15.01.2013 Views

The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

120<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Mitochondrial</strong> <strong>Free</strong> <strong>Radical</strong> <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> <strong>Aging</strong><br />

mitochondria falls. This acts as a selective pressure against the mutants, because it is<br />

unidirectional: once a cell has no mutants, its descendants stay that way unless and until<br />

there is a new mutation event, whereas a cell that retains a few mutants can give rise at any<br />

future time to mutant-free descendants. See Section 10.7 for more about genetic drift.<br />

A difficulty with the above explanation is that genetic drift will only exert a significant<br />

pressure to eliminate mutant mtDNA once its copy number is very low, and the typical cell<br />

has a surplus <strong>of</strong> bioenergetic capacity, so the pressure due to intercellular competition may<br />

not get the number <strong>of</strong> mutant molecules low enough for drift to take over. A better<br />

explanation was provided recently: 14b that the necessarily slower protein import <strong>of</strong> mutant<br />

mitochondria, though probably irrelevant in non-dividing cells due to the time available<br />

(see Section 10.6), will select against the mutant mtDNA in dividing cells where SOS is<br />

absent.<br />

10.3.2. How Does mtDNA Survive in the Ovum Until Fertilization?<br />

This is harder—in fact, it is still a flourishing research topic. Since the ovum is a<br />

non-dividing cell until fertilization, it is potentially susceptible to SOS, and it has to avoid it<br />

for dozens <strong>of</strong> years. An age-related increase in oocyte mtDNA deletions has indeed been<br />

found. 14c<br />

Three explanations have been explored, and—unusually—they are probably all correct.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first is that ova are extremely quiescent until ovulation. 15 <strong>The</strong>y have almost no energy<br />

requirements. Thus they probably generate hardly any LECs, so their mitochondria probably<br />

have very little chance to mutate; also, if a mutation arose through replication error, it would<br />

be only very slowly amplified. This is probably sufficient to deal with the case <strong>of</strong> mutations<br />

that arise in the ovum, rather than being already present when it was formed, since those<br />

few mutant mitochondria would be so diluted out during early embryogenesis that they<br />

would be easy prey to replication disadvantage and genetic drift (see above).<br />

<strong>The</strong> second explanation deals with the opposite end <strong>of</strong> the spectrum: the case where a<br />

substantial proportion <strong>of</strong> the mtDNA in the ovum was mutant when it was formed. In such<br />

cases, SOS will ensure that there is no normal mtDNA left by the time <strong>of</strong> ovulation. A<br />

substantial burst <strong>of</strong> energy output on the part <strong>of</strong> the ovum is demanded during its ovulation<br />

and rapid early divisions, which is impossible without working mitochondria. If this<br />

energy is not forthcoming, subsequent cell division <strong>of</strong> that embryo fails, so no gestation will<br />

occur. <strong>The</strong> mother may have to wait another month, or have a litter one <strong>of</strong>fspring smaller,<br />

but that is cheap in evolutionary terms.<br />

What is really expensive in evolutionary terms is the third, intermediate situation:<br />

when there is some mutant mtDNA in the ovum at formation, but not quite so much that<br />

SOS can cause failure <strong>of</strong> early embryogenesis. That circumstance allows the possibility<br />

that the ovum would be fertilised, but that during embryogenesis a proportion <strong>of</strong> cells<br />

would retain enough mutant mitochondria that genetic drift would not eliminate them.<br />

This would mean that the embryo could develop normally, but its aging process would<br />

have a head start. Thus, the affected ovum would get all the biological investment needed<br />

to get it as far as birth and perhaps some way beyond, but it would not get far enough to<br />

have its own <strong>of</strong>fspring, so in evolutionary terms all that investment (<strong>of</strong> parental care, etc.)<br />

would have been wasted. This is a plausible explanation for the very rare occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />

sporadic (non-inherited) mtDNA-linked diseases such as Kearns-Sayre syndrome. 16<br />

It seems that evolution has found an extremely ingenious way to minimise the chance<br />

<strong>of</strong> this last scenario. 17 In the average cell there are at least 1000 mtDNA genomes, but in the<br />

ovum there are about 100,000. <strong>The</strong> simple way to get from 1000 to 100,000 is to engage in<br />

about seven rounds <strong>of</strong> mitochondrial replication; but that is not what happens. Instead, the<br />

mitochondrial population that is destined to inhabit the ovum is first depleted! It is forced

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!