The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

pliki.supernova.com.pl
from pliki.supernova.com.pl More from this publisher
15.01.2013 Views

An Introduction to Mitochondria 56. Okimoto R, Macfarlane JL, Clary DO et al. The mitochondrial genomes of two nematodes, Caenorhabditis elegans and Ascaris suum. Genetics 1992; 130:471-498. 57. Hoffmann RJ, Boore JL, Brown WM. A novel mitochondrial genome organization for the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis. Genetics 1992; 131:397-412. 58. Kitano H, Sekito T, Ishitomi H et al. The distribution of ND genes in yeast mitochondrial genomes and the mitochondrial DNA structure of Pichia membranaefacens. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 1995; 34:23-24. 59. de Vries S, van Witzenburg R, Grivell LA et al. Primary structure and import pathway of the rotenone-insensitive NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase of mitochondria from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 1992 Eur J Biochem 1992; 203:587-592. 60. Caron F, Jacq C, Rouviere-Yaniv J. Characterization of a histone-like protein extracted from yeast mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1979; 76:4265-4269. 61. Clayton DA, Doda JN, Friedberg EC. The absence of a pyrimidine dimer repair mechanism in mammalian mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1974; 71:2777-2781. 62. a)Corral-Debrinski M, Shoffner JM, Lott MT et al. Association of mitochondrial DNA damage with aging and coronary atherosclerotic heart disease. Mutat Res 1992; 275:169-180. 62. b)Schon EA, Rizzuto R, Moraes CT et al. A direct repeat is a hotspot for large-scale deletion of human mitochondrial DNA. Science 1989; 244:346-349. 63. Kunkel TA, Loeb LA. Fidelity of mammalian DNA polymerases. Science 1981; 213:765-767. 64. Wernette CM, Conway MC, Kaguni LS. Mitochondrial DNA polymerase from Drosophila melanogaster embryos: Kinetics, processivity, and fidelity of DNA polymerization. Biochemistry 1988; 27:6046-6054. 65. Brown GG, Simpson MV. Novel features of animal mtDNA evolution as shown by sequences of two rat cytochrome oxidase subunit II genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1982; 79:3246-3250. 66. Khrapko K, Coller HA, Andre PC et al. Mitochondrial mutational spectra in human cells and tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94:13798-13803. 67. Keohavong P, Thilly WG. Fidelity of DNA polymerases in DNA amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989; 86:9253-9257. 68. Cheng KC, Cahill DS, Kasai H et al. 8-Hydroxyguanine, an abundant form of oxidative DNA damage, causes G-T and A-C substitutions. J Biol Chem 1992; 267:166-172. 69. Lauber J, Marsac C, Kadenbach B et al. Mutations in mitochondrial tRNA genes: A frequent cause of neuromuscular diseases. Nucleic Acids Res 1991; 19:1393-1397. 70. Fletcher MJ, Sanadi DR. Turnover of rat-liver mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta 1961; 51:356-360. 71. Gosalvez M, Diaz-Gil J, Coloma J et al. Spectral and metabolic characteristics of mitochondrial fractions from rotenone-induced tumours. Br J Cancer 1977; 36:243-253. 72. Fawcett DW, Bloom W. A textbook of histology. 12th ed. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1994. 73. Cortopassi GA, Shibata D, Soong NW et al. A pattern of accumulation of a somatic deletion of mitochondrial DNA in aging human tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89:7370-7374. 33

CHAPTER 3 An Introduction to Free Radicals 3.1. Another Terminological Apology: “Pairing” of Electrons It is most unfortunate that the term “free radical” has become so firmly entrenched in the vocabulary of gerontology, especially in the popular press. The problem is that the meaning which is generally attached to it has several major differences from its strict chemical definition. Free radicals are a class of molecule with a very simple definition. The nature of atomic structure and of the covalent chemical bond, the features that give an atom its valency, are underpinned by the rule that electrons occupy orbitals of atoms, such that an orbital can contain zero, one or two electrons, and that electrons carry less energy when they are one of a pair in an orbital than when they are unpaired. A molecule is a free radical if and only if it possesses any unpaired electrons. That’s all. Some are composed of only two atoms; some are huge, being made by removing one electron from, for example, a protein or a chromosome. If one were to try to infer what a free radical is solely from reading the gerontological literature, however, one would form the impression that a free radical is a small, highly reactive, highly toxic, oxygen-centred molecule which can be rendered less toxic by the addition or removal of one electron. This is a clear case of a little knowledge being a dangerous thing; it is near enough to the real definition to seem trustworthy, but it can easily cause misunderstanding of important details. So, what are the specific differences between these two definitions? Superficially, “unpaired” might be thought to connote that free radicals have an odd number of electrons, whereas all other molecules have an even number. Unfortunately, “pairedness” is defined in terms of the physical interactions of a molecule’s electrons, and those interactions are much more complicated than that. For a start, the vagaries of atomic structure in fact allow a molecule to have two unpaired electrons at once. Such molecules are called diradicals. In practice, however, the only diradical which will concern us is molecular oxygen (O2), and its electrons are arranged in such a way that, for purposes of reactivity, its unpaired electrons behave rather as if they are paired after all.* Another class of chemical which sometimes breaks the correlation between pairedness and evenness is atoms. Atoms that contain an odd number of electrons are not called free radicals, and indeed those that exist in cells do not quite behave in the same way as bona fide free radicals do. Some of the most biologically important examples are atoms of transition metals, which can carry varying numbers of electrons; iron and copper, in particular, will feature extensively in this book. But curiously, these atoms are both more “free-radical-like” when carrying an even number of electrons! * The electrons of O2 can be arranged differently, so that it does behave like a radical: it is then termed singlet oxygen. This variant of O2 is written 1 O2 and plays a role in light-induced skin damage; 1a see also Table 3.3 and Section 11.2.3. The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging, by Aubrey D.N.J. de Grey. ©1999 R.G. Landes Company.

