The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki
The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki
The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
92<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Mitochondrial</strong> <strong>Free</strong> <strong>Radical</strong> <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> <strong>Aging</strong><br />
mutant ones that sparked the replication pulse in the first place. A remarkably neat idea;<br />
and moreover, it was recently shown by direct visualisation 9-11 that, at least in vitro, mtDNA<br />
replication indeed occurs mainly around the nucleus. Unfortunately, though, this proposal<br />
is fraught with statistical difficulties. Firstly, such amplification could not begin until quite<br />
a lot <strong>of</strong> mutant mitochondria had arisen without selection, all <strong>of</strong> which would be equally<br />
amplified thereafter; this seems incompatible with the apparent takeover <strong>of</strong> cells by copies<br />
<strong>of</strong> a single mutation. Secondly, once there are very many mutant mitochondria, their random<br />
movements will tend more and more exactly to cancel each other out, so that variations in<br />
the energy supply near the nucleus would become negligible, as therefore would the replicative<br />
advantage <strong>of</strong> mutant mitochondria. Finally, once there are debilitatingly few respiring<br />
mitochondria, the cell would be replicating mitochondria at full speed all the time, irrespective<br />
<strong>of</strong> mitochondrial distribution (because there would be a perpetual ATP shortage in the<br />
nucleus), so mutants would have no advantage at all.<br />
8.3. A Clue From Yeast<br />
I mentioned in Section 6.3 that suppressiveness, the dominant deficiency <strong>of</strong> respiration<br />
discovered by Ephrussi in the 1950s, 12 was much later to become a clue to MiFRA. It will<br />
already be clear that there are similarities between suppressiveness in yeast and amplification<br />
<strong>of</strong> mutant mtDNA in humans. But the big mechanistic clue from suppressiveness turned up<br />
in the 1980s, 13 and was only identified as such in 1996. It was a study <strong>of</strong> the rate <strong>of</strong> mtDNA<br />
replication in the context <strong>of</strong> suppressiveness. <strong>The</strong> experimenters found that, for most<br />
suppressive strains, the heteroplasmic diploid cells made by fusion <strong>of</strong> a suppressive cell with<br />
a wild-type one did not replicate their mutant mtDNA any more <strong>of</strong>ten than the normal<br />
mtDNA.<br />
This was, with hindsight, a sensational result. If, as one would naturally predict, this<br />
characteristic <strong>of</strong> suppressiveness was also true <strong>of</strong> human cells that amplified mutant mtDNA,<br />
then the search for a mechanism in human cells was starting from a false assumption: that<br />
preferential amplification resulted from preferential replication.<br />
<strong>The</strong> same paper 13 also reported an observation which supported the hypothesis that<br />
suppressiveness and human mtDNA decline were driven by similar mechanisms. This was<br />
that starvation <strong>of</strong> the culture in which heteroplasmic cells were formed, causing a temporary<br />
suspension <strong>of</strong> cell division, markedly increased the levels <strong>of</strong> suppressiveness which the culture<br />
then exhibited, independent <strong>of</strong> genetic factors. This bore a striking similarity to the finding<br />
that non-dividing human cells are much more susceptible to mtDNA decline than dividing<br />
ones 14 (see Section 2.4.6). Moreover, suppressiveness had also been found 15,16 in Neurospora<br />
and Podospora, filamentous fungi which, like a muscle fiber, are syncytial. A subsequent<br />
observation 17 fitted the same scheme: that even amoeba exhibit suppressiveness if they are<br />
kept with the cell cycle arrested for a time.<br />
8.4. Proton Leak: Boon or Bane?<br />
Oxidative phosphorylation relies, as explained in Section 2.3.4, on the inner mitochondrial<br />
membrane’s being impermeable to protons. But <strong>of</strong> course this is not an all-or-nothing condition:<br />
if the membrane is just slightly leaky, so that the occasional proton gets through it, the only<br />
harm done is that the respiratory chain must work a little harder in order to make the required<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> ATP. Membranes are, after all, only a few nanometers thick—and indeed they have<br />
to be that thin, since (among other reasons) otherwise they would be dysfunctionally rigid—so<br />
it is reasonable to expect a trade-<strong>of</strong>f between impermeability and other membrane properties.<br />
And in fact, mitochondrial membranes do exhibit an easily measurable amount <strong>of</strong> this<br />
“proton leak.” 18 Research has been done on it for many years, but its biological role is still<br />
highly controversial. It has been popular 19 to seek reasons why proton leak is valuable to the