14.01.2013 Views

Analytical Chemistry Chemical Cytometry Quantitates Superoxide

Analytical Chemistry Chemical Cytometry Quantitates Superoxide

Analytical Chemistry Chemical Cytometry Quantitates Superoxide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of which was constant for all amplicons analyzed in this<br />

experiment, did not show any significant trend, suggesting<br />

approximately constant yields of the PCR products obtained<br />

for any dGTP/dG*TP ratio after the 30 PCR cycles (which was<br />

also confirmed by UV-vis spectrophotometry, not shown).<br />

Dependences of the heights of peak Gox (yielded by the<br />

unmodified 347-bp PCR product) and peak G* ox (yielded by<br />

the same DNA fragment amplified with 100% of dG*TP) on<br />

concentrations of the amplicons followed similar trends (Figure<br />

4A), showing approximately linear regions below 10 µgmL-1and sublinear trends, suggesting saturation of the electrode surface,<br />

at higher DNA concentrations. The lowest detectable DNA<br />

concentrations were around 1 µg mL-1 in both cases. Electrochemical<br />

determination of the modified and unmodified 347bp<br />

amplicons was compared to other commonly used techniques,<br />

based on gel electrophoresis followed by DNA staining<br />

(Figure 4B). The amplicons were separated in native 5% polyacrylamide<br />

gel (1 µL of the reaction mixture, containing about 30<br />

µg mL-1 Figure 2. Electrochemical responses of a PCR-amplified 347-bp<br />

DNA fragment modified with 7-deazapurines. (A) Scheme of the PCR.<br />

Primers at the 5′-ends of both strands of the PCR product (black)<br />

contain only standard nucleobases, regardless of the dNTP composition.<br />

The synthesized stretches contain modified nucleobases depending<br />

on the dNTP mix. (B) Baseline-corrected voltammograms<br />

obtained for DNA fragment resulting from PCR in the presence of<br />

standard dNTP mix (black), for a mix with G* instead of G (red) and<br />

for a mix with A* instead of A (blue). The PCR was conducted in 30<br />

cycles and the products were purified using Qiagen PCR Purification<br />

Kit. Dotted curve corresponds to control PCR mixture (with G*+A)<br />

which was not subjected to thermal cycling.<br />

of the amplicon, and three binary dilutions). After<br />

electrophoresis, the gels were stained with ethidium bromide,<br />

Figure 3. Dependence of the heights of peak G* ox (red), peak G ox<br />

(black) and peak A ox (empty triangles) on the [dG*TP]/[dGTP]+[dG*TP]<br />

ratio in the PCR reaction used for amplification of the 347-bp DNA<br />

fragment. Other conditions as in Figure 2.<br />

SYBR Green I or Stains-All reagent (Figure 4B). Ethidiumstained<br />

bands of the G*-modified PCR products were considerably<br />

weaker than those of the unmodified amplicon (even when only<br />

50% of Gs were substituted by G*, see Figure 4B). Such<br />

observation was in agreement with literature data 26 showing that<br />

ethidium fluorescence is quenched when the dye is intercalated<br />

next to G*. Notably, we observed even stronger quenching effect<br />

of G* on the fluorescence of SYBR Green I (Figure 4B) and SYBR<br />

Gold (not shown) dyes. Thus, results of the fluorescent DNA<br />

staining might be misinterpreted, for the densely G*-modified<br />

DNA, in terms of (strongly) decreasing amount of the PCR<br />

products with increasing G/G* ratio. On the other hand, staining<br />

of the polyacrylamide gel with the Stains-All reagent (Figure 4B)<br />

did not reveal significant differences in the amounts of the<br />

unmodified and G*-substituted amplicons, in agreement with the<br />

electrochemical data.<br />

Despite the approximately same yields of the PCR products<br />

after 30 cycles, we were interested whether we are able to follow<br />

electrochemically differences in the kinetics of the PCR reactions<br />

through analysis of the amplicons after lower number of amplification<br />

cycles. Previous data 15 revealed less efficient DNA amplification<br />

by PCR in the presence of dG*TPs, compared to PCR with<br />

standard dNTPs only. We followed electrochemical signals of the<br />

unmodified and fully G*-substituted PCR products after 5, 10, 20,<br />

and 30 cycles (Figure 5A). For five cycles, peak G ox produced<br />

by the unmodified amplicon was considerably higher than peak<br />

G* ox of the G*-modified PCR product. Even after subtraction<br />

of signal intensity produced by the control PCR mix not<br />

subjected to the thermal cycling (containing initial concentrations<br />

of ODN primers and the primary template), the peak G ox<br />

was at least twice higher than peak G* ox produced by the G*modified<br />

amplicon after the same number of cycles. Large<br />

differences between the signal intensities were also observed<br />

after 10 amplification cycles, while after 20 and 30 cycles both<br />

peaks reached their limiting values. Hence, more cycles were<br />

required to reach the limiting amount of the G*-modified PCR<br />

(26) Latimer, L. J. P.; Lee, J. S. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 13849–13851.<br />

<strong>Analytical</strong> <strong>Chemistry</strong>, Vol. 82, No. 16, August 15, 2010<br />

6811

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!