The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

pliki.supernova.com.pl
from pliki.supernova.com.pl More from this publisher
15.01.2013 Views

70 The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging Unfortunately, though this correlation certainly exists, it is not a fantastically good correlation. Primates, birds and bats are probably the most extreme classes of homeotherm that live a great deal longer than would be predicted by their sizes and specific metabolic rates. The search has thus continued for other variables which, when added into the equation, give a more universally accurate prediction of species lifespan. 6.5.2. How Does Lifespan Evolve? The search for such factors has been greatly aided by evolutionary biology, so I shall digress for this section into a summary of current theory regarding the evolution of lifespan. I mentioned in Section 5.7.1 that lifespan seems to be rather easily adjustable by evolution; since civilisation has found it so very hard to adjust by medical intervention, we may reasonably ask “why?” Well, first of all: why not? Evolution, of course, works by selecting between slightly different sequences of DNA based on their phenotype, which largely derives from the three-dimensional structure of the proteins that the DNA encodes. The mechanism(s) whereby genetic makeup determines longevity is no different, in this respect, from any other aspect of our physiology: it involves chemical reactions, and those reactions involve macromolecules—mainly proteins. Thus, small changes to those proteins’ three-dimensional structure, due to changes in their sequence, will affect the rates of the reactions in which they participate. So, here is the current evolutionary explanation for both the general “rate of living” correlation and the major exceptions to it.* Fundamental Darwinian logic tells us that all species gravitate, by natural selection, to a lifespan which maximises their chance of producing offspring and raising them to maturity, and that this maximum is a balance between the avoidance of predators and the optimising of the environment in which the offspring will mature. An animal which is at a severe risk of death by predation will be best advised to live its life fast, ensuring that it has some offspring before it succumbs. One whose risk of predation is very low will, conversely, be best advised to wait until the environment is particularly favourable for procreation—for example, until there is a particularly plentiful food supply. And in order to wait, it must invest in better self-maintenance so as to avoid dying of old age. Now, the simplest way of avoiding predation is to be large: this explains why, in general, large animals live long. But that is not the only way to avoid predation: one of the other good ways is to be able to fly, so this also explains why bats and birds live so long. Finally, an even better way to live a long time is to be highly intelligent; that is what gives primates (and, among them, humans) their advantage. This general idea, that the main determinant of lifespan is one’s position in the food chain, is the ecological description of current thinking on the evolution of lifespan. 27 It has also been strikingly confirmed by intraspecies comparisons. 28 Another way to say essentially the same thing is to note that, while the cells of an organism's germ line must be maintained in a pristine state in order to give rise to viable offspring, the rest of us (our somatic cells) need only be maintained well enough to stay just about working throughout the optimal lifespan that our ecological niche determines. This is, naturally, called the disposable soma theory. 29 * This theory is the culmination of a century of analysis of the evolution of lifespan. It and its predecessors, due primarily to Weissmann, Haldane, Medawar and Williams, are discussed in detail in, for example, ref. 43.

History of the Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging, 1954-1995 6.5.3. Molecular Correlations with Longevity In this book, however, the major topic of discussion is not why species have the lifespan they do but how. In other words, we want to identify the molecules whose reaction rates determine the rate of aging, and which therefore vary in detailed structure from one organism to the next in a manner correlated with longevity. Two very strong molecular correlations have indeed been discovered, and they both provide strong circumstantial evidence for the controlling role of oxidative stress in aging. 6.5.3.1. Longevity and Membrane Oxidizability It is difficult to measure directly the rate at which the membranes in a tissue undergo oxidation, because this damage is constantly being put right by turnover of various sorts.* Relatively easy, however, is to measure the composition of a tissue—or of a chemical category extracted from it, such as its lipids. Better still, one can first fractionate the tissue into its cellular components and then determine the lipid composition of a single fraction, such as the mitochondria. When this is done, a very great difference is found between the membranes of short-lived and long-lived animals of similar specific metabolic rate. The same difference is found when comparing rats to pigeons as when comparing horses to humans. 31,32 In both cases, the fatty acid side chains of the phospholipids in the mitochondrial membranes are much less unsaturated on average in the longer-lived animal. The degree of unsaturation of a fatty acid is the number of carbon-carbon double bonds, C=C, in the chain; a fully saturated fatty acid has no C=C bonds, only C-C bonds. This is thus very suggestive of the importance of oxidative stress in aging, because only regions between two C=C bonds of fatty acids are susceptible to oxidation by LECs (see Section 3.9). 33 6.5.3.2. Longevity and Superoxide Production The second correlation, found in some of the same studies, also strongly supports the idea that oxidative stress is central in setting the rate of aging. Longer-lived animals apparently generate less superoxide. 31,34 Their respiratory chain enzymes seem, simply, to be more fastidious about not fumbling electrons. The likelihood that an electron will become detached from a respiratory chain component and annexed by oxygen is likely to be very dependent upon the exact shape of the enzyme in question, which is of course determined by the amino acid sequences of its various subunits.** These sequences are highly conserved in evolution, but differences certainly exist, and they may well cause significant variations in how often an electron can be fumbled. 6.5.4. Longevity and Calorie Restriction During this time, it was also becoming increasingly accepted that calorie restriction (CR—also, unfortunately, often termed DR, ER or FR, for diet, energy and food) could reliably and significantly increase the lifespan of many species, notably laboratory mice: this had in fact been discovered some decades previously. 35,36 Calorie restriction is achieved by * However, there are measures of the rate of repair of some molecules. DNA is an easy one, because many DNA repair processes involve removing a damaged nucleotide and discarding it into the blood stream, and thence into the urine. 30 The quantity of nucleotide derivatives in urine is one of the best measures of the rate of increase of DNA damage with age. ** The non-protein ubisemiquinone is the molecule believed to do most of the fumbling, but recall from Section 2.3.3.3 that it exists only bound to Complexes I and III, so their exact shape is the relevant variable under evolutionary control. 71

