15.01.2013 Views

i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org

i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org

i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I come now to the second test which I conceive<br />

should be applied to all employers' policies, namely<br />

this: do they tend to promote good-will between<br />

employers and employed? After all, the great<br />

thing to be done to make the industries of any<br />

people effective is to secure the good-will of the<br />

men and women that labor in those industries.<br />

What is the reason that slavery as an industrial<br />

method is<br />

NOTORIOUSLY UNPRODUCTIVE<br />

and costly? There is no good-will in it. What<br />

is the reason that any man who feels that he is<br />

working for the direct benefit of his family and<br />

himself will work a deal harder than a man who<br />

has no such belief? It is all a question of goodwill.<br />

If all the work-people in our country, <strong>org</strong>anized<br />

or un<strong>org</strong>anized, felt to-day that they were<br />

working for their own uplifting and then their<br />

own happiness, they would work with such a will<br />

that the productiveness and general efficiency of<br />

labor would mount to an inconceivable height.<br />

The ultimate question about the industrial situation<br />

is, therefore, how to promote good-will in<br />

labor. We must all desire that every individual<br />

employer should constantly bear in mind this test<br />

of his own policy, and of his association's policy—<br />

does it tend toward good-will between the employer<br />

and the employed? How can this tendency<br />

be secured? Only by thoughtfulness, consideration<br />

and sympathy, and by constant care for<br />

right relations between the employer and employed.<br />

How can such right feelings be expressed?<br />

Not by any form of benevolence or condescension,<br />

and not by the giving of favors, but<br />

by the recognition of rights and the giving of<br />

earned privileges. Of course we all believe that<br />

the arrangements called "welfare" arrangements<br />

tend in the direction I am now advocating; but<br />

welfare arrangements should never be presented<br />

as if they were a benevolence. They are really<br />

means of promoting efficiency and productiveness,<br />

and of securing the natural good-will and the<br />

natural co-operative effort between employer and<br />

employed. All health arrangements come under<br />

this head. The great depressing influences that<br />

DIMINISH NATIONAL PRODUCTIVENESS<br />

are low bodily condition, sickness and premature<br />

death, all of which result from failure to take<br />

care of the bodily vigor and the animal spirits of<br />

the workmen.<br />

All contrivances which make the workman feel<br />

that he has a personal share in the success of the<br />

shop or factory in which he labors tend strongly<br />

to the promotion of good-will. We need, however,<br />

many more inventions of this sort. We<br />

already have the method of piece work, of contract<br />

work by groups of workmen, the premium<br />

method, the method of commission on sales, the<br />

rising wage with length of service, and the sharing<br />

THE <strong>COAL</strong> TRADE BULLETIN. 33<br />

of profits with the employes. All these are experimental.<br />

There is a difficulty with all of<br />

them—namely, that a method which works well<br />

when the establishment is profitable may work ill<br />

or not at all, when the same establishment is unprofitable.<br />

New inventions and new experiments<br />

are needed in this direction, new means of promoting<br />

the sense of common interest between the<br />

employer and employed. The problem of establishing<br />

good will between the employer and the<br />

employed will, however, take us much farther<br />

than welfare arrangements and profit-sharing.<br />

The employer will have to interest himself not<br />

only in the efficient productiveness of his workmen<br />

while they are at work, but in their social<br />

surroundings and their opportunities for rational<br />

pleasure. There is no separating attention to the<br />

general physical and mental well-being of large<br />

groups of working people from the industrial<br />

problem of establishing good-will. Municipal well<br />

being must be made a part of industrial well<br />

being; and<br />

THE THOUGHTFUL EMPLOYER<br />

will interest himself in the condition of the town<br />

or city where his works are established, and in<br />

the opportunities for enjoyment it affords, just<br />

as he will interest himself in the tidiness and<br />

wholesomeness of his factory, and in the appearance<br />

of the grounds about his works. A dirty,<br />

squalid, ugly town, without parks, playground,<br />

libraries, cheerful schools, gardens, lectures and<br />

concerts, and overhung night and day by a pall<br />

of smoke, can never be the permanent seat of a<br />

prominent industry where reign health and goodwill.<br />

Among sound employers' policies may always be<br />

included their policy in regard to the discipline<br />

of the works or shops, for the reason that this<br />

policy has a great deal to do with the establishment<br />

and maintenance of good-will. It is a reasonable<br />

expectation on the part of workingmen,<br />

who feel that they are in partnership with the<br />

owner, that they should have a right to confer<br />

with him about the rules of the works. It is a<br />

reasonable expectation that complaints should be<br />

promptly attended to and investigated by the<br />

right person— not by the person who is complained<br />

of, or by any impartial and arbitrary<br />

person. It is amazing how rough and thoughtless<br />

many employers have been in this respect.<br />

An employer of many thousands of men in a crude<br />

industry which demands vigor and a certain daring<br />

in the individual workman once told me that<br />

he attributed his exemption for thirty years from<br />

serious labor difficulties to a careful method of<br />

DEALING JUSTLY WITH COMPLAINTS.<br />

The employer's ignorance about just sources<br />

of complaint, or his failure to provide a just<br />

method of dealing with complaints, is the com-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!