i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org
i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org
i STEAM COAL - Clpdigital.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
26 THE <strong>COAL</strong> TRADE BULLETIN.<br />
output last year of 1,480,000 tons. The combined<br />
output of the mines of the Pittsburgh Coal Co.<br />
and its subsidiary companies, including the Monongahela<br />
River Consolidated Coal & Coke Co., is<br />
upwards of 20,000,000 tons of bituminous coal per<br />
annum, which is about 26 per cent, of the total<br />
bituminous output of the state of Pennsylvania,<br />
greater by 3,000,000 tons than the bituminous output<br />
of Ohio, equal to the output of West Virginia,<br />
about 85 per cent, of the output of Illinois, and<br />
about one-ninth of the total bituminous output of<br />
the United States. In addition to this its docks<br />
on the Great Lakes handle about a million tons of<br />
anthracite and a half million tons of bituminous<br />
coals from other fields. The total number of employes<br />
paid over the rolls of the Pittsburgh Coal<br />
Co. and its subsidiary companies averages about<br />
46,000.<br />
At the time of the <strong>org</strong>anization of this large<br />
company and for many years previous the relations<br />
between mine operators and mine operatives.<br />
in what is known as the Pittsburgh district, were<br />
not cordial and pleasant; they were far from being<br />
so. It seemed very easy for either class to impute<br />
to the other the most selfish and unworthy<br />
motives and it seemed very difficult indeed, on the<br />
other hand, to convince either class that the other<br />
might possibly sometimes mean to be fair and<br />
honorable. Of course, there were individual exceptions<br />
but the prevailing attitude of employer<br />
and employe in the Pittsburgh district coal fields<br />
was that of suspicion and hostility. I quote from<br />
an article by Mr. A. R. Hamilton, proprietor and<br />
editor of Tin: <strong>COAL</strong> TRADE BULLETIN', who took<br />
• part in the scenes which he describes and has at<br />
all times been an important factor in bringing<br />
about better conditions:<br />
"Prior to the centralization of the coal business<br />
in the Pittsburgh district five years ago entailing<br />
as it did a readjustment of the attitude of employer<br />
and employe toward each other, this field<br />
was the center of labor disturbances in what is<br />
known as the great central competitive district,<br />
embracing Western and Central Pennsylvania,<br />
West Virginia, Ohio, Indiana and Illinois. This<br />
was inevitable as-the-Pi-t-t-aburgh district was the<br />
basing point for wage rates throughout this vast<br />
central territory. The general wage rate approximately<br />
was as high as the miners in the<br />
Pittsburgh district could force it or as low as the<br />
Pittsburgh operators could depress it. Without<br />
a general <strong>org</strong>anization of the operators and practically<br />
no unamimity of action on their part, even<br />
within district lines, the other fields held back<br />
until the Pittsburgh miners and operators literally<br />
fought it out. Necessarily this meant constant<br />
confusion in the Pittsburgh district. There wa 5<br />
a savage competition, which strangled the trade<br />
and bore more and more heavily on those in the<br />
business until there was no profit in mining coal<br />
and the operator was forced as a general rule to<br />
depend upon his company store for whatever<br />
profit could be wrung from his investment.<br />
"The warfare was so bitter that unfair advantage<br />
was taken in instances of the miner in his<br />
relation to the company store. There was an<br />
endless wrangle, a constant suspicion, unflagging<br />
antagonism, and almost incessant open breach.<br />
Inevitably the conditions in the Pittsburgh district,<br />
the basing point, exercised its influence on<br />
competing fields. So acute and widespread was<br />
the strife that it culminated in 1894 in a general<br />
strike which affected particularly the Pittsburgh,<br />
Ohio and Indiana fields.<br />
"The suspension of work was attended with open<br />
disorder, arson and bloodshed, and culminated in<br />
the Stick Hollow riots in the Pittsburgh district,<br />
in which a fierce fight between armed guards and<br />
strikers resulted in deaths on both sides. It was<br />
a battle without decisive results. It brought no<br />
relief but exaggerated the ill feeling and sharpened<br />
the industrial hardships for both sides. The<br />
years of 1895 and 1896 were given over to a<br />
guerilla warfare in the Pittsburgh district in<br />
which the number of local stoppages per annum<br />
would tax the credulity of the general public were<br />
they presented in statistical array.<br />
"In 1S95 the miners of the Millers and Toms<br />
Run regions of the Pittsburgh district after a long<br />
period of heart-breaking business depression, without<br />
capable leadership and fairly desperate with<br />
hunger, delivered blindly a blow against every<br />
visible aspect of the employing interest that came<br />
within reach. They assembled at Carnegie, nearly<br />
3,000 strong and inflamed by the oratory of agitators,<br />
started on a march across the coal producing<br />
district, armed with torch and bludgeon.<br />
They left in their wake smoking ruins of tipples<br />
and strewed the way with bruised and beaten<br />
victims, who refused to join their strike. It took<br />
a band of determined men with Winchesters to<br />
stop that march, but the anarchistic outburst was<br />
not allayed until there had been a woeful loss of<br />
human life and the jails were choked and rioters<br />
gathered in by scores of sheriff's deputies.<br />
"In 1897 there followed another general strike<br />
wider in scope than the first. This time the<br />
miners were successful in obtaining a higher wage<br />
rate and both miners and operators met to weld<br />
their respective bodies more closely together and<br />
to arrange some system of joint conference by<br />
which a business discussion would take the place<br />
of a strike as a means to substantiate wage claims.<br />
Following firm establishment of this joint conference<br />
system came the centralization of the<br />
companies of the Pittsburgh district and almost<br />
immediately a readjustment of the attitude of<br />
both operator and miners' leader on the labor