15.01.2013 Views

The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Search for How Mutant mtDNA is Amplified<br />

organism, on the basis that if it were disadvantageous then it would have been evolved away.<br />

This has led to the proposal that it increases the potential for regulation <strong>of</strong> metabolism:<br />

organisms may benefit from being able to vary rather rapidly the rate <strong>of</strong> OXPHOS within a<br />

cell, and this is achieved by the presence <strong>of</strong> “futile cycles” (<strong>of</strong> which proton leak would be<br />

one) which act as extra loci <strong>of</strong> control on the steady-state rate. This is sound in principle as<br />

an explanation for having some leak, but it does not appear to explain why some animals<br />

have far more leak than others. Another proposal, 20 which I believe to be logically flawed, is<br />

that proton leak exists as a safety valve to dissipate the mitochondrial proton gradient at<br />

times when the cell is at rest, i.e., using little ATP; the idea is that a high gradient causes<br />

greater production <strong>of</strong> superoxide, which is undesirable. <strong>The</strong> flaw in this is that the gradient<br />

can be controlled in other ways that do not involve the wastage <strong>of</strong> nutrients which leak does:<br />

these include the permeability transition pore, which is available as an emergency safety<br />

valve, and control <strong>of</strong> the rate <strong>of</strong> the precursors to the respiratory chain (the TCA cycle, etc.)<br />

which would have a longer lag but are less drastic. This challenge applies equally to a third<br />

proposal: that leak exists to maintain the cellular NAD + /NADH ratio at a value compatible<br />

with various biosynthetic reactions such as amino acid synthesis. Cells have a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

systems to use for this purpose, including the reversible conversion <strong>of</strong> pyruvate to lactate,<br />

which likewise do not waste nutrients in the way leak does.<br />

This compels one to revisit the precept upon which the search for such uses <strong>of</strong> leak<br />

was founded: that if it were genuinely a bad thing it would have disappeared during<br />

evolution. <strong>The</strong> alternative viewpoint is that it really is a bad thing, but that it is a side-effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> some vital process, and evolution has not found a way to maintain that vital process<br />

without having leak too. A candidate for the vital process in question is readily to hand:<br />

OXPHOS itself. It is generally accepted that one side-effect <strong>of</strong> OXPHOS—superoxide<br />

production—is a bad thing, so evolution already has an imperfect track record in this<br />

regard.<br />

But how could leak be a side-effect <strong>of</strong> OXPHOS, let alone an inevitable one? Remarkably,<br />

a very direct answer to this question has been available in the literature for over 25 years.<br />

LEC-mediated damage affects all macromolecules: in particular, it affects lipids, the molecules<br />

that make up the mitochondrial membranes. <strong>The</strong> only missing link, therefore, is whether<br />

membranes that have suffered LEC-mediated damage are leakier to protons. If they are,<br />

then we have an explanation for proton leak as a deleterious, but inevitable, side-effect <strong>of</strong><br />

mitochondrial function. And indeed, lipid peroxidation does make membranes leakier. 21,22<br />

A couple <strong>of</strong> very recent results confirm this in different ways. If one isolates the lipids<br />

from a preparation <strong>of</strong> mitochondria and reconstructs them as vesicles—usually termed<br />

liposomes—then one can measure their proton leak and compare it to that <strong>of</strong> intact<br />

mitochondria. <strong>The</strong> remarkable finding is that liposomes prepared in this way exhibit only<br />

about 5% <strong>of</strong> the leak <strong>of</strong> intact mitochondria. 23 It is hard to see how this can result from the<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> the non-lipid components <strong>of</strong> mitochondrial membranes (transmembrane<br />

proteins and coenzyme Q), since they are also highly hydrophobic so should repel protons;<br />

but if most leak is caused by peroxidation then a simple explanation emerges. Peroxidation<br />

proceeds as a chain reaction (see Section 3.7), so the products <strong>of</strong> peroxidation in an intact<br />

mitochondrion will be concentrated around the occasional point at which a reaction was<br />

initiated. <strong>The</strong>se locally very high levels <strong>of</strong> membrane damage will constitute “pin-pricks” in<br />

the membrane, through which protons will flow rapidly. Synthesis <strong>of</strong> liposomes, on the<br />

other hand, will homogenise the lipid, spreading the peroxidation products evenly through<br />

it; thus they will have a uniformly low concentration which will only negligibly ease the<br />

passage <strong>of</strong> protons.<br />

<strong>The</strong> second recent study showing the effect <strong>of</strong> peroxidation was an X-ray diffraction<br />

analysis, which allowed the detection <strong>of</strong> peroxidation-induced changes in membrane<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!