The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki
The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki
The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
An Introduction to Mitochondria<br />
2.4.5. <strong>The</strong> Vulnerability <strong>of</strong> mtDNA and <strong>Mitochondrial</strong> Function<br />
<strong>The</strong> 13 proteins encoded in the mtDNA are absolutely essential for OXPHOS to occur.<br />
It is therefore just as important for an organism to maintain its mtDNA intact (in all cells,<br />
not simply the germ line) as to maintain its nuclear, chromosomal DNA. However, for reasons<br />
connected with mitochondria’s evolutionary origin (which was described in Section 2.1),<br />
cells fail to maintain their mtDNA to the nuclear standard. <strong>The</strong> mtDNA is much more<br />
prone to suffer spontaneous changes to its sequence, which result in the production <strong>of</strong><br />
incorrect or truncated proteins—or, in some cases, failure to produce any protein at all.<br />
This vulnerability takes several forms. Firstly, the mtDNA is much more exposed than<br />
the nuclear DNA to free radicals that can induce mutations. This is because mitochondria<br />
are the main cellular site <strong>of</strong> production <strong>of</strong> free radicals; this will be explained in Section 3.3.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are no mitochondria in the nucleus, so the nuclear DNA is exposed to a much lower<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> free radicals.<br />
A second source <strong>of</strong> mtDNA vulnerability is that it is “naked.” Nuclear DNA is always<br />
wrapped around special proteins called histones, which keep it somewhat protected from<br />
mutagenic attack. mtDNA does not have these. 60<br />
Another reason is that, once damage is done to it, mtDNA is less well repaired than<br />
nuclear DNA. Certain classes <strong>of</strong> damage to DNA are rapidly reversed when they occur in the<br />
nucleus, but do not get mended in mitochondria. For some years it was believed that mtDNA<br />
was not repaired at all, but this was a piece <strong>of</strong> bad luck: the first researchers to address this<br />
question 61 had happened to analyse a class <strong>of</strong> damage called a pyrimidine dimer,* which<br />
indeed is not repaired at all in mtDNA, and most investigators incorrectly presumed that<br />
this was true <strong>of</strong> other types <strong>of</strong> damage too.<br />
Yet another problem for mtDNA is that it contains a high level <strong>of</strong> short sequences<br />
which appear twice, some way apart. This is dangerous, because it is possible for the circular<br />
mtDNA molecule to wrap around into a figure <strong>of</strong> eight, with the two identical sequences<br />
lying next to each other. When that happens, there is occasionally a “crossover”—the strands<br />
come apart and join up the other way, just as chromosomes do in meiosis. For a mtDNA<br />
molecule, however, this is fatal, because the single circle <strong>of</strong> DNA becomes two circles, each<br />
with only a subset <strong>of</strong> the necessary genetic material (see Fig. 2.11). Worse yet, one <strong>of</strong> those<br />
two circles will be without the D loop, a small stretch <strong>of</strong> DNA which contains no genes but<br />
which is essential for initiating replication <strong>of</strong> the molecule. Thus, the circle without the D<br />
loop will never be replicated and will eventually be lost, so that the final result is a deletion<br />
<strong>of</strong> a large chunk <strong>of</strong> the mtDNA. Indeed, these are easily detected in humans in vivo. In<br />
theory, the longer the stretch <strong>of</strong> duplicated sequence the greater will be the tendency for this<br />
to occur. In practice, one particular deletion is much more prevalent than any other 62a —so<br />
* <strong>The</strong> four nucleotides that endow DNA with its informational content are classified into two sets <strong>of</strong> two, on<br />
account <strong>of</strong> their atomic structure. Cytosine and thymine are pyrimidines, with a single-ring structure;<br />
adenine and guanine are purines, which have a double-ring structure. Thus, the complementary bases on<br />
opposite strands <strong>of</strong> the double helix are always one pyrimidine and one purine. <strong>The</strong> other discriminant,<br />
which causes (e.g.) adenine always to be paired with thymine rather than with cytosine, is that adenine and<br />
thymine are prone to form two hydrogen bonds whereas guanine and cytosine form three (see Fig. 2.10). A<br />
pyrimidine dimer is the result <strong>of</strong> a covalent bond being formed between adjacent pyrimidines on the same<br />
strand.<br />
25