<br />
and gives up its moisture to the cooler parts of<br />
the mine; while in the winter the cold, dry air<br />
from outside contains less moisture than the<br />
warmer air of the mine and absorbs the moisture<br />
from the mine, leaving it dry and tending to increase<br />
the amount of dust. As an illustration of<br />
the variation in temperature we learned that at<br />
the time of the explosion in the Devlin and Miller<br />
mine No. 1, on February 9, the temperature was<br />
as low as zero at the head of the main West entry.<br />
and was even lower in the air passages before<br />
reaching the head of the entry."<br />
On the source of dust the report says:<br />
"The source of dust may be the dust which collects<br />
in the handling of the coal, in the breaking<br />
down of the coal by excessive shots, from the<br />
dust made by the drill, and by the blowing out<br />
of shots tamped with drillings. We have suggested<br />
the elimination, as far as possible, of these<br />
various kinds of dust."<br />
The following recommendations were made by<br />
the commission:<br />
First. That operators of dry mines should<br />
keep them thoroughly wet.<br />
Second. That great care should be used in the<br />
placing of shots.<br />
Third. That no combustible matter be allowed<br />
in the tamping of shots.<br />
Fourth. That squibs should be used instead of<br />
fuse in firing shots.<br />
Fifth. That in the future the fan should be at<br />
least 15 feet from the mouth of the shaft.<br />
Prospectors at Ramsey, 111., found an S'^-foot<br />
vein of coal at a depth of 674 feet.<br />
PRESIDENT BAER'S VIEWS<br />
OF <strong>COAL</strong> TRADE PROBLEMS.<br />
President Ge<strong>org</strong>e F. Baer, of the Philadelphia &<br />
Reading Coal & Iron Co.. delivered at Pottsville.<br />
on April 8, the last of the series of lectures on<br />
practical mining topics provided during the winter<br />
for the employes of the Reading conipany. Mr.<br />
Baer took for his subject "Some Problems of the<br />
Coal Industry." He said in part:<br />
The public wants cheap fuel; the miners and<br />
workers want high wages, the owners want a reasonable<br />
profit on their investment. This simple<br />
statement at once discloses an irrepressible conflict.<br />
I regret to say that the coal company manager's<br />
lot is not a happy one. It is not materially<br />
improved by giving him the barren title of<br />
"Coal Baron."<br />
..The public has a high appreciation either of our<br />
incompetency or of the difficulties besetting us,<br />
because it is forever advising us how to manage<br />
our business. They are our friends, who, to<br />
meet public expectation, are compelled to be at all<br />
times oracles of wisdom as to the many things<br />
they know nothing about. They are expected to<br />
know all about mining and selling coal, and to be<br />
always amazed at the stupidity of our management.<br />
Then, there is the disinterested altruistic "walking<br />
delegate," who, though "he toils not. neither<br />
does he spin," is delighted to exercise a benevolent<br />
supervision over both capital and labor. We<br />
receive little praise but much censure from the<br />
big and little statesmen and politicians, who give<br />
no employment and pay no wages, but exchange<br />
sympathetic talk and promises for votes. There<br />
is still another class of men willing to aid us,<br />
the emotional reformers and idealists, each one<br />
of whom believes himself competent to make a<br />
better world than He who in the beginning created<br />
it and pronounced it good.<br />
If we could eliminate all these we could probably<br />
find a remnant of people of good common<br />
sense to judge our acts with righteous judgment.<br />
Because coal is a necessity of our modern life<br />
the owners of coal are under some kind of obligation<br />
to do all within their power to supply coal<br />
to the public in reasonable quantities and at a<br />
fair price. The suggestion that coal being a<br />
natural product in some mysterious way this<br />
public obligation is higher than the duty involved<br />
in the supply of any other necessity of life,<br />
food, for example, is utterly untenable.<br />
Some one will say that these natural products,<br />
like oil and coal, should belong to the state. Has<br />
it ever occurred to you that if the state owned the<br />
coal mines the work incident to mining the coal<br />
and marketing it would still have to be done in<br />
exactly the same way as we are doing it and at<br />
a greater cost. How much more per ton would