15.01.2013 Views

Simplicial Structures in Topology

Simplicial Structures in Topology

Simplicial Structures in Topology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

56 II <strong>Simplicial</strong> Complexes<br />

(not necessarily f<strong>in</strong>ite) and Φ is a set of nonempty, f<strong>in</strong>ite subsets of X satisfy<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g properties:<br />

1. (∀x ∈ X) , {x}∈Φ ,<br />

2. (∀σ ∈ Φ)(∀σ ′ ⊂ σ , σ ′ �= /0) , σ ′ ∈ Φ.<br />

The price we must pay is a strengthen<strong>in</strong>g of the topology of K. We keep the metric<br />

d : |K|×|K|−→R≥0<br />

�<br />

(∀p,q ∈|K|) d(p,q)= ∑ (p(x) − q(x))<br />

x∈X<br />

2<br />

which def<strong>in</strong>es a topology on K. While the necessary condition of Theorem (II.2.12)<br />

is still valid, the sufficient condition does not hold because, to prove it, we need<br />

the assumption that X is f<strong>in</strong>ite. However, it is precisely the topology of Theorem<br />

(II.2.12) that we impose on |K|; <strong>in</strong> other words, we must exchange the metric<br />

topology of K with a f<strong>in</strong>er topology. We say that<br />

F ⊂|K| is closed ⇐⇒ (∀σ ∈ Φ) F ∩|σ| is closed <strong>in</strong> σ .<br />

This topology is normally called “weak topology”; this is somehow a strange<br />

name, consider<strong>in</strong>g the fact that the weak topology for K is f<strong>in</strong>er (that is to say, has<br />

more open sets) than the metric topology.<br />

II.2.2 <strong>Simplicial</strong> Complexes and Immersions<br />

We have proved, aided by the geometric realization functor, that every abstract f<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

simplicial complex K can be immersed <strong>in</strong> an Euclidean space and hence can be<br />

viewed as an Euclidean simplicial complex. The dimension of the Euclidean space<br />

<strong>in</strong> question is equal to the number of vertices, say m, of the complex. At this po<strong>in</strong>t,<br />

we ask ourselves whether it is possible to immerse K <strong>in</strong> an Euclidean space of<br />

dimension lower than m. The next theorem answers that question. Before stat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

theorem, we def<strong>in</strong>e Euclidean simplicial complexes <strong>in</strong> a different (but equivalent)<br />

fashion. Let K ⊂ R n be a union of f<strong>in</strong>itely many Euclidean simplexes of R n such<br />

that<br />

1. If σ ⊂ K, every face of σ is <strong>in</strong> K.<br />

2. The <strong>in</strong>tersection of any two Euclidean simplexes of K is a face of both.<br />

It is not difficult to prove that a set of simplexes of R n verify<strong>in</strong>g the previous<br />

conditions is an Euclidean simplicial complex as def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Sect. II.1. We also notice<br />

that if F ⊂ K is closed, the <strong>in</strong>tersection F ∩σ is closed <strong>in</strong> σ for every Euclidean<br />

simplex σ of K; conversely,ifF is a subset of K such that, for every Euclidean<br />

simplex σ of K, F ∩ σ is closed <strong>in</strong> σ, thenF is closed <strong>in</strong> K because F is the f<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

union of the closed sets F ∩ σ. Clearly, an Euclidean complex K of R n is<br />

compact and closed <strong>in</strong> R n . We now state the immersion theorem for simplicial<br />

complexes.<br />

� 1 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!