15.01.2013 Views

i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org

i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org

i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

34 THE <strong>COAL</strong> TRADE BULLETIN.<br />

nage, but those obligations are all done, those contracts<br />

have expired, have been completed. We<br />

start in this year to compete with a clean slate.<br />

comparatively speaking, with the other regions,<br />

and if we are going to get business we must get<br />

it on the basis of competition or else let it alone.<br />

If we don't get much and can't compete, the idleness<br />

that Central Pennsylvania saw last year will<br />

hardly be a circumstance to what it will see this<br />

year. That is what you want to think about.<br />

Naturally we, as operators, want to do business;<br />

we want to run the plants in which our money<br />

is invested, and we want to show a reasonable<br />

return. You men want all the wage you can get.<br />

That is right, right from your standpoint and it<br />

is right from ours, but you can't sell two dollars<br />

worth of labor for two dollars and a half. You<br />

may do it for a little while, you may pinch the<br />

operator until he goes and gets the money or<br />

takes what he has saved up to pay it to you, but,<br />

as your own leader will tell you, that is not good<br />

business; that can't continue; that has been going<br />

on and you are faced with the problem now of<br />

either getting down and meeting this or sitting<br />

still in idleness or getting work somewhere else.<br />

We had an instance last summer, we shut up a<br />

colliery. Your own men thought it was all a bluff.<br />

We talked to them. We reasoned with them. We<br />

OPENED THE BOOKS<br />

and showed it to them the coal cost us from 25<br />

to 50 cents a ton more than we were getting. We<br />

shut it up. We said, men, we don't know when<br />

we will start again, maybe in six months, maybe<br />

never, we don't know; we want to show you the<br />

whole story, it can't go on. In the end you saw it,<br />

after you had made a great deal of trouble, and<br />

your own men did just what you condemn, came<br />

to us and asked us to put three men in two men's<br />

places, and we reasoned with them and showed<br />

them that couldn't be done and after considerable<br />

trouble they were convinced. We showed them<br />

everything there was about it. We want to show<br />

you all the cards right on the table. It is either<br />

work in competition or it is quit. Now let us<br />

look at it in a reasonable cold business-like way.<br />

Don't mind these stories that come out in the<br />

newspapers. Takeew word for some of it. We<br />

are not here to deceive you. It is to our interest<br />

to run, as I just told you, but it isn't to our interest<br />

to run at a loss. We run at a loss to hold<br />

business, up to a certain point, and then we have<br />

got to quit. I don't say every operator lost—<br />

don't misunderstand. We talk for the region as<br />

a whole and that is what you are faced with.<br />

Now, think of it carefully and remember we are<br />

telling you the exact condition of affairs. We don't<br />

want to put up the South as any bugaboo. We<br />

don't want to say to you somebody is doing this<br />

and that, and therefore you have got to work for<br />

nothing. We don't want to do that. It isn't<br />

necessary, but it is necessary to come<br />

WITHIN REACH OF COMPETITION.<br />

The debate in the joint committee was resumed<br />

on March 17, a considerable portion of the day<br />

being devoted to a discussion of reports showing<br />

the cost of production in various competitive<br />

fields during the past six months. The data<br />

gathered came from 234 mines, and showed the<br />

extreme figures at which these coals were sold in<br />

the Eastern and line markets. No progress<br />

was apparently made at the three joint scale committee<br />

sessions, the miners' representatives being<br />

willing only to concede one point to maintain the<br />

old scale of wages at 62 cents, providing the operators<br />

would accept clauses 6, 7, S, 9, 10 and 11 of<br />

the new scale agreement, but this was emphatically<br />

refused, being reported back to the convention<br />

and a joint session of all operators and delegates<br />

was asked for.<br />

James Kerr and Frank H. Wigton presented the<br />

operators' side of the facts to the convention<br />

held in the evening, in a full and lucid manner.<br />

contending that their<br />

POSITION WAS UNBEARABLE<br />

with the actual total cost of 95 cents per ton<br />

for coal on the cars, as against 60 and 70 cents in<br />

other fields. The miners were promised reasonably<br />

fair work, covering over $2.50 per day if<br />

they agreed to accept a reduction in wages and<br />

were urged by the operators not to insist on a<br />

rate of wages that would be liable to lay the<br />

mines idle as was the case last year. Mr. Kerr<br />

said:<br />

"Mr. Chairman: The scale committee beg leave<br />

to report that they have been discussing since<br />

they met here yesterday the different scales presented<br />

by the miners and operators. The discussion<br />

has brought no conclusion. The scale<br />

committee seem unable to agree. We thought<br />

that possibly it was better for us to come back<br />

to the joint convention and report to you our<br />

difficulties, giving you some of the reasons therefor,<br />

so that you might understand more fully the<br />

difficulties we have to contend with in reaching<br />

an agreement, and once your knowledge of those<br />

difficulties was increased somewhat by the information<br />

we had on this subject, that our future<br />

deliberations as a scale conimittee might be conducted<br />

with knowledge of the fact that you were<br />

at least in possession of some of the information<br />

that we had on this subject. Some comment was<br />

made in the joint convention that the operators<br />

failed to give a reason for the scale they asked<br />

the convention to adopt. There are many reasons<br />

why operators might hesitate to get up before<br />

the general public and discuss these trade<br />

questions. Many of them are in a sense secret<br />

to us and are not for the information of the gen-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!