15.01.2013 Views

Simplicial Structures in Topology

Simplicial Structures in Topology

Simplicial Structures in Topology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

186 V Triangulable Manifolds<br />

we take the cyl<strong>in</strong>der that gives rise to K and glue it to M <strong>in</strong> such a manner that the<br />

circles that bound the cyl<strong>in</strong>der are glued <strong>in</strong> opposite directions (one clockwise, the<br />

other anticlockwise, as seen <strong>in</strong> Fig. V.14). Now, the spaces obta<strong>in</strong>ed by the addition<br />

of a cyl<strong>in</strong>der to M by these two procedures are homeomorphic to each other.<br />

(V.2.5) Theorem. Any closed surface is homeomorphic to one of the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

surfaces:<br />

(i) S 2<br />

(ii) nT := T 2 #...#T 2 (n times)<br />

(iii) nRP 2 := RP 2 #...#RP 2 (n times)<br />

Proof. Let S be a surface and K one of its triangulations. The complex K has<br />

a f<strong>in</strong>ite number of vertices, 1-simplexes, and 2-simplexes; for simplicity of notation,<br />

we denote by Ti (respectively, ℓi) the geometric realizations of the 2-simplexes<br />

(respectively, the 1-simplexes) of K; these are called triangles and sides. Let us go<br />

through some prelim<strong>in</strong>ary considerations.<br />

We beg<strong>in</strong> by observ<strong>in</strong>g that each side of |K| is only a side of two triangles (see<br />

Theorem (V.1.5)). Now, let v be a vertex of K; then the triangles with the vertex v<br />

may be arranged <strong>in</strong> cyclic order T1,T2,...,Tr = T0 so that for each i ∈{1,...,r},the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tersection Ti−1 ∩ Ti is the side ℓi. In fact, we note that, if there were two such sets<br />

of triangles around v, they would have only the po<strong>in</strong>t v <strong>in</strong> common; therefore, by<br />

remov<strong>in</strong>g v from their union, we would have a non-connected space; on the other<br />

hand, s<strong>in</strong>ce S is a surface, there would be an open set U ⊂ S that would conta<strong>in</strong> v<br />

and be homeomorphic to an open disk of R 2 ; hence U � v would be connected, a<br />

contradiction. It follows that the neighbourhood of every simple cycle of sides <strong>in</strong><br />

|K| is homeomorphic to the cyl<strong>in</strong>der I × S 1 or the Möbius band.<br />

We now consider the one-dimensional simplicial complex G (namely, the graph)<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed as follows: the vertices of G are all triangles of K, and for each pair of<br />

adjacent triangles (that is to say, with one side <strong>in</strong> common) T1 and T2 of K, we<br />

add the 1-simplex {T1,T2} to G. ThecomplexG may be embedded <strong>in</strong> S ∼ = |K| by<br />

send<strong>in</strong>g the triangle Ti (viewed as a vertex of G) to its barycentre b(Ti) (viewed as a<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t of |K|). Through a barycentric subdivision of K, the 1-simplexes of G will be<br />

represented by a broken l<strong>in</strong>e that jo<strong>in</strong>s the two barycentres and crosses the common<br />

side of T1 and T2.<br />

We now recall the concept of spann<strong>in</strong>g tree (or maximal tree). A tree of |K| is<br />

a contractible unidimensional subpolyhedron |L| ⊂|K|; the existence of trees <strong>in</strong> a<br />

polyhedron |K| is assured by the fact that the geometric realization of any 1-simplex<br />

of K, be<strong>in</strong>g homeomorphic to the disk D 1 , is contractible. The trees of a complex<br />

are partially ordered by <strong>in</strong>clusion; a tree is called spann<strong>in</strong>g if it is not conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> a<br />

tree strictly larger; s<strong>in</strong>ce K is f<strong>in</strong>ite, the existence of a spann<strong>in</strong>g tree is also certa<strong>in</strong>.<br />

(V.2.6) Lemma. If |K| is path-connected and |L| is a spann<strong>in</strong>g tree, then L conta<strong>in</strong>s<br />

all vertices of K.<br />

Proof. We suppose a to be a vertex of K but not of L. Let us take any vertex b of<br />

L; s<strong>in</strong>ce|K| is path-connected, there is a path γ : I →|K| jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a and b. Bythe

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!