15.01.2013 Views

The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Transgenic Copies <strong>of</strong> mtDNA: Techniques and Hurdles<br />

Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, <strong>of</strong>fers even more opportunity: its mtDNA encodes only seven<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 13. 21 But, currently, there is no information regarding the missing six. Much further<br />

work is clearly needed in identifying and experimenting with nuclear-coded homologues <strong>of</strong><br />

our mt-coded genes.<br />

A second highly relevant aspect <strong>of</strong> import is chaperones. <strong>The</strong> (nuclear-coded) beta<br />

subunit <strong>of</strong> the yeast ATPase has an anomalously long presequence; it was recently shown 15<br />

that this sequence acts as a cis-chaperone, keeping the business end <strong>of</strong> the protein in a<br />

semi-unfolded state while it is still in the cytosol, so that import is easier than if it had folded<br />

up into its final configuration. An even more encouraging finding <strong>of</strong> this study 15 was that<br />

this property <strong>of</strong> the presequence was not specific to that one protein: it also accelerated the<br />

import <strong>of</strong> other proteins to which it was attached. It has not yet been tried on the mt-coded<br />

proteins; the results will be <strong>of</strong> great interest.<br />

15.11. Do We Really Need Complex I?<br />

I mentioned in Section 2.4.4 that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast) mtDNA encodes<br />

only six <strong>of</strong> the 13 proteins that ours does, but that this was not helpful in the same way as the<br />

plants discussed above, because the seven others are not present in the S. cerevisiae nucleus<br />

either. <strong>The</strong> huge, 40-odd-subunit Complex I that accepts electrons from intramitochondrial<br />

NADH and passes them to ubiquinone has been completely discarded, and in its place there<br />

is an enzyme which is composed <strong>of</strong> only one (nuclear-coded) polypeptide. This enzyme<br />

does exactly the same job ... except for one thing: it does no proton-pumping.<br />

This led most people, myself included, to give no further thought to the relevance <strong>of</strong><br />

yeast to development <strong>of</strong> this technology. Seo et al 22 were not so unimaginative. A number <strong>of</strong><br />

diseases are known which stem from mutations in Complex I subunits, so it is clear that we<br />

need it; but, they thought, do we actually need its proton-pumping? Could the toxicity <strong>of</strong><br />

these mutations be primarily due, instead, to the production <strong>of</strong> more LECs, or to the impaired<br />

recycling <strong>of</strong> NADH back to NAD + ? To test this possibility, they introduced a copy <strong>of</strong><br />

the yeast gene into mammalian cells: this was easy, because (being nuclear-coded) it already<br />

uses the same genetic code, and furthermore the mammalian mitochondrial processing<br />

peptidase (the protein which removes the presequence <strong>of</strong> imported proteins after they are<br />

imported into mitochondria) recognises the same cleavage sequence as the yeast one, so no<br />

re-engineering whatsoever was needed. At the time <strong>of</strong> writing only very preliminary results<br />

are available, but cells mutant in Complex I but expressing this transgenic yeast gene appear<br />

to grow faster than controls, and also to use less glucose, indicating that they are performing<br />

OXPHOS with the yeast protein. A further indication <strong>of</strong> OXPHOS function is that these<br />

cells can grow well on galactose, which is a much poorer substrate for glycolysis than glucose.<br />

23 Furthermore, they appear to generate fewer LECs: this may be because Complex I is<br />

probably the major site <strong>of</strong> LEC production in the respiratory chain, whereas the yeast enzyme<br />

may work by direct two-electron transfer from NADH to ubiquinone, i.e., not generate<br />

the risky ubisemiquinone intermediate. (Recall that this is thought to be how the mammalian<br />

FAD-dependent electron transporters, such as Complex II, avoid LEC<br />

production—see Section 11.2.1.) If this idea really works, the impact on development <strong>of</strong><br />

protein import would be dramatic, since, <strong>of</strong> the six mt-coded proteins which have so far not<br />

been found nuclear-coded in any species, four are subunits <strong>of</strong> Complex I.<br />

15.12. Cotranslational Import<br />

<strong>The</strong> idea that a protein’s hydrophobicity hinders its importability into the mitochondrion<br />

is based on the assumption that the complete protein exists in the cytosol at some point.<br />

This is not necessarily so. Many extracellular proteins are secreted from the cell while they<br />

are being built, so that only a very short stretch <strong>of</strong> the protein is ever in the cytoplasm. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

183

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!