14.01.2013 Views

Analytical Chemistry Chemical Cytometry Quantitates Superoxide

Analytical Chemistry Chemical Cytometry Quantitates Superoxide

Analytical Chemistry Chemical Cytometry Quantitates Superoxide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6807–6813<br />

Direct Voltammetric Analysis of DNA Modified with<br />

Enzymatically Incorporated 7-Deazapurines<br />

Hana Pivoňková, † Petra Horáková, †,‡ Miloslava Fojtová, †,§ and Miroslav Fojta* ,†<br />

Institute of Biophysics, v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Královopolská 135,<br />

CZ-612 65 Brno, Czech Republic, Department of <strong>Analytical</strong> <strong>Chemistry</strong>, Faculty of <strong>Chemical</strong> Technology, University of<br />

Pardubice, Studentská 573, CZ-532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic, and Department of Functional Genomics and<br />

Proteomics, Institute of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlárˇská 2,<br />

CZ-611 37 Brno, Czech Republic<br />

Nucleic acids studies use 7-deazaguanine (G*) and 7-deazaadenine<br />

(A*) as analogues of natural purine bases<br />

incapable of forming Hoogsteen base pairs, which prevents<br />

them from being involved in DNA triplexes and<br />

tetraplexes. Reduced propensity of the G*- and/or A*modified<br />

DNA to form alternative DNA structures is<br />

utilized, for example, in PCR amplification of guanine-rich<br />

sequences. Both G* and A* exhibit significantly lower<br />

potentials of their oxidation, compared to the respective<br />

natural nucleobases. At carbon electrodes, A* yields an<br />

oxidation peak which is by about 200-250 mV less<br />

positive than the peak due to adenine, but coincides with<br />

oxidation peak produced by natural guanine residues. On<br />

the other hand, oxidation signal of G* occurs at a potential<br />

by about 300 mV less positive than the peak due to<br />

guanine, being well separated from electrochemical signals<br />

of any natural DNA component. We show that<br />

enzymatic incorporation of G* and A* can easily be<br />

monitored by simple ex situ voltammetric analysis of the<br />

modified DNA at carbon electrodes. Particularly G* is<br />

shown as an attractive electroactive marker for DNA,<br />

efficiently incorporable by PCR. While densely G*-modified<br />

DNA fragments exhibit strong quenching of fluorescence<br />

of SYBR dyes, commonly used as fluorescent<br />

indicators in both gel staining and real time PCR applications,<br />

the electrochemical detection provides G*-specific<br />

signal suitable for the quantitation of the amplified DNA<br />

as well as for the determination of the DNA modification<br />

extent. Determination of DNA amplicons based on the<br />

measurement of peak G* ox is not affected by signals<br />

produced by residual oligonucleotide primers or primary<br />

templates containing natural purines.<br />

Electrochemical techniques are increasingly applied in the area<br />

of nucleic acids sensing (reviewed in refs 1-4). Nucleic acids<br />

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fojta@ibp.cz .<br />

† Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.<br />

‡ University of Pardubice.<br />

§ Masaryk University.<br />

(1) Fojta, M. In Electrochemistry of Nucleic Acids and Proteins. Towards<br />

Electrochemical Sensors for Genomics and Proteomics; Palecek, E., Scheller,<br />

F., Wang, J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2005, pp 386-431.<br />

(2) Fojta, M.; Jelen, F.; Havran, L.; Palecek, E. Curr Anal Chem 2008, 4, 250–<br />

262.<br />

possess intrinsic electroactivity due to the presence of electrochemically<br />

oxidizable or reducible nucleobases, 2,4 making it<br />

possible to analyze them electrochemically without any labeling.<br />

Indeed, various label-free electrochemical techniques were proposed<br />

for the detection of DNA damage 1 or DNA hybridization. 3<br />

In spite of these efforts, application of various redox indicators<br />

and labels proved useful particularly in sequence-specific DNA<br />

sensing requiring reliable discrimination between two complementary<br />

strands (e.g., target DNA and hybridization probe 5,6 ),<br />

specific determination of newly synthesized pieces or fragments<br />

of DNA (in primer extension or PCR-based assays 7-9 ) or even<br />

identification of a single nucleobase incorporated at a specific<br />

position (in SNP typing 9-11 ). Generally, introducing electroactive<br />

tags producing “new” specific electrochemical responses (not<br />

yielded by natural DNA components) increases specificity of the<br />

assays considerably. Electrochemically active moieties can be<br />

incorporated into nucleic acids during chemical oligonucleotide<br />

synthesis, postsynthetically by chemical modification of “natural”<br />

nucleic acids 5,6 or using modified nucleoside triphosphates<br />

(dNTPs) and DNA polymerases. 7-12 The latter approach represents<br />

a versatile way to facile construction of labeled or otherwise<br />

functionalized nucleic acids and to efficient sequence-specific DNA<br />

sensing. 12 A critical prerequisite for these applications is the ability<br />

of a DNA polymerase to use modified dNTPs as substrates for<br />

efficient incorporation without losing sequence-specificity. C7substituted<br />

7-deazapurines and C5-substituted pyrimidines are<br />

usually acceptable substrates for (at least some) DNA polymerases<br />

(3) Palecek, E.; Fojta, M. Talanta 2007, 74, 276–290.<br />

(4) Palecek, E.; Jelen, F. In Electrochemistry of Nucleic Acids and Proteins.<br />

Towards Electrochemical Sensors for Genomics and Proteomics.; Palecek, E.,<br />

Scheller, F., Wang, J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2005, pp 74-174.<br />

(5) Flechsig, G. U.; Reske, T. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 2125–2130.<br />

(6) Fojta, M.; Kostecka, P.; Trefulka, M.; Havran, L.; Palecek, E. Anal. Chem.<br />

2007, 79, 1022–1029.<br />

(7) Brazdilova, P.; Vrabel, M.; Pohl, R.; Pivonkova, H.; Havran, L.; Hocek, M.;<br />

Fojta, M. Chem.-Eur. J. 2007, 13, 9527–9533.<br />

(8) Patolsky, F.; Weizmann, Y.; Willner, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 770–<br />

772.<br />

(9) Vrabel, M.; Horakova, P.; Pivonkova, H.; Kalachova, L.; Cernocka, H.;<br />

Cahova, H.; Pohl, R.; Sebest, P.; Havran, L.; Hocek, M.; Fojta, M. Chem.-<br />

Eur. J. 2009, 15, 1144–1154.<br />

(10) Cahova, H.; Havran, L.; Brazdilova, P.; Pivonkova, H.; Pohl, R.; Fojta, M.;<br />

Hocek, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 2059–2062.<br />

(11) Horakova, P.; Simkova, E.; Vychodilova, Z.; Brazdova, M.; Fojta, M.<br />

Electroanalysis 2009, 21, 1723–1729.<br />

(12) Hocek, M.; Fojta, M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 2233–2241.<br />

10.1021/ac100757v © 2010 American <strong>Chemical</strong> Society 6807<br />

<strong>Analytical</strong> <strong>Chemistry</strong>, Vol. 82, No. 16, August 15, 2010<br />

Published on Web 07/23/2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!