15.01.2013 Views

Simplicial Structures in Topology

Simplicial Structures in Topology

Simplicial Structures in Topology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20 I Fundamental Concepts<br />

We wish to prove that f is constant on every open set of U. Indeed, let U ∈ U and<br />

x ∈ U be given and suppose that f (x)=0; then [0,x] is covered by a f<strong>in</strong>ite subcover<strong>in</strong>g<br />

V ⊂ U. But for every y ∈ U, the <strong>in</strong>terval [0,y] is covered by a f<strong>in</strong>ite family<br />

of open <strong>in</strong>tervals of U (that is to say, by V ∪{U}) mean<strong>in</strong>g thereby that f (y)=0.<br />

This shows that f equals either 0 or 1 on the entire open <strong>in</strong>terval U. It follows that<br />

f is cont<strong>in</strong>uous; moreover, s<strong>in</strong>ce I =[0,1] is connected, by Theorem (I.1.12), f is<br />

constant; s<strong>in</strong>ce f (0)=0, we have f (1)=0, <strong>in</strong> other words, I is covered by a f<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

subcover<strong>in</strong>g of U. �<br />

We note that, s<strong>in</strong>ce every closed <strong>in</strong>terval [a,b] where a < b (bounded) is homeomorphic<br />

to the unit <strong>in</strong>terval [0,1], every bounded and closed <strong>in</strong>terval of R is compact.<br />

We wish to prove that a f<strong>in</strong>ite product of compact spaces is a compact space;<br />

this result is an immediate consequence of the follow<strong>in</strong>g theorem:<br />

(I.1.31) Theorem. Let B and C be compact subspaces of the topological spaces X<br />

and Y, respectively, and let U = {A j | j ∈ J} be an open cover<strong>in</strong>g of B × C. Then<br />

there are two open sets U ⊂ X and V ⊂ Y such that<br />

B ×C ⊂ U ×V ⊂ X ×Y<br />

and U ×V is covered by a f<strong>in</strong>ite number of elements of U.<br />

Proof. The method for prov<strong>in</strong>g this theorem is the one used <strong>in</strong> Theorem (I.1.29) to<br />

show the existence of two open sets U and V which conta<strong>in</strong> f −1 (y1) and f −1 (y2),<br />

respectively. We leave to the reader the task of supply<strong>in</strong>g the details needed for this<br />

proof. �<br />

(I.1.32) Corollary. Let X1,...,Xn be compact spaces; then X1 ×...×Xn is compact.<br />

Proof. If n = 2 we have the previous theorem where B = X = X1 and C = Y = X2;<br />

thereafter, we proceed by <strong>in</strong>duction. �<br />

(I.1.33) Corollary. Let B and C be compact subspaces of the topological spaces X<br />

and Y respectively. Let W be open <strong>in</strong> X ×Y such that B ×C ⊂ W . Then there are<br />

open sets U ⊂ X and V ⊂ Y such that<br />

B ×C ⊂ U ×V ⊂ W.<br />

Proof. It is enough to set U = {W} <strong>in</strong> Theorem (I.1.31). �<br />

(I.1.34) Corollary. Let X be a Hausdorff space and let B and C be disjo<strong>in</strong>t compact<br />

subspaces of X. Then there are two disjo<strong>in</strong>t open sets U and V of X with B ⊂ U and<br />

C ⊂ V.<br />

Proof. We beg<strong>in</strong> by not<strong>in</strong>g that if<br />

ΔX = {(x,x) ∈ X × X}

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!