Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 – Rome, 13-15 December 2010 Image Formation/Displacement and Field Tunneling in Metamaterial Transformation Slabs Ilaria Gallina (1) , Giuseppe Castal<strong>di</strong> (1) , Vincenzo Gal<strong>di</strong> (1) , Andrea Alù (2) , and Nader Engheta (3) (1) University of Sannio, Department of Engineering Benevento, Italy – E-mail: ilaria.gallina@unisannio.it, castal<strong>di</strong>@unisannio.it, vgal<strong>di</strong>@unisannio.it (2) The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Austin, TX 78712, USA – E-mail: alu@mail.utexas.edu (3) University of Pennsylvania, Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA – E-mail: engheta@ee.upenn.edu Transformation optics has recently emerged as one of the most interesting and promising approaches to the synthesis of metamaterials for electromagneticfield manipulation (see, e.g., [1]). In this work, we review and summarize some recent results [2,3] on the electromagnetic properties of certain general classes of metamaterial slabs, inspired by transformation optics, that exploit their intrinsic anisotropy and inhomogeneity to achieve exotic material properties, within double-positive, double-negative or single-negative constitutive parameters. In particular, by means of analytical and numerical full-wave stu<strong>di</strong>es, we derive some con<strong>di</strong>tions for total transmission, which generalize some previous results in the literature, and explore the image <strong>di</strong>splacement/formation properties, of interest for applications such as anti-reflection radomes, anti-cloaking, and lensing/focusing. Our results confirm the broad breadth of transformation optics and its intriguing potentials as a general unifying approach to the design of application-oriented metamaterials. In particular, we systematically derive the con<strong>di</strong>tions for designs that do not require negative constitutive parameters, but that exploit the inherent anisotropy of the transformation slabs to achieve the required field-manipulation effects within the double-positive (possibly nonmagnetic) regime of operation. References [1] J. B. Pendry, D. Schurig, and D. R. Smith, “Controlling electromagnetic fields,” Science, 312, 1780-1782, 2006 [2] I. Gallina, G. Castal<strong>di</strong>, V. Gal<strong>di</strong>, A. Alù, and N. Engheta, “General class of metamaterial transformation slabs,” Phys. Rev. B, 81, 125124, 2010 [3] G. Castal<strong>di</strong>, I. Gallina, V. Gal<strong>di</strong>, A. Alù, and N. Engheta, “Transformation-optics generalization of tunnelling effects in bi-layers made of paired pseudo-epsilonnegative/mu-negative me<strong>di</strong>a,” to be published in J. Opt. (Special Issue on Transformation Optics), 2011 24
Session FEM-1 Magnetic device modeling Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 – Rome, 13-15 December 2010 Chairperson: A. Salvini, “Roma Tre” University 14:00-14:40 Invited paper – N. Takahashi Application of ON/OFF method to new conceptual design of magnetic devices 14:40-15:00 C. Ragusa, B. Montrucchio, V. Giovara, F. Khan, O. Khan, M. Repetto, and B. Xie Implementation of a 3D micromagnetic code on a parallel and <strong>di</strong>stributed architecture 15:00-15:20 S. Coco, A. Laudani, F. Riganti Fulginei, A. Salvini Neural-FEM approach for the analysis of hysteretic materials in unbounded domain 25
- Page 1 and 2: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 3 and 4: Meta 2010 - Committees Chairmen Met
- Page 5 and 6: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 7 and 8: Meta 2010 Foreword Ladies and Gentl
- Page 9 and 10: FEM 2010 Foreword Ladies and Gentle
- Page 11 and 12: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 13 and 14: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 15 and 16: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 17 and 18: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 19 and 20: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 21 and 22: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 23: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 27 and 28: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 29 and 30: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 31 and 32: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 33 and 34: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 35 and 36: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 37 and 38: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 39 and 40: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 41 and 42: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 43 and 44: Session FEM-3 Methods and solvers M
- Page 45 and 46: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 47 and 48: Session FEM-4 Design and applicatio
- Page 49 and 50: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 51 and 52: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 53 and 54: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 55 and 56: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 57 and 58: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 59 and 60: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 61 and 62: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 63 and 64: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 65 and 66: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15
- Page 67 and 68: Author Index Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 -
- Page 69 and 70: Meta 2010 & FEM 2010 - Rome, 13-15