Simplicial Structures in Topology
Simplicial Structures in Topology
Simplicial Structures in Topology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
V.1 Topological Manifolds 175<br />
|Ki| = | •<br />
τ i n| � Int|σ n−1|<br />
(remember that •<br />
τi n is the boundary of τi n – see def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>in</strong> Sect. II.2).<br />
We note that for each p ∈ Int|σ n−1|, the space S(p) is written as the union<br />
S(p) = �r i=1 |Ki|; besides, |Ki|∩|Kj| = | •<br />
σn−1| for each pair of dist<strong>in</strong>ct exponents<br />
(i, j) with i, j ∈{1,2,...,n}. By apply<strong>in</strong>g the Mayer–Vietoris sequence to the pair<br />
(|K1|,|K2|), we obta<strong>in</strong><br />
Hn−1(|K1|∪|K2|;Z) ∼ = Hn−2(| •<br />
σn−1|;Z) ∼ = Z<br />
(note that | •<br />
σn−1| ∼ = Sn−2 ); we next apply the Mayer–Vietoris sequence to the pair<br />
(|K1|∪|K2|,|K3|) and so on, to get the free group with r − 1 generators<br />
� �<br />
r�<br />
Hn−1<br />
|Ki|;Z<br />
i=1<br />
however,<br />
� �<br />
r�<br />
Hn−1 |Ki|;Z ∼= Hn−1(S(p);Z)<br />
i=1<br />
∼ = Z<br />
and so, r − 1 = 1, that is to say, r = 2.<br />
We now assume that |K| is connected. Then by Lemma (II.4.4), K is connected,<br />
<strong>in</strong> the mean<strong>in</strong>g of the def<strong>in</strong>ition given <strong>in</strong> Sect. II.4 (from the topological po<strong>in</strong>t of<br />
view, |K| is connected if and only if it is path-connected).<br />
Let σn ∈ Φ be any n-simplex. We view the simplicial complex K as the union<br />
of two subcomplexes: (a) the simplicial complex L def<strong>in</strong>ed by all n-simplexes of K<br />
(and their subsimplexes) that may be l<strong>in</strong>ked to σn by a sequence of n-simplexes as<br />
mentioned <strong>in</strong> 3; (b) the simplicial complex M of all n-simplexes of K for which this<br />
condition does not hold. Note that K = L ∪ M. If M = /0, the assertion is proved;<br />
this occurs when dim|K| = 1 because K is connected; <strong>in</strong>cidentally note that s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
K is connected L ∩ M �= /0. We now consider M nonempty and dim|K|≥2. Then,<br />
dim(L ∩ M) ≤ n − 2; <strong>in</strong> fact, if σn−1 were an (n − 1)-simplex of both L and M,<br />
σn−1 would be a face of both an n-simplex of L and an n-simplex of M, whichis<br />
impossible because of the def<strong>in</strong>itions. For any vertex x of L ∩ M,<br />
dim(S(x) ∩ L)=dim(S(x) ∩ M)=n − 1<br />
and dim(S(x) ∩ L ∩ M) ≤ n − 3. However, because of 2., every(n − 2)-simplex<br />
of S(x) is a face shared by two (n − 1)-simplexes; thus if (S(x) ∩ L)n−1 and<br />
(S(x) ∩ M)n−1 are the sets of all (n − 1)-simplexes of S(x) ∩ L and S(x) ∩ M,<br />
respectively, the cha<strong>in</strong>s<br />
cL = ∑<br />
τ∈(S(x)∩L) n−1<br />
τ ,<br />
cM = ∑ τ<br />
τ∈(S(x)∩M)n−1<br />
;