15.01.2013 Views

The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

92<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Mitochondrial</strong> <strong>Free</strong> <strong>Radical</strong> <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> <strong>Aging</strong><br />

mutant ones that sparked the replication pulse in the first place. A remarkably neat idea;<br />

and moreover, it was recently shown by direct visualisation 9-11 that, at least in vitro, mtDNA<br />

replication indeed occurs mainly around the nucleus. Unfortunately, though, this proposal<br />

is fraught with statistical difficulties. Firstly, such amplification could not begin until quite<br />

a lot <strong>of</strong> mutant mitochondria had arisen without selection, all <strong>of</strong> which would be equally<br />

amplified thereafter; this seems incompatible with the apparent takeover <strong>of</strong> cells by copies<br />

<strong>of</strong> a single mutation. Secondly, once there are very many mutant mitochondria, their random<br />

movements will tend more and more exactly to cancel each other out, so that variations in<br />

the energy supply near the nucleus would become negligible, as therefore would the replicative<br />

advantage <strong>of</strong> mutant mitochondria. Finally, once there are debilitatingly few respiring<br />

mitochondria, the cell would be replicating mitochondria at full speed all the time, irrespective<br />

<strong>of</strong> mitochondrial distribution (because there would be a perpetual ATP shortage in the<br />

nucleus), so mutants would have no advantage at all.<br />

8.3. A Clue From Yeast<br />

I mentioned in Section 6.3 that suppressiveness, the dominant deficiency <strong>of</strong> respiration<br />

discovered by Ephrussi in the 1950s, 12 was much later to become a clue to MiFRA. It will<br />

already be clear that there are similarities between suppressiveness in yeast and amplification<br />

<strong>of</strong> mutant mtDNA in humans. But the big mechanistic clue from suppressiveness turned up<br />

in the 1980s, 13 and was only identified as such in 1996. It was a study <strong>of</strong> the rate <strong>of</strong> mtDNA<br />

replication in the context <strong>of</strong> suppressiveness. <strong>The</strong> experimenters found that, for most<br />

suppressive strains, the heteroplasmic diploid cells made by fusion <strong>of</strong> a suppressive cell with<br />

a wild-type one did not replicate their mutant mtDNA any more <strong>of</strong>ten than the normal<br />

mtDNA.<br />

This was, with hindsight, a sensational result. If, as one would naturally predict, this<br />

characteristic <strong>of</strong> suppressiveness was also true <strong>of</strong> human cells that amplified mutant mtDNA,<br />

then the search for a mechanism in human cells was starting from a false assumption: that<br />

preferential amplification resulted from preferential replication.<br />

<strong>The</strong> same paper 13 also reported an observation which supported the hypothesis that<br />

suppressiveness and human mtDNA decline were driven by similar mechanisms. This was<br />

that starvation <strong>of</strong> the culture in which heteroplasmic cells were formed, causing a temporary<br />

suspension <strong>of</strong> cell division, markedly increased the levels <strong>of</strong> suppressiveness which the culture<br />

then exhibited, independent <strong>of</strong> genetic factors. This bore a striking similarity to the finding<br />

that non-dividing human cells are much more susceptible to mtDNA decline than dividing<br />

ones 14 (see Section 2.4.6). Moreover, suppressiveness had also been found 15,16 in Neurospora<br />

and Podospora, filamentous fungi which, like a muscle fiber, are syncytial. A subsequent<br />

observation 17 fitted the same scheme: that even amoeba exhibit suppressiveness if they are<br />

kept with the cell cycle arrested for a time.<br />

8.4. Proton Leak: Boon or Bane?<br />

Oxidative phosphorylation relies, as explained in Section 2.3.4, on the inner mitochondrial<br />

membrane’s being impermeable to protons. But <strong>of</strong> course this is not an all-or-nothing condition:<br />

if the membrane is just slightly leaky, so that the occasional proton gets through it, the only<br />

harm done is that the respiratory chain must work a little harder in order to make the required<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> ATP. Membranes are, after all, only a few nanometers thick—and indeed they have<br />

to be that thin, since (among other reasons) otherwise they would be dysfunctionally rigid—so<br />

it is reasonable to expect a trade-<strong>of</strong>f between impermeability and other membrane properties.<br />

And in fact, mitochondrial membranes do exhibit an easily measurable amount <strong>of</strong> this<br />

“proton leak.” 18 Research has been done on it for many years, but its biological role is still<br />

highly controversial. It has been popular 19 to seek reasons why proton leak is valuable to the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!