The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging - Supernova: Pliki

pliki.supernova.com.pl
from pliki.supernova.com.pl More from this publisher
15.01.2013 Views

110 The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging Furthermore, the involvement of LDL (or other material transported in the blood) gives us a preliminary explanation for why the cells whose function is most affected by aging are not exactly the same ones as those whose mtDNA mutation load is highest. In particular, it is found that muscle fibers accumulate more mutant mtDNA than most other tissues, 38 but old muscle fibers can work just as well as young ones—the loss of strength associated with old age is almost entirely due to reduced exercise. 39 Similarly, the failure of young muscle to thrive when transplanted into old mice, and the converse success of old muscle transplanted into young mice, has been shown to derive from the old mice’s reduced ability to re-enervate the transplanted tissue, rather than from any reduced capability of the muscle fibers themselves. 40 A reasonable conclusion is that nervous tissue is the main victim of mtDNA-mediated oxidative damage, but muscle is the main toxin. 9.7. Alternative Pathways The pathway proposed in the previous section is quite complex, and is unlikely to be unique. It is therefore worthwhile to examine some possible variations. It is possible that some electron efflux from anaerobic cells is effected by a lactate/ pyruvate couple, rather than via the PMOR. However, there is evidence against an age-related increase of either lactate or pyruvate in plasma, 10 so this seems likely to play at most a minor role. On the other hand, it could be argued that the rise in lactate or pyruvate levels would be very slight and might be outweighed by secondary factors; therefore, a much better test would be to double-stain muscle tissue asking whether cytochrome c oxidase inactivity colocalises with hyperactivity of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), the enzyme that converts pyruvate to lactate. Histochemical quantification of LDH activity is routine, 41 so this is a relatively straightforward experiment. The next step is the transfer of electrons from the PMOR to oxygen, forming superoxide. It is possible that electrons might move directly from the PMOR to haemin, with no intermediate, or alternatively via some other intermediate. The involvement of some intermediate seems likely, because it serves as a reservoir which can be filled and tapped asynchronously; it thereby allows haemin-bound iron to receive electrons when at some distance from the anaerobic cell. This permits a greater throughput of electrons than if physical adjacency of the two were necessary. Oxygen was identified above as the likely major intermediate, since it is present in much greater amounts in plasma than any other plausible electron acceptor/donor; it has also been implicated in LDL oxidation, 42,43 though this is not certain. 44 There have been suggestions that ascorbate itself can act as a pro-oxidant electron donor, but this has been clearly shown not to be the case in physiological conditions. 45 The role of haemin as the supplier of iron is also probably not unique. I presented arguments above for why transferrin and ferritin are less prone to be involved, but this should not be construed as proof that they are not involved at all. Free iron and copper are hardly present in plasma, due to the activity of ceruloplasmin, 46 but may also play a minor part. Finally, LDL is not the only oxidisable substance imported by cells; they also import free* fatty acids from the plasma. This indeed constitutes the most important pathway of fatty acid import, since the amounts of phospholipid or cholesteryl ester imported in LDL are regulated only by the cell’s need for cholesterol. 47a But plasma contains a powerful enzymatic defense against the oxidation of free fatty acids: a selenium-dependent phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase, which reduces lipid hydroperoxides to alcohols, which cannot participate in chain reactions. 47b This means that the levels of free lipid hydroperoxides in plasma are extremely low, thus protecting cells from importing * Strictly, not free but bound to albumin until import. 46

The Search for How So Few Anaerobic Cells Cause So Much Oxidative Stress them. 48 This glutathione peroxidase can probably also act on phospholipids at the surface of LDL particles, 48 but, crucially, most of the oxidisable material in LDL is deep inside the particle and inaccessible to most antioxidants. (Lipid peroxidation must begin at the surface of the particle, but it will then rapidly undergo chain reactions and other molecular rearrangements that spread the damage into the cholesteryl ester core.) The protein component of LDL is also prone to undergo oxidation 49 —indeed, there is evidence that oxidation of that protein is the feature that the standard LDL receptor uses in order to avoid importing heavily oxidised LDL (see Section 4.3)—and protein hydroperoxides thus formed can stimulate further LEC production after import into cells, just like lipid hydroperoxides. 50 For these reasons, it seems quite probable that the particular pathway described earlier, via the PMOR, oxygen, haemin and LDL, is the primary route transferring oxidative stress from anaerobic cells to aerobic ones. Extensive evidence supporting this mechanism has since emerged. 51 9.7.1. Mechanical or Electrical Pathways The fact that muscle fibers become anaerobic in short segments allows a radically different mechanism for the propagation of oxidative stress to mitochondrially healthy regions. I do not think, on current evidence, that it is likely to be correct; however, the history of science is so littered with failures of such intuition that it would be remiss not to mention it. This caution is particularly germane in the context of mitochondria, since it was just such a failure of intuition that induced bioenergeticists to cling for so long to the belief in a chemical intermediate in OXPHOS (see Section 2.3.4). The function of a muscle fiber depends critically on two features which are properties of the fiber as a whole, rather than of each section of it independently. They are that it must be able to transmit both electrical potential and tensile force along its length. The electrical potential (the action potential) is necessary because it is the stimulus, starting from the motor neuron attached to the fiber, that induces each contractile unit of the fiber (termed a sarcomere) to contract. The tensile force is necessary because, ultimately, a muscle can only work if it pulls together the two things that are attached to its ends, and (like any chain) it is only as strong as its weakest link. Now: it is likely that an anaerobic segment of a muscle fiber undergoes many changes of cellular chemistry in order to adapt to the absence of OXPHOS. There will probably be changes to many fundamental aspects of the cytoplasm and the organelles, such as the NAD + /NADH ratio, the ubiquinone/ubiquinol ratio, and maybe even the pH. There is no known way in which such changes could affect the fiber’s conductivity—its ability to transmit the action potential—but the possibility cannot be absolutely discounted at this point. Similarly, the fiber’s tensile strength would not obviously be affected in an anaerobic region, since it derives from highly stable intracellular proteins which should be impervious to such changes, but again there may be vulnerabilities which we have not yet discovered. Let us then suppose, for a moment, that a muscle fiber does indeed suffer with regard to either its electrical or tensile integrity. What might that cause? The fiber is quite tightly attached to its neighbours, so tensile strength is shared; however, the attachments between fibers might be over-stressed in this situation and weaken. Consequently it is conceivable that quite large regions of mitochondrially healthy fibers suffer unusually large tensile forces as a result of small anaerobic segments nearby. This may have consequences for turnover of muscle protein; that, in turn, may conceivably contribute to oxidative stress. The gaps in this theory are clearly extremely large, but that is its only serious shortcoming; hence it would be premature to dismiss it out of hand at this stage. 111

