The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

pliki.supernova.com.pl
from pliki.supernova.com.pl More from this publisher
15.01.2013 Views

146 The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging postulates he had originally discussed (and all of which had, even by 1966, already been quite thoroughly confirmed by experiment). This new assertion is that the bulk aqueous phases inside and outside the mitochondrial inner membrane are each electrochemically homogeneous: that the combination of the electrical potential and the pH is the same everywhere in the matrix and also the same everywhere in the cytosol, so that the difference between the two—the proton-motive force, as Mitchell had defined it—would be the same when measured between any point in the cytosol and any point in the matrix as it was across any of the OXPHOS enzymes. This model is known as the delocalized chemiosmotic theory. This may seem, at first hearing, to be an altogether uncontroversial assertion. After all, the pH and electrical potential are formed by protons and other ions, all of which can surely move freely throughout the aqueous space that they occupy (the matrix or the cytosol), so it seems hard to question the assertion, i.e. to propose a proton-motive force between two points within the same aqueous compartment. Indeed, no one really did question it—until they were forced to. Researchers of course sought to measure the proton-motive force between the cytosol and the matrix in order to test this refined chemiosmotic hypothesis. This was not very easy, though, because mitochondria are so small. One cannot get an electrode inside a mitochondrion, for example. Therefore, measurements were made by indirect means: by measuring the rate at which detectable (usually fluorescent) ions passed through the membrane in appropriate conditions, and calculating how strongly they were being pushed. 33,34 These experiments confirmed that the proton-motive force was about what it needed to be to drive ATP synthesis. But in 1969, Henry Tedeschi and colleagues reported 35 a much lower—indeed, negligible—value. This would have been unexciting if their method of measuring it had been similar to what others had used; it is, after all, not uncommon in science for experiments whose design initially seems valid to be found at fault in later years. But they had used a method which was not the same at all, and which, most importantly, was far more direct. They had succeeded in doing what I just said was impossible—getting an electrode inside a mitochondrion, thus allowing them to measure the potential difference between the matrix and the cytosol purely electrically, avoiding any inferences based on the behaviour of chemicals not present in vivo. They did this initially by using mitochondria that are a great deal larger than normal, and in later experiments by making normal mitochondria swell. This result was not well received. For the next decade and more, bioenergeticists raised challenge after challenge to the validity of Tedeschi’s techniques and/or results. Each time, he and his coworkers responded by improving the experimental design so as to confirm that the result was real. In the late 1970s, they succeeded in showing that the mitochondria were generating ATP at the usual rate, even while they were impaled by an electrode and their Δψ was being measured (and found to be about zero). 36 They also showed, by ingenious use of a mitochondrion impaled by two electrodes, that the impalement was real—that the electrode was not just encased in an invagination of the (unpunctured) membrane. 37 Finally, in 1984 they eliminated the possibility that the swelling of the mitochondrion had somehow lowered its internal pH, allowing ΔpH to drive ATP synthesis unaided. 38 Most specialists, however, remain sure to this day that, robust though the evidence appears to be that these measurements are reliable, the chemiosmotic theory is simply too well confirmed to be rejected on this basis. (No discussion whatever has appeared regarding the challenge to Mitchell’s model posed by the superoxide dismutation results discussed in Section 11.2.3, 21 doubtless because they were not presented as such.) They have decided that there must be something wrong with the experiments that report inadequate Δψ, even though exactly what is wrong has not been established. But, as stressed above, Tedeschi’s

A Challenge from Textbook Bioenergetics and Free Radical Chemistry results do not challenge the chemiosmotic theory sensu 1961, only its later elaboration. Conversely, verifications of the chemiosmotic theory have involved the way in which mitochondria function, and in how this function can be inhibited or stimulated. They have not, in particular, addressed directly the question of whether the immediate environment of the mitochondrial membrane is (for these purposes) faithfully represented by measurements of the medium some way away from the membrane. 11.3.3. Macroscopic Restriction of Ion Movement One important factor that may well have caused Tedeschi’s work to be so poorly received was that he never proposed an alternative hypothesis to Mitchell’s. In fairness, though, it is indeed hard to see how an aqueous compartment can be anything other than electrochemically homogeneous, because ions—especially protons—diffuse so fantastically fast in water. One candidate for a barrier to homogeneity 39 is the shape of the inner membrane. The intricate cristae into which it is folded will inevitably hinder the flow of protons, and it is reasonable to suppose that occasionally the membrane will come together and separate a scrap of cytosol in the intermembrane space from the main bulk. Topologically, that scrap of cytosol would then resemble the inside of a chloroplast’s thylakoid membrane: since it was no longer in electrochemical contact with the cytosol, proton-pumping would be able to acidify it sufficiently that the pH difference across the membrane could drive ATP synthesis unaided. But this will probably not happen often enough, or anyway not for long enough at a stretch, to affect the pH to a chemically significant degree. Moreover, we must recall that some of Tedeschi’s experiments were performed with “giant” mitochondria, whose outer membrane had been removed and whose inner membrane had then been swollen by osmosis to its maximum possible size—in other words, ironing out all the cristae. And those mitochondria still phosphorylated properly, with apparently not nearly as much bulk-tobulk proton gradient as should be needed according to Mitchell. So this idea—which can be termed the “pseudothylakoid hypothesis”—is not the answer. 11.3.4. Totally Localized Coupling So far, we have seen that in order to reconcile Tedeschi’s results with Mitchell’s 1961 theory, protons must somehow be restrained from rapid movement in all three dimensions within the cytosol and the matrix. There are two basic alternatives to three-dimensional proton movement, and both have been explored: namely, two-dimensional and one-dimensional. The one-dimensional version has been tested experimentally, and appears not to be true. What it says is that the primary proton pumps (the enzymes of the respiratory chain) and the secondary ones (the ATP synthases) are arranged in one-to-one juxtaposition, either all the time or periodically, such that they pass protons between them by direct contact. If this were so, protons would by and large never escape into the bulk aqueous phase, so we would indeed not see a Δψ. A rather elegant test of this involves noting that it predicts not only an inhibition of proton movement into the bulk, but also inhibition of proton leak across the membrane. As noted in Section 8.4, leak exists in an easily measurable amount; it varies with the proton-motive force, as one would expect. Now, the proton gradient can be reduced by adding an ionophore (a chemical that simply makes the membrane leakier to ions), such as carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (mercifully abbreviated FCCP); and it can also be reduced by adding ADP and phosphate, because that will stimulate the ATP synthase to work faster and dissipate the proton gradient. So, if the ATP synthase receives its protons only by a direct transfer from a respiratory chain enzyme, then adding ADP and phosphate will cause a rapid loss of proton gradient and rise in respiration rate, whereas the 147

