Simplicial Structures in Topology
Simplicial Structures in Topology
Simplicial Structures in Topology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
I.2 Categories 35<br />
q: B ⊔C → B ⊔ f ,g C; f<strong>in</strong>ally, give B ⊔ f ,g C the quotient topology relative to the surjection<br />
q and def<strong>in</strong>e the maps<br />
The diagram<br />
f = qιC : C → B ⊔ f ,g C<br />
g = qιB : B → B ⊔ f ,g C.<br />
A<br />
��<br />
C<br />
g<br />
f<br />
f<br />
��<br />
B<br />
g<br />
��<br />
��<br />
B ⊔ f ,g C<br />
is commutative. Let h: B → X and k : C → X be two cont<strong>in</strong>uous functions such that<br />
hf = kg. We def<strong>in</strong>e the function ℓ: B⊔f,gC → X, by requir<strong>in</strong>g that ℓ(x)=h(x) if x ∈<br />
B � f (A), ℓ(x)=k(x) if x ∈ C � g(A),andℓ(x)=hf(a)=kg(a) for every x ∈ f (A)<br />
or x ∈ g(A). S<strong>in</strong>ce the restrictions of ℓq to B and C are cont<strong>in</strong>uous, the composite<br />
function ℓq is cont<strong>in</strong>uous; by the def<strong>in</strong>ition of quotient topology, we conclude that ℓ<br />
is cont<strong>in</strong>uous. It is easily proved that the map ℓ is unique. �<br />
By the universal property, the space B ⊔ f ,g C obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the pushout of ( f ,g) is<br />
unique up to homeomorphism.<br />
We have an important case when A is closed <strong>in</strong> C and g is the <strong>in</strong>clusion ι : A → C.<br />
We call the space B ⊔ f ,ι C <strong>in</strong> the pushout of ( f ,ι) the adjunction space of C to B<br />
via f .<br />
Let us now consider the category of groups. We first focus on some fundamental<br />
results <strong>in</strong> group theory. Let S beagivenset.Aword def<strong>in</strong>ed by the elements of S is<br />
a symbol<br />
ω = s ε1<br />
1 sε2<br />
2 ...sεn<br />
n ,<br />
where si ∈ S and εi = ±1; without exclud<strong>in</strong>g the case where two consecutive elements<br />
si are equal, we also request that the length n be f<strong>in</strong>ite; if n = 0, we say that ω<br />
is the empty word. LetWS be the set of all words def<strong>in</strong>ed by the elements of S. More<br />
specifically, given a set S, consider the set S ⊔ S −1 whose elements are all elements<br />
of S and all elements of a copy of S, denoted S −1 .Thewords of WS of length n are<br />
precisely all n-tuples of elements of S ⊔ S −1 .<br />
We now def<strong>in</strong>e an equivalence relation E <strong>in</strong> WS: w1Ew2 if w2 is obta<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />
w1 through a f<strong>in</strong>ite sequence of operations as follows:<br />
1. Replac<strong>in</strong>g the word s ε1<br />
1 sε2<br />
2 ...sεn n by the word s ε1<br />
1 ...sε k<br />
k aa−1 ...sεn n ,ortheword<br />
s ε1<br />
1 ...sε k<br />
k a−1a...sεn n ;<br />
2. Replac<strong>in</strong>g the words s ε1<br />
1 ...sε k<br />
k aa−1 ...sεn n or s ε1<br />
1 ...sε k<br />
k a−1a...sεn n by the word<br />
s ε1<br />
1 sε2<br />
2 ...sεn n ,