15.01.2013 Views

i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org

i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org

i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26 THE <strong>COAL</strong> TRADE BULLETIN.<br />

output last year of 1,480,000 tons. The combined<br />

output of the mines of the Pittsburgh Coal Co.<br />

and its subsidiary companies, including the Monongahela<br />

River Consolidated Coal & Coke Co., is<br />

upwards of 20,000,000 tons of bituminous coal per<br />

annum, which is about 26 per cent, of the total<br />

bituminous output of the state of Pennsylvania,<br />

greater by 3,000,000 tons than the bituminous output<br />

of Ohio, equal to the output of West Virginia,<br />

about 85 per cent, of the output of Illinois, and<br />

about one-ninth of the total bituminous output of<br />

the United States. In addition to this its docks<br />

on the Great Lakes handle about a million tons of<br />

anthracite and a half million tons of bituminous<br />

coals from other fields. The total number of employes<br />

paid over the rolls of the Pittsburgh Coal<br />

Co. and its subsidiary companies averages about<br />

46,000.<br />

At the time of the <strong>org</strong>anization of this large<br />

company and for many years previous the relations<br />

between mine operators and mine operatives.<br />

in what is known as the Pittsburgh district, were<br />

not cordial and pleasant; they were far from being<br />

so. It seemed very easy for either class to impute<br />

to the other the most selfish and unworthy<br />

motives and it seemed very difficult indeed, on the<br />

other hand, to convince either class that the other<br />

might possibly sometimes mean to be fair and<br />

honorable. Of course, there were individual exceptions<br />

but the prevailing attitude of employer<br />

and employe in the Pittsburgh district coal fields<br />

was that of suspicion and hostility. I quote from<br />

an article by Mr. A. R. Hamilton, proprietor and<br />

editor of Tin: <strong>COAL</strong> TRADE BULLETIN', who took<br />

• part in the scenes which he describes and has at<br />

all times been an important factor in bringing<br />

about better conditions:<br />

"Prior to the centralization of the coal business<br />

in the Pittsburgh district five years ago entailing<br />

as it did a readjustment of the attitude of employer<br />

and employe toward each other, this field<br />

was the center of labor disturbances in what is<br />

known as the great central competitive district,<br />

embracing Western and Central Pennsylvania,<br />

West Virginia, Ohio, Indiana and Illinois. This<br />

was inevitable as-the-Pi-t-t-aburgh district was the<br />

basing point for wage rates throughout this vast<br />

central territory. The general wage rate approximately<br />

was as high as the miners in the<br />

Pittsburgh district could force it or as low as the<br />

Pittsburgh operators could depress it. Without<br />

a general <strong>org</strong>anization of the operators and practically<br />

no unamimity of action on their part, even<br />

within district lines, the other fields held back<br />

until the Pittsburgh miners and operators literally<br />

fought it out. Necessarily this meant constant<br />

confusion in the Pittsburgh district. There wa 5<br />

a savage competition, which strangled the trade<br />

and bore more and more heavily on those in the<br />

business until there was no profit in mining coal<br />

and the operator was forced as a general rule to<br />

depend upon his company store for whatever<br />

profit could be wrung from his investment.<br />

"The warfare was so bitter that unfair advantage<br />

was taken in instances of the miner in his<br />

relation to the company store. There was an<br />

endless wrangle, a constant suspicion, unflagging<br />

antagonism, and almost incessant open breach.<br />

Inevitably the conditions in the Pittsburgh district,<br />

the basing point, exercised its influence on<br />

competing fields. So acute and widespread was<br />

the strife that it culminated in 1894 in a general<br />

strike which affected particularly the Pittsburgh,<br />

Ohio and Indiana fields.<br />

"The suspension of work was attended with open<br />

disorder, arson and bloodshed, and culminated in<br />

the Stick Hollow riots in the Pittsburgh district,<br />

in which a fierce fight between armed guards and<br />

strikers resulted in deaths on both sides. It was<br />

a battle without decisive results. It brought no<br />

relief but exaggerated the ill feeling and sharpened<br />

the industrial hardships for both sides. The<br />

years of 1895 and 1896 were given over to a<br />

guerilla warfare in the Pittsburgh district in<br />

which the number of local stoppages per annum<br />

would tax the credulity of the general public were<br />

they presented in statistical array.<br />

"In 1S95 the miners of the Millers and Toms<br />

Run regions of the Pittsburgh district after a long<br />

period of heart-breaking business depression, without<br />

capable leadership and fairly desperate with<br />

hunger, delivered blindly a blow against every<br />

visible aspect of the employing interest that came<br />

within reach. They assembled at Carnegie, nearly<br />

3,000 strong and inflamed by the oratory of agitators,<br />

started on a march across the coal producing<br />

district, armed with torch and bludgeon.<br />

They left in their wake smoking ruins of tipples<br />

and strewed the way with bruised and beaten<br />

victims, who refused to join their strike. It took<br />

a band of determined men with Winchesters to<br />

stop that march, but the anarchistic outburst was<br />

not allayed until there had been a woeful loss of<br />

human life and the jails were choked and rioters<br />

gathered in by scores of sheriff's deputies.<br />

"In 1897 there followed another general strike<br />

wider in scope than the first. This time the<br />

miners were successful in obtaining a higher wage<br />

rate and both miners and operators met to weld<br />

their respective bodies more closely together and<br />

to arrange some system of joint conference by<br />

which a business discussion would take the place<br />

of a strike as a means to substantiate wage claims.<br />

Following firm establishment of this joint conference<br />

system came the centralization of the<br />

companies of the Pittsburgh district and almost<br />

immediately a readjustment of the attitude of<br />

both operator and miners' leader on the labor

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!