15.01.2013 Views

Simplicial Structures in Topology

Simplicial Structures in Topology

Simplicial Structures in Topology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I.1 <strong>Topology</strong> 13<br />

Cx = �<br />

Xj<br />

j∈J<br />

is a connected space that conta<strong>in</strong>s x, known as a connected component of x. The<br />

space Cx is maximal <strong>in</strong> the sense that if a subset M ⊂ X is connected and conta<strong>in</strong>s Cx,<br />

then Cx = M (<strong>in</strong> other words, the connected component Cx is the largest connected<br />

subspace that conta<strong>in</strong>s x). Moreover, Cx is a closed subspace of X; <strong>in</strong> fact, by<br />

Theorem (I.1.18), Cx is connected and s<strong>in</strong>ce Cx ⊂ Cx, thenCx = Cx. The connected<br />

components of two po<strong>in</strong>ts x,y ∈ X are either disjo<strong>in</strong>t or co<strong>in</strong>cide: <strong>in</strong> fact, if z ∈<br />

Cx ∩Cy, the subspace Cx ∪Cy is a connected subspace of X that conta<strong>in</strong>s both spaces<br />

Cx and Cy; but the connected components are maximal and so Cx = Cx ∪Cy = Cy.<br />

From this fact, we conclude that the relation “x,y ∈ X are <strong>in</strong> the same connected<br />

component” is an equivalence relation. Therefore, a topological space X is a disjo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

union of maximal, closed, connected subspaces. A space is connected if and only if<br />

it has only one connected component.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, we note that two topological spaces with different numbers of connected<br />

components cannot be homeomorphic. This is another criterion for verify<strong>in</strong>g<br />

whether two spaces are homeomorphic.<br />

There is another type of connectedness, called path-connectedness. Apath <strong>in</strong> a<br />

topological space X is a map f : [0,1] −→ X; two po<strong>in</strong>ts x0,x1 ∈ X are jo<strong>in</strong>ed by a<br />

path if there is path f of X such that f (0)=x0 and f (1)=x1. We say that a space<br />

X is path-connected if and only if any two po<strong>in</strong>ts x0,x1 ∈ X maybejo<strong>in</strong>edbyapath<br />

<strong>in</strong> X.<br />

The results of Theorem (I.1.13) hold true for path-connectedness; as a matter of<br />

completion (and to follow the preced<strong>in</strong>g model), we present these results as a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

theorem.<br />

(I.1.20) Theorem. The follow<strong>in</strong>g statements are true:<br />

1. Let f : X → Y be a cont<strong>in</strong>uous function, where X is path-connected; then the<br />

space f (X) is path-connected.<br />

2. Let {Xj | j ∈ J} be a set of path-connected subspaces of a space Y , with<br />

�<br />

j Xj �= /0;thenX= �<br />

j Xj is a path-connected space.<br />

3. If X and Y are path-connected, then X ×Y is path-connected.<br />

Proof. 1. Given any two po<strong>in</strong>ts y0,y1 of f (X), we choose x0,x1 ∈ X such that y0 =<br />

f (x0) and y1 = f (x1). Because X is path-connected, there is a path g: [0,1] → X<br />

such that g(0)=x0 and g(1)=x1. So,thepathfg: [0,1] → f (X) l<strong>in</strong>ks y0 to y1 and<br />

f (X) is, therefore, path-connected.<br />

In particular, if a space X is path-connected, any space Y homeomorphic to X is<br />

path-connected.<br />

2. Given any two po<strong>in</strong>ts x0,x1 ∈ X, suppose that x0 ∈ Xi 0 and x1 ∈ Xi 1 ;leta ∈<br />

Xi 0 ∩ Xi 1 . By the hypothesis, there are two cont<strong>in</strong>uous functions<br />

f0 : [0,1] → Xi0 , f0(0)=x0 , f0(1)=a,<br />

f1 : [0,1] → Xi1 , f1(0)=x1 , f1(1)=a.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!