i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org
i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org
i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
I come now to the second test which I conceive<br />
should be applied to all employers' policies, namely<br />
this: do they tend to promote good-will between<br />
employers and employed? After all, the great<br />
thing to be done to make the industries of any<br />
people effective is to secure the good-will of the<br />
men and women that labor in those industries.<br />
What is the reason that slavery as an industrial<br />
method is<br />
NOTORIOUSLY UNPRODUCTIVE<br />
and costly? There is no good-will in it. What<br />
is the reason that any man who feels that he is<br />
working for the direct benefit of his family and<br />
himself will work a deal harder than a man who<br />
has no such belief? It is all a question of goodwill.<br />
If all the work-people in our country, <strong>org</strong>anized<br />
or un<strong>org</strong>anized, felt to-day that they were<br />
working for their own uplifting and then their<br />
own happiness, they would work with such a will<br />
that the productiveness and general efficiency of<br />
labor would mount to an inconceivable height.<br />
The ultimate question about the industrial situation<br />
is, therefore, how to promote good-will in<br />
labor. We must all desire that every individual<br />
employer should constantly bear in mind this test<br />
of his own policy, and of his association's policy—<br />
does it tend toward good-will between the employer<br />
and the employed? How can this tendency<br />
be secured? Only by thoughtfulness, consideration<br />
and sympathy, and by constant care for<br />
right relations between the employer and employed.<br />
How can such right feelings be expressed?<br />
Not by any form of benevolence or condescension,<br />
and not by the giving of favors, but<br />
by the recognition of rights and the giving of<br />
earned privileges. Of course we all believe that<br />
the arrangements called "welfare" arrangements<br />
tend in the direction I am now advocating; but<br />
welfare arrangements should never be presented<br />
as if they were a benevolence. They are really<br />
means of promoting efficiency and productiveness,<br />
and of securing the natural good-will and the<br />
natural co-operative effort between employer and<br />
employed. All health arrangements come under<br />
this head. The great depressing influences that<br />
DIMINISH NATIONAL PRODUCTIVENESS<br />
are low bodily condition, sickness and premature<br />
death, all of which result from failure to take<br />
care of the bodily vigor and the animal spirits of<br />
the workmen.<br />
All contrivances which make the workman feel<br />
that he has a personal share in the success of the<br />
shop or factory in which he labors tend strongly<br />
to the promotion of good-will. We need, however,<br />
many more inventions of this sort. We<br />
already have the method of piece work, of contract<br />
work by groups of workmen, the premium<br />
method, the method of commission on sales, the<br />
rising wage with length of service, and the sharing<br />
THE <strong>COAL</strong> TRADE BULLETIN. 33<br />
of profits with the employes. All these are experimental.<br />
There is a difficulty with all of<br />
them—namely, that a method which works well<br />
when the establishment is profitable may work ill<br />
or not at all, when the same establishment is unprofitable.<br />
New inventions and new experiments<br />
are needed in this direction, new means of promoting<br />
the sense of common interest between the<br />
employer and employed. The problem of establishing<br />
good will between the employer and the<br />
employed will, however, take us much farther<br />
than welfare arrangements and profit-sharing.<br />
The employer will have to interest himself not<br />
only in the efficient productiveness of his workmen<br />
while they are at work, but in their social<br />
surroundings and their opportunities for rational<br />
pleasure. There is no separating attention to the<br />
general physical and mental well-being of large<br />
groups of working people from the industrial<br />
problem of establishing good-will. Municipal well<br />
being must be made a part of industrial well<br />
being; and<br />
THE THOUGHTFUL EMPLOYER<br />
will interest himself in the condition of the town<br />
or city where his works are established, and in<br />
the opportunities for enjoyment it affords, just<br />
as he will interest himself in the tidiness and<br />
wholesomeness of his factory, and in the appearance<br />
of the grounds about his works. A dirty,<br />
squalid, ugly town, without parks, playground,<br />
libraries, cheerful schools, gardens, lectures and<br />
concerts, and overhung night and day by a pall<br />
of smoke, can never be the permanent seat of a<br />
prominent industry where reign health and goodwill.<br />
Among sound employers' policies may always be<br />
included their policy in regard to the discipline<br />
of the works or shops, for the reason that this<br />
policy has a great deal to do with the establishment<br />
and maintenance of good-will. It is a reasonable<br />
expectation on the part of workingmen,<br />
who feel that they are in partnership with the<br />
owner, that they should have a right to confer<br />
with him about the rules of the works. It is a<br />
reasonable expectation that complaints should be<br />
promptly attended to and investigated by the<br />
right person— not by the person who is complained<br />
of, or by any impartial and arbitrary<br />
person. It is amazing how rough and thoughtless<br />
many employers have been in this respect.<br />
An employer of many thousands of men in a crude<br />
industry which demands vigor and a certain daring<br />
in the individual workman once told me that<br />
he attributed his exemption for thirty years from<br />
serious labor difficulties to a careful method of<br />
DEALING JUSTLY WITH COMPLAINTS.<br />
The employer's ignorance about just sources<br />
of complaint, or his failure to provide a just<br />
method of dealing with complaints, is the com-