15.01.2013 Views

The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Frequently-Asked Questions<br />

for almost as long as mtDNA’s circularity. 45 Conditions that select for fusion will necessarily<br />

also select for recombination, as a way <strong>of</strong> stabilising the hybrid genotype <strong>of</strong> the mitochondrion<br />

and thereby protecting it from genetic drift, as shown in Figure 10.2. And indeed, a more<br />

recent study 46 which essentially repeated the above work 44 but using genotypes in which<br />

recombination products could be easily detected, found them in large quantity.<br />

In conclusion, therefore, the evidence that incomplete and/or rare fusion <strong>of</strong><br />

mitochondria occurs is very strong, but the evidence that it occurs fully and frequently<br />

enough to obliterate the forces <strong>of</strong> intermitochondrial Darwinian selection is not at all<br />

strong. <strong>The</strong> evidence does not, therefore, constitute a challenge to the admissibility <strong>of</strong> SOS<br />

as the mechanism <strong>of</strong> mitochondrial decline during aging.<br />

10.9. Why Doesn’t the Body Just Let (or Make) Affected Cells Die?<br />

This question has a simple, short answer: we don’t know. In fact, it is not all that easy to<br />

establish incontrovertibly that such cells do not indeed die and get replaced. This would<br />

give a simple explanation for why we see so few: they struggle on for a little while but then<br />

succumb, so the ones we see are those which have gone anaerobic only very recently.<br />

This sounds splendid in principle, but—at least in muscle—it seems to be wrong,<br />

probably because <strong>of</strong> the segmental distribution <strong>of</strong> anaerobic regions in fibers. <strong>The</strong> body can<br />

repair grossly damaged muscle by proliferation <strong>of</strong> satellite cells to make new fibers, and this<br />

includes fusion <strong>of</strong> new fibers with the surviving parts <strong>of</strong> old ones, but the gradual reduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> fiber number during aging 47 suggests that the body may be unable to replace a small<br />

segment <strong>of</strong> one fiber in the middle <strong>of</strong> a bundle <strong>of</strong> healthy ones. If so, the only option would<br />

be to replace the whole fiber—or, possibly, many fibers—when a segment fails; this scale <strong>of</strong><br />

fiber turnover would be highly inefficient.<br />

<strong>The</strong> theory that muscle turnover occurs in response to mitochondrial decline is also<br />

challenged by the observed steady accumulation <strong>of</strong> damaged fiber segments. As noted in<br />

Section 5.6, any turnover at all should (if anaerobic cells are indeed the main sources <strong>of</strong><br />

systemic oxidative stress) lead to an eventual equilibrium situation, where cells are dying<br />

and being replaced as rapidly as they are suffering OXPHOS collapse, and not to the steady<br />

accumulation <strong>of</strong> anaerobic cells that is in fact seen.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is the possibility, however, that whole fibers are destroyed without replacement.<br />

This may occur, and would contribute to loss <strong>of</strong> muscle mass with aging. Moreover, the loss<br />

<strong>of</strong> muscle mass with aging is known to impair many homeostatic mechanisms, 48,49 so can<br />

cause increased oxidative stress and accelerate mtDNA damage. This possibility needs further<br />

detailed investigation—perhaps also in negligibly senescing species (see Section 12.3).<br />

Cells <strong>of</strong> some other tissues (such as the liver), however, which can divide on demand<br />

but actually do so rather rarely, probably are destroyed fairly quickly when they become<br />

anaerobic. If they did not, we would expect to see nearly the same level <strong>of</strong> anaerobic cells<br />

there as in muscle—in fact, probably even more, since the energy utilisation in the liver is<br />

very high—but we in fact see only a smaller proportion. (Cells in the liver certainly die for<br />

many other reasons, though, so we cannot be sure <strong>of</strong> this logic.)<br />

A neater—though unmechanistic—explanation is the same as that discussed in<br />

Section 6.5.2: we live long enough for our evolutionary niche, so evolution doesn’t care.<br />

This is certainly not the only example <strong>of</strong> an “obvious” imperfection (in longevity terms)<br />

that evolution has failed to correct: the nonspecificity <strong>of</strong> macrophages for oxidized LDL,<br />

mentioned in Section 5.1, is another. A third is cancer. Malignant tumours can progress<br />

beyond a very small size only by the generous co-operation <strong>of</strong> the body in providing an<br />

adequate blood supply, something which one might think it could easily deny. Indeed, some<br />

highly promising experimental cancer treatments involve inducing the body not to provide<br />

blood supply to tumours. 50a However, very recent work has shown that older animals have<br />

127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!