A Challenge from Textbook Bioenergetics and <strong>Free</strong> <strong>Radical</strong> Chemistry<br />

results do not challenge the chemiosmotic theory sensu 1961, only its later elaboration.<br />

Conversely, verifications <strong>of</strong> the chemiosmotic theory have involved the way in which<br />

mitochondria function, and in how this function can be inhibited or stimulated. <strong>The</strong>y have<br />

not, in particular, addressed directly the question <strong>of</strong> whether the immediate environment<br />

<strong>of</strong> the mitochondrial membrane is (for these purposes) faithfully represented by<br />

measurements <strong>of</strong> the medium some way away from the membrane.<br />

11.3.3. Macroscopic Restriction <strong>of</strong> Ion Movement<br />

One important factor that may well have caused Tedeschi’s work to be so poorly<br />

received was that he never proposed an alternative hypothesis to Mitchell’s. In fairness,<br />

though, it is indeed hard to see how an aqueous compartment can be anything other than<br />

electrochemically homogeneous, because ions—especially protons—diffuse so fantastically<br />

fast in water.<br />

One candidate for a barrier to homogeneity 39 is the shape <strong>of</strong> the inner membrane. <strong>The</strong><br />

intricate cristae into which it is folded will inevitably hinder the flow <strong>of</strong> protons, and it is<br />

reasonable to suppose that occasionally the membrane will come together and separate a<br />

scrap <strong>of</strong> cytosol in the intermembrane space from the main bulk. Topologically, that scrap<br />

<strong>of</strong> cytosol would then resemble the inside <strong>of</strong> a chloroplast’s thylakoid membrane: since it<br />

was no longer in electrochemical contact with the cytosol, proton-pumping would be able<br />

to acidify it sufficiently that the pH difference across the membrane could drive ATP synthesis<br />

unaided. But this will probably not happen <strong>of</strong>ten enough, or anyway not for long enough at<br />

a stretch, to affect the pH to a chemically significant degree. Moreover, we must recall that<br />

some <strong>of</strong> Tedeschi’s experiments were performed with “giant” mitochondria, whose outer<br />

membrane had been removed and whose inner membrane had then been swollen by osmosis<br />

to its maximum possible size—in other words, ironing out all the cristae. And those<br />

mitochondria still phosphorylated properly, with apparently not nearly as much bulk-tobulk<br />

proton gradient as should be needed according to Mitchell. So this idea—which can be<br />

termed the “pseudothylakoid hypothesis”—is not the answer.<br />

11.3.4. Totally Localized Coupling<br />

So far, we have seen that in order to reconcile Tedeschi’s results with Mitchell’s 1961<br />

theory, protons must somehow be restrained from rapid movement in all three dimensions<br />

within the cytosol and the matrix. <strong>The</strong>re are two basic alternatives to three-dimensional<br />

proton movement, and both have been explored: namely, two-dimensional and<br />

one-dimensional. <strong>The</strong> one-dimensional version has been tested experimentally, and appears<br />

not to be true. What it says is that the primary proton pumps (the enzymes <strong>of</strong> the respiratory<br />

chain) and the secondary ones (the ATP synthases) are arranged in one-to-one juxtaposition,<br />

either all the time or periodically, such that they pass protons between them by direct contact.<br />

If this were so, protons would by and large never escape into the bulk aqueous phase, so we<br />

would indeed not see a Δψ.<br />

A rather elegant test <strong>of</strong> this involves noting that it predicts not only an inhibition <strong>of</strong><br />

proton movement into the bulk, but also inhibition <strong>of</strong> proton leak across the membrane. As<br />

noted in Section 8.4, leak exists in an easily measurable amount; it varies with the<br />

proton-motive force, as one would expect. Now, the proton gradient can be reduced by<br />

adding an ionophore (a chemical that simply makes the membrane leakier to ions), such as<br />

carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (mercifully abbreviated FCCP); and<br />

it can also be reduced by adding ADP and phosphate, because that will stimulate the ATP<br />

synthase to work faster and dissipate the proton gradient. So, if the ATP synthase receives its<br />

protons only by a direct transfer from a respiratory chain enzyme, then adding ADP and<br />

phosphate will cause a rapid loss <strong>of</strong> proton gradient and rise in respiration rate, whereas the<br />

147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!