Simplicial Structures in Topology
Simplicial Structures in Topology
Simplicial Structures in Topology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
172 V Triangulable Manifolds<br />
(V.1.2) Lemma. The Cartesian product of an n-manifold X by an m-manifold Y is<br />
an (n + m)-manifold.<br />
Proof. For any (x,y) ∈ X ×Y, we choose two charts (U,φ) and (V,ψ) of x ∈ X and<br />
y ∈ Y , respectively; we note that (U ×V,φ × ψ) is a chart of the Cartesian product<br />
of the manifolds: <strong>in</strong> fact, φ(U) × ψ(V) is an (elementary) open set of R n × R m ∼ =<br />
R n+m . �<br />
We now give some examples. It is easily proved that, for every n > 0, the Euclidean<br />
space R n is an n-manifold. The circle S 1 ⊂ R, with the topology <strong>in</strong>duced<br />
by the Euclidean topology of R, is a 1-manifold; this is readily proved. The sphere<br />
S 2 with the topology <strong>in</strong>duced by R 3 is a 2-manifold (or surface): <strong>in</strong> fact, S 2 is<br />
Hausdorff and its atlas is the set<br />
A = {(S 2 � {−x},φx) | x ∈ S 2 }<br />
where φx is the stereographic projection of S2 �{−x} from the po<strong>in</strong>t −x on the plane<br />
Tx tangent to S2 at x. A similar result holds also for hyperspheres Sn , n > 2.<br />
An immediate consequence from Lemma (V.1.2) is that the torus T 2 = S1 × S1 is a 2-manifold.<br />
To prove that the real projective space RPn is an n-manifold, we use the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
theorem.<br />
(V.1.3) Theorem. Let X be a compact n-manifold and let G be a f<strong>in</strong>ite topological<br />
group freely act<strong>in</strong>g on X. Then, the quotient space X/G is an n-manifold.<br />
Proof. Let G be the f<strong>in</strong>ite group whose elements are g1 = 1G, g2,...,gp; then, the<br />
orbit of any element x ∈ X consists <strong>in</strong> p (dist<strong>in</strong>ct) elements x = xg1,xg2,...,xgp.<br />
For each pair (x,xgi), i = 2,...,p,wetakeapair(Ui,Vi) of open sets of X such that<br />
x ∈ Ui, xgi ∈ Vi and Ui ∩Vi = /0.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce Vi conta<strong>in</strong>s xgi, Vig −1<br />
i surely conta<strong>in</strong>s x; therefore, the set<br />
U =<br />
p�<br />
i=2<br />
�<br />
Ui ∩Vig −1<br />
�<br />
i<br />
is an open set of X conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g x, is disjo<strong>in</strong>t from all open sets Vi, i = 2,...,p and,<br />
consequently, from all Ugi, i = 2,...,p (because<br />
Ugi ⊂ � Ui ∩Vig −1�<br />
i gi ⊂ Vig −1<br />
i gi = Vi<br />
and Vi ∩U = /0 for each i = 2,...,p). The restriction to U of the canonical epimorphism<br />
q: X → X/G,thatistosay,<br />
q|U : U → q(U) ⊂ X/G