15.01.2013 Views

Simplicial Structures in Topology

Simplicial Structures in Topology

Simplicial Structures in Topology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12 I Fundamental Concepts<br />

In particular, the real l<strong>in</strong>e R is connected.<br />

The previous theorem has a converse:<br />

(I.1.15) Theorem. Any connected subspace of R is an <strong>in</strong>terval.<br />

Proof. If X ⊂ R is not an <strong>in</strong>terval, we can f<strong>in</strong>d real numbers a,b ∈ X and c �∈ X such<br />

that a < c < b. In this case,<br />

U =(−∞,c) ∩ X and V = X ∩ (c,+∞)<br />

are non-empty (a ∈ U and b ∈ V), open <strong>in</strong> X, disjo<strong>in</strong>t, and such that X = U ∪ V.<br />

Then X is not connected, contradict<strong>in</strong>g the hypothesis. �<br />

The last two theorems have an immediate and <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g consequence:<br />

(I.1.16) Corollary. Let X be a connected space and f : X → R be a map. Then<br />

f (X) is an <strong>in</strong>terval.<br />

(I.1.17) Remark. The concept of connectedness provides a simple method for establish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

when two spaces are homeomorphic. The criterion goes as follows: suppose<br />

that f : X → Y is a homeomorphism; then, for every x ∈ X, the restriction of f<br />

to X � {x} is a homeomorphism from X � {x} onto Y � { f (x)}; therefore, X � {x}<br />

is connected if and only if Y � { f (x)} is connected.<br />

So, how does this method work? We wish to prove, for <strong>in</strong>stance, that a semi-open<br />

<strong>in</strong>terval (a,b] cannot be homeomorphic to an open <strong>in</strong>terval (c,d). Suppose that a<br />

homeomorphism f : (a,b] → (c,d) could exist; then, we would have a homeomorphism<br />

(a,b)=(a,b] � {b} ∼ = (c,d) � { f (b)}<br />

which is impossible, for the first space is connected (it is an <strong>in</strong>terval), but the second<br />

is not!<br />

Here is an useful result.<br />

(I.1.18) Theorem. Let X be a topological space and A one of its subspaces such<br />

that its closure <strong>in</strong> X co<strong>in</strong>cides with X. Then, if A is connected, so is X.<br />

Proof. Let f : X →{0,1} be a two-valued map of X. Its restriction f |A is a twovalued<br />

map of A and, s<strong>in</strong>ce A is connected, f |A is constant; we may suppose that<br />

f |A = 0 with no loss <strong>in</strong> generality. On the other hand, s<strong>in</strong>ce A = X and f is cont<strong>in</strong>uous,<br />

we have<br />

f (A) ⊂ f (A)={0} = {0}<br />

and so f is constant <strong>in</strong> X. Therefore, X is connected. �<br />

(I.1.19) Remark. Let X be a topological space and x be one of its po<strong>in</strong>ts; let<br />

{Xj, j ∈ J} be the set of all connected subspaces of X which conta<strong>in</strong> x; then, by<br />

Theorem (I.1.13) (part 2), the union

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!