<strong>The</strong> Search for How So Few Anaerobic Cells Cause So Much Oxidative Stress<br />

them. 48 This glutathione peroxidase can probably also act on phospholipids at the surface<br />

<strong>of</strong> LDL particles, 48 but, crucially, most <strong>of</strong> the oxidisable material in LDL is deep inside the<br />

particle and inaccessible to most antioxidants. (Lipid peroxidation must begin at the surface<br />

<strong>of</strong> the particle, but it will then rapidly undergo chain reactions and other molecular<br />

rearrangements that spread the damage into the cholesteryl ester core.) <strong>The</strong> protein<br />

component <strong>of</strong> LDL is also prone to undergo oxidation 49 —indeed, there is evidence that<br />

oxidation <strong>of</strong> that protein is the feature that the standard LDL receptor uses in order to avoid<br />

importing heavily oxidised LDL (see Section 4.3)—and protein hydroperoxides thus formed<br />

can stimulate further LEC production after import into cells, just like lipid hydroperoxides. 50<br />

For these reasons, it seems quite probable that the particular pathway described earlier,<br />

via the PMOR, oxygen, haemin and LDL, is the primary route transferring oxidative stress<br />

from anaerobic cells to aerobic ones. Extensive evidence supporting this mechanism has<br />

since emerged. 51<br />

9.7.1. Mechanical or Electrical Pathways<br />

<strong>The</strong> fact that muscle fibers become anaerobic in short segments allows a radically<br />

different mechanism for the propagation <strong>of</strong> oxidative stress to mitochondrially healthy<br />

regions. I do not think, on current evidence, that it is likely to be correct; however, the<br />

history <strong>of</strong> science is so littered with failures <strong>of</strong> such intuition that it would be remiss not to<br />

mention it. This caution is particularly germane in the context <strong>of</strong> mitochondria, since it was<br />

just such a failure <strong>of</strong> intuition that induced bioenergeticists to cling for so long to the belief<br />

in a chemical intermediate in OXPHOS (see Section 2.3.4).<br />

<strong>The</strong> function <strong>of</strong> a muscle fiber depends critically on two features which are properties<br />

<strong>of</strong> the fiber as a whole, rather than <strong>of</strong> each section <strong>of</strong> it independently. <strong>The</strong>y are that it must<br />

be able to transmit both electrical potential and tensile force along its length. <strong>The</strong> electrical<br />

potential (the action potential) is necessary because it is the stimulus, starting from the<br />

motor neuron attached to the fiber, that induces each contractile unit <strong>of</strong> the fiber (termed a<br />

sarcomere) to contract. <strong>The</strong> tensile force is necessary because, ultimately, a muscle can only<br />

work if it pulls together the two things that are attached to its ends, and (like any chain) it is<br />

only as strong as its weakest link.<br />

Now: it is likely that an anaerobic segment <strong>of</strong> a muscle fiber undergoes many changes<br />

<strong>of</strong> cellular chemistry in order to adapt to the absence <strong>of</strong> OXPHOS. <strong>The</strong>re will probably be<br />

changes to many fundamental aspects <strong>of</strong> the cytoplasm and the organelles, such as the<br />

NAD + /NADH ratio, the ubiquinone/ubiquinol ratio, and maybe even the pH. <strong>The</strong>re is no<br />

known way in which such changes could affect the fiber’s conductivity—its ability to transmit<br />

the action potential—but the possibility cannot be absolutely discounted at this point.<br />

Similarly, the fiber’s tensile strength would not obviously be affected in an anaerobic region,<br />

since it derives from highly stable intracellular proteins which should be impervious to such<br />

changes, but again there may be vulnerabilities which we have not yet discovered.<br />

Let us then suppose, for a moment, that a muscle fiber does indeed suffer with regard<br />

to either its electrical or tensile integrity. What might that cause? <strong>The</strong> fiber is quite tightly<br />

attached to its neighbours, so tensile strength is shared; however, the attachments between<br />

fibers might be over-stressed in this situation and weaken. Consequently it is conceivable<br />

that quite large regions <strong>of</strong> mitochondrially healthy fibers suffer unusually large tensile forces<br />

as a result <strong>of</strong> small anaerobic segments nearby. This may have consequences for turnover <strong>of</strong><br />

muscle protein; that, in turn, may conceivably contribute to oxidative stress. <strong>The</strong> gaps in<br />

this theory are clearly extremely large, but that is its only serious shortcoming; hence it<br />

would be premature to dismiss it out <strong>of</strong> hand at this stage.<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!