History <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Mitochondrial</strong> <strong>Free</strong> <strong>Radical</strong> <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> <strong>Aging</strong>, 1954-1995<br />

6.5.3. Molecular Correlations with Longevity<br />

In this book, however, the major topic <strong>of</strong> discussion is not why species have the lifespan<br />

they do but how. In other words, we want to identify the molecules whose reaction rates<br />

determine the rate <strong>of</strong> aging, and which therefore vary in detailed structure from one organism<br />

to the next in a manner correlated with longevity. Two very strong molecular correlations<br />

have indeed been discovered, and they both provide strong circumstantial evidence<br />

for the controlling role <strong>of</strong> oxidative stress in aging.<br />

6.5.3.1. Longevity and Membrane Oxidizability<br />

It is difficult to measure directly the rate at which the membranes in a tissue undergo<br />

oxidation, because this damage is constantly being put right by turnover <strong>of</strong> various sorts.*<br />

Relatively easy, however, is to measure the composition <strong>of</strong> a tissue—or <strong>of</strong> a chemical category<br />

extracted from it, such as its lipids. Better still, one can first fractionate the tissue into its<br />

cellular components and then determine the lipid composition <strong>of</strong> a single fraction, such as<br />

the mitochondria.<br />

When this is done, a very great difference is found between the membranes <strong>of</strong> short-lived<br />

and long-lived animals <strong>of</strong> similar specific metabolic rate. <strong>The</strong> same difference is found when<br />

comparing rats to pigeons as when comparing horses to humans. 31,32 In both cases, the fatty<br />

acid side chains <strong>of</strong> the phospholipids in the mitochondrial membranes are much less unsaturated<br />

on average in the longer-lived animal. <strong>The</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> unsaturation <strong>of</strong> a fatty acid is<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> carbon-carbon double bonds, C=C, in the chain; a fully saturated fatty acid<br />

has no C=C bonds, only C-C bonds. This is thus very suggestive <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong> oxidative<br />

stress in aging, because only regions between two C=C bonds <strong>of</strong> fatty acids are susceptible<br />

to oxidation by LECs (see Section 3.9). 33<br />

6.5.3.2. Longevity and Superoxide Production<br />

<strong>The</strong> second correlation, found in some <strong>of</strong> the same studies, also strongly supports the<br />

idea that oxidative stress is central in setting the rate <strong>of</strong> aging. Longer-lived animals apparently<br />

generate less superoxide. 31,34 <strong>The</strong>ir respiratory chain enzymes seem, simply, to be more<br />

fastidious about not fumbling electrons. <strong>The</strong> likelihood that an electron will become detached<br />

from a respiratory chain component and annexed by oxygen is likely to be very dependent<br />

upon the exact shape <strong>of</strong> the enzyme in question, which is <strong>of</strong> course determined by the<br />

amino acid sequences <strong>of</strong> its various subunits.** <strong>The</strong>se sequences are highly conserved in<br />

evolution, but differences certainly exist, and they may well cause significant variations in<br />

how <strong>of</strong>ten an electron can be fumbled.<br />

6.5.4. Longevity and Calorie Restriction<br />

During this time, it was also becoming increasingly accepted that calorie restriction<br />

(CR—also, unfortunately, <strong>of</strong>ten termed DR, ER or FR, for diet, energy and food) could<br />

reliably and significantly increase the lifespan <strong>of</strong> many species, notably laboratory mice: this<br />

had in fact been discovered some decades previously. 35,36 Calorie restriction is achieved by<br />

* However, there are measures <strong>of</strong> the rate <strong>of</strong> repair <strong>of</strong> some molecules. DNA is an easy one, because many DNA<br />

repair processes involve removing a damaged nucleotide and discarding it into the blood stream, and thence<br />

into the urine. 30 <strong>The</strong> quantity <strong>of</strong> nucleotide derivatives in urine is one <strong>of</strong> the best measures <strong>of</strong> the rate <strong>of</strong><br />

increase <strong>of</strong> DNA damage with age.<br />

** <strong>The</strong> non-protein ubisemiquinone is the molecule believed to do most <strong>of</strong> the fumbling, but recall from<br />

Section 2.3.3.3 that it exists only bound to Complexes I and III, so their exact shape is the relevant variable<br />

under evolutionary control.<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!