15.01.2013 Views

Simplicial Structures in Topology

Simplicial Structures in Topology

Simplicial Structures in Topology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I.1 <strong>Topology</strong> 23<br />

(I.1.38) Lemma. Let X and Y be topological spaces where X is compact 3<br />

Hausdorff. Then the function<br />

ε : X × M(X,Y) → Y<br />

(evaluation function), def<strong>in</strong>ed by ε(x, f )= f (x) for every x ∈ X and every f ∈<br />

M(X,Y ), is cont<strong>in</strong>uous.<br />

Proof. Take arbitrarily (x, f ) ∈ X × M(X,Y ) andanopensetU ⊂ Y with f (x) ∈ U.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce X is compact Hausdorff and f −1 (U) is open <strong>in</strong> X, there exists an open set V<br />

of X such that<br />

x ∈ V ⊂ V ⊂ f −1 (U)<br />

where V is compact (see Corollary (I.1.35)). We end the proof by not<strong>in</strong>g that (x, f ) ∈<br />

V ×W V,U and ε(V ×W V,U ) ⊂ U. �<br />

(I.1.39) Theorem. Let X be a compact Hausdorff space; then, if ˆf : Z → M(X,Y )<br />

is cont<strong>in</strong>uous, so is f : X × Z → Y.<br />

Proof. It is enough to note that f is the composite of<br />

1X × ˆf : X × Z → X × M(X,Y) and ε : X × M(X,Y) → Y<br />

and apply Lemma (I.1.38). �<br />

(I.1.40) Corollary. Let q: X −→ Y be a quotient map. If Z is a compact Hausdorff<br />

space, then also<br />

q × 1Z : X × Z −→ Y × Z<br />

is a quotient map.<br />

Proof. The quotient map q: X → Y has the follow<strong>in</strong>g property which characterizes<br />

the quotient topology on Y : a function g: Y → W is cont<strong>in</strong>uous if and only<br />

if gq: X → W is cont<strong>in</strong>uous (see Exercise 7 at the end of this section). We must<br />

therefore prove that, for every topological space W and every g: Y × Z → W , g<br />

is cont<strong>in</strong>uous if and only if h = g(q × 1Z) is cont<strong>in</strong>uous: If g is cont<strong>in</strong>uous, h is<br />

undoubtedly cont<strong>in</strong>uous. Now, the follow<strong>in</strong>g commutative diagram<br />

h<br />

X × Z ��<br />

��<br />

W<br />

��<br />

��<br />

q × 1Z ��<br />

��<br />

��<br />

g<br />

��<br />

��<br />

Y × Z<br />

3 Actually it is not necessary to ask that X be compact; <strong>in</strong> fact, it is sufficient to request that X be<br />

locally compact, that is to say, that every po<strong>in</strong>t of X has a compact neighbourhood.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!