CHAPTER 3<br />

An Introduction to <strong>Free</strong> <strong>Radical</strong>s<br />

3.1. Another Terminological Apology: “Pairing” <strong>of</strong> Electrons<br />

It is most unfortunate that the term “free radical” has become so firmly entrenched in the<br />

vocabulary <strong>of</strong> gerontology, especially in the popular press. <strong>The</strong> problem is that the meaning<br />

which is generally attached to it has several major differences from its strict chemical<br />

definition.<br />

<strong>Free</strong> radicals are a class <strong>of</strong> molecule with a very simple definition. <strong>The</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> atomic<br />

structure and <strong>of</strong> the covalent chemical bond, the features that give an atom its valency, are<br />

underpinned by the rule that electrons occupy orbitals <strong>of</strong> atoms, such that an orbital can<br />

contain zero, one or two electrons, and that electrons carry less energy when they are one <strong>of</strong> a<br />

pair in an orbital than when they are unpaired. A molecule is a free radical if and only if it<br />

possesses any unpaired electrons. That’s all. Some are composed <strong>of</strong> only two atoms; some are<br />

huge, being made by removing one electron from, for example, a protein or a chromosome.<br />

If one were to try to infer what a free radical is solely from reading the gerontological<br />

literature, however, one would form the impression that a free radical is a small, highly<br />

reactive, highly toxic, oxygen-centred molecule which can be rendered less toxic by the<br />

addition or removal <strong>of</strong> one electron. This is a clear case <strong>of</strong> a little knowledge being a dangerous<br />

thing; it is near enough to the real definition to seem trustworthy, but it can easily cause<br />

misunderstanding <strong>of</strong> important details.<br />

So, what are the specific differences between these two definitions? Superficially,<br />

“unpaired” might be thought to connote that free radicals have an odd number <strong>of</strong> electrons,<br />

whereas all other molecules have an even number. Unfortunately, “pairedness” is defined in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> the physical interactions <strong>of</strong> a molecule’s electrons, and those interactions are much<br />

more complicated than that. For a start, the vagaries <strong>of</strong> atomic structure in fact allow a<br />

molecule to have two unpaired electrons at once. Such molecules are called diradicals. In<br />

practice, however, the only diradical which will concern us is molecular oxygen (O2), and its<br />

electrons are arranged in such a way that, for purposes <strong>of</strong> reactivity, its unpaired electrons<br />

behave rather as if they are paired after all.*<br />

Another class <strong>of</strong> chemical which sometimes breaks the correlation between pairedness<br />

and evenness is atoms. Atoms that contain an odd number <strong>of</strong> electrons are not called free<br />

radicals, and indeed those that exist in cells do not quite behave in the same way as bona fide<br />

free radicals do. Some <strong>of</strong> the most biologically important examples are atoms <strong>of</strong> transition<br />

metals, which can carry varying numbers <strong>of</strong> electrons; iron and copper, in particular, will<br />

feature extensively in this book. But curiously, these atoms are both more “free-radical-like”<br />

when carrying an even number <strong>of</strong> electrons!<br />

* <strong>The</strong> electrons <strong>of</strong> O2 can be arranged differently, so that it does behave like a radical: it is then termed singlet<br />

oxygen. This variant <strong>of</strong> O2 is written 1 O2 and plays a role in light-induced skin damage; 1a see also Table 3.3<br />

and Section 11.2.3.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Mitochondrial</strong> <strong>Free</strong> <strong>Radical</strong> <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> <strong>Aging</strong>, by Aubrey D.N.J. de Grey.<br />

©1999 R.G. Landes Company.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!