15.01.2013 Views

Simplicial Structures in Topology

Simplicial Structures in Topology

Simplicial Structures in Topology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

III.3 Some Applications 121<br />

has no fixed po<strong>in</strong>ts and so Λ( f )=0; but f is homotopic to the identity 1 S 1 through<br />

H(e 2πit ,s)=e 2πi(t+s 1 12 )<br />

and therefore Λ(1 S 1)=0 (because the Lefschetz Number is <strong>in</strong>variant up to homotopy);<br />

however, 1 S 1 has only fixed po<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

We now consider an important corollary to the Lefschetz Fixed Po<strong>in</strong>t Theorem,<br />

known as the Brouwer Fixed Po<strong>in</strong>t Theorem. Aself-map of a space X is a map of<br />

X <strong>in</strong>to itself.<br />

(III.3.4) Corollary. Every nonconstant self-map of a connected acyclic polyhedron<br />

has a fixed po<strong>in</strong>t.<br />

Proof. Let |K| be such a polyhedron 3 ; by hypothesis, the homology of |K| is all<br />

trivial, except for H0(K;Q) ∼ = Q. Let us suppose that f is simplicially approximated<br />

by g: K (r) → K. Letx0 be a vertex of |K| and let us suppose that {x0} + B0(K,Q)<br />

is a generator of H0(K,Q). On the other hand,<br />

C0(g)ℵ0({x0})=g(x0)<br />

and g(x0) is a vertex of K because g is simplicial. S<strong>in</strong>ce |K| is connected, g(x0)<br />

is homological to {x0} and therefore Λ( f )=1. Lefschetz theorem allows us to<br />

conclude that f must have a fixed po<strong>in</strong>t. �<br />

Before stat<strong>in</strong>g the next corollary, let us look <strong>in</strong>to the def<strong>in</strong>ition of the degree of<br />

a self-map of a sphere. It is easy to see that the n-sphere S n (n ≥ 1) is the geometric<br />

realization of a simplicial complex Σ n .Letf : S n → S n be a given map and<br />

g: (Σ n ) (r) → Σ n be a simplicial approximation of f . Σ n has trivial homology <strong>in</strong> all<br />

dimensions except for 0 and n, when it is isomorphic to the Abelian group Z. We<br />

recall that Hn((Σ n ) (r) ) ∼ = Zn((Σ n ) (r) ) has only two possible generators (differ<strong>in</strong>g by<br />

their orientation); let z be one of them. Then, there exists an <strong>in</strong>teger d such that<br />

Hn(g)(z)=dz. This number, which is obviously <strong>in</strong>dependent from the homotopy<br />

class of the map f ,thecyclez, and the simplicial approximation g of f ,isthedegree<br />

of f (notation: gr ( f )). 4<br />

(III.3.5) Lemma. For every map f : S n → S n ,<br />

Λ( f )=1 +(−1) n gr ( f ) .<br />

Proof. The Lefschetz number is def<strong>in</strong>ed for the homology with rational coefficients.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce Σ n is connected, Tr H0( f ,Q)=1; we only need to prove that Tr Hn( f ,Q)=<br />

gr ( f ), to which end it is sufficient not<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

Zn((Σ n ) (r) ,Q) ∼ = Zn((Σ n ) (r) ) ⊗ Q . �<br />

3 See examples of acyclic complexes <strong>in</strong> Sect. II.4.<br />

4 Case n = 1 is particularly <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g: when we move along the cycle z, its image g(z) wraps the<br />

correspond<strong>in</strong>g generat<strong>in</strong>g cycle of Z1(S 1 ) d times around S 